Time magazine article: mass wildebeest drowning
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Time magazine article: mass wildebeest drowning
"Global Warming: Bad News for Gnus"
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...669552,00.html
(sorry if someone else has already posted this...)
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...669552,00.html
(sorry if someone else has already posted this...)
#3
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The wonderful thing about freedom of speech is that it allows one to appreciate conflicting views, digest and assimilate and then turf them out or store them in the old gray matter.
I found this article hardly worth keeping.
If there had to have been a drought it probably would have been blamed on global warming too. I am however inclined to believe that natural selection is the greater sorcerer in this instance and that the 1% of the wildebeest population elected a poor crossing because of their stupidty and in fact by perishing served to maintain the gene pool of the population for a little longer.
Similarly if this is global warming and it is decimating the wildebeest population then it has got to be an absolute boon for the pesky crocodiles that have survived since the dinosaurs, who seem to be the beneficiaries of this man made global phenomenon. I suspect that many other scavenger species are rubbing their collective "paws" at the floating buffet the weather gods just served them. kicked some croc ***s and of course shrugged off a few feline predators to maintain the strength of the gene pool for a little longer!
I found this article hardly worth keeping.
If there had to have been a drought it probably would have been blamed on global warming too. I am however inclined to believe that natural selection is the greater sorcerer in this instance and that the 1% of the wildebeest population elected a poor crossing because of their stupidty and in fact by perishing served to maintain the gene pool of the population for a little longer.
Similarly if this is global warming and it is decimating the wildebeest population then it has got to be an absolute boon for the pesky crocodiles that have survived since the dinosaurs, who seem to be the beneficiaries of this man made global phenomenon. I suspect that many other scavenger species are rubbing their collective "paws" at the floating buffet the weather gods just served them. kicked some croc ***s and of course shrugged off a few feline predators to maintain the strength of the gene pool for a little longer!
#4
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And my delete turned out to be a 'post my reply"... truncating my last thought, which effectively was that the remaining 990 000 wildebeest must be heralded "Einstiens" of the species for electing the right crossing. Or perhaps they are better the "Hercules" of the species as they must have had the physical form and athleticism to maintain in this torrent beast of a river.
A final thought: Man is already manipulating, through seasonal burns of the mara, the migration and probably has been doing so for years. I believe that it is no longer just habitual burning by the masai, but now is a practice encouraged by the lodges to entice the migration to stay a little longer.... Can it be?
A final thought: Man is already manipulating, through seasonal burns of the mara, the migration and probably has been doing so for years. I believe that it is no longer just habitual burning by the masai, but now is a practice encouraged by the lodges to entice the migration to stay a little longer.... Can it be?
#5
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More politically correct nonsense. Weather cycles have occured over the last half million years. routs, floods, disease, etc., happen. I just got back and saw two herds cross. Two wilderbeests were goners out of three herds. Even ugly crocs need to eat. I did see many dead wildebeests on the shore under the bridge being eaten by the vultures(boy, did it stink). Don't worry about 1% of the wildebeests, I also saw hundreds of newborns who will fill the ranks. Remember Darwin and survival of the fittest, not some wacky scientist and a politically correct Time magazine.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What a silly and uninformed article. Far more than 1% of wildebeest die each year during the migration.
Next thing people will want is to build a bridge at the main river crossings to help the dear things get across and back safely.
Next thing people will want is to build a bridge at the main river crossings to help the dear things get across and back safely.
#7
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guess they had to fill space. A politically correct headline attention getter! Only 1% during river crossings? Overall, it's more than that the entire migration route and year-round, to boot. Survival of the fittest for sure.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sonali74
Africa & the Middle East
7
Oct 7th, 2010 11:05 PM
Nyamera
Africa & the Middle East
189
Jan 16th, 2009 03:54 PM
Matt_from_England
Africa & the Middle East
13
Mar 31st, 2007 01:49 PM