LA/Anaheim without a car-insane or merely inconvenient?

The Los Angeles area has been accurately described as 100 suburbs without a city. Most other American cities, worthy of a major visit, have a central core to which tourists can take mass transit and around which they can easily walk to major attractions. LA isn't one of those -- you either pick ONE attraction to be close to (Disneyland, for example) and expend a lot of time and effort to get to others, or you rent a car.

I wouldn't go so far as to say "insane," as it's clear you are aware of the difficulties you'll be facing in seeing something other than two amusement parks. But you are going to face a great deal of inconvenience.

Oops! Usually I follow these warnings with some URLs that will help. I was too much in a hurry this time. So here they are:

A pdf with all Orange County Bus Lines:
http://www.octa.net/pdf/sysmapoct11.pdf
It looks like you can ride the #47 bus from near Disneyland down to the ocean, and the #430 to the Anaheim Metrolink Station.

Schedule for Orange County Metrolink to Union Station L.A.:
www.metrolinktrains.com/schedules/line/name/Orange%20County/service_id/1151.html
Note that there is NO service between 9:11am and 4pm!

pdf for Los Angeles rail lines:
www.metro.net/riding_metro/maps/images/metro_metrolink_map.pdf

If you are just mainly doing Disney and the beach -- you won't need a car at all. But if you are staying more than 4 days (2 or 3 for Disney, 1 for Knotts, 1 for the beach) then you'd want a car. If you are going to other parts of the LA basinfrom a base in Anaheim, like to Santa Monica, the Getty, Universal, etc., you'd really want a car.

I almost always rent cars, but my 2 of my last 3 trips to Anaheim I didn't use one. There is a decent bus system in Anaheim/Orange County

Is there a reason you can't rent a car?

This would be far easier if you did.

If your main goal is Disney, Disney World is much bigger and better than Disneyland. Disneyland is in the middle of all of the LA sprawl. If you don't rent a car, you're not going to see much more than Disneyland and big city sprawl. If you rent a car, you can do/see a whole lot more. Without a car, you're not going to have much of a "California" experience.

I really can't rent a car, since I can't drive, and don't have a driver's license. My son will be 17 when we take the trip, so even if he had a driver's license, which he doesn't yet and isn't likely to by then, he couldn't drive a rental car. We have kind of been waiting to go to California until my husband can go to, since he does drive, but it hasn't really worked out as a family trip, and he doesn't share our overwhelming obsession with things Disney.

I am a little concerned that it's a lot of effort for a kind of difficult trip, but we like the idea of going to California instead of Orlando, which would be a bit cheaper, and I'm sure I can manage reasonably.

Have you been to WDW in Orlando? If you love all things Disney, that will, IMO, be not only more convenient and cheaper, as you indicate, but also more satisfying since everything there is Disney. Whatever you decide, I hope you have a nice trip.

Not sure about Disney, but la is totally do-able without a car. I agree la is vast indeed, so sometimes it might require you to make more than a transit to get to your destination, but not impossible.

We have been to WDW, and may end up there again for this trip, but we had been really curious to see Disneyland, since it really the "house that Walt built" in a way that Disneyworld is not, and of course they don't have California Adventure in Orlando. Plus it's somewhere we haven't been before.

By the way, thank you PaulRabe for the links. Those were really helpful.

Disneyland *is* a different experience than WDW, altho the California Adventure was not so great, IMO, but I totally get wanting to see the "original" place.

The first time we went to Disneyland, as opposed to WDW, was in 1986 and it has changed since then, but at that time, we liked the Magic Kingdom there more than FL. Somehow it felt like it was built on a more human scale, whereas FL was more larger than life.....

However, over the years, there seems to have been an attempt to make CA more like FL in whatever ways that they can, given the space limitations. They have managed to buy up and tear down parts of Anaheim and have built an on-property hotel, The Grand Californian (beautiful!!) and a sort of Downtown Disney, so there is more overlap today, IMO, between the properties than there was way back when.

We're mulling it over a bit. I've been looking at day tours, and it's clear that I can get tour operators to take me a LOT of places (although I have more options from LA per se than from Anaheim), but that kind of thing gets expensive fast. And I have heard that there are fewer differences than there used to be.

Was just going to suggest bus tours.... If you stay in Anaheim right close to Disney, there are several that will take you from the hotel to various parts of the larger area. Those hotels often cater to exactly your situation - people who don't or can't drive around but want to sightsee. (Don't know if you can get a tour to take you to the Queen Mary, which is a ways south, but it's worth it. And it's IN the Pacific.)

My preference between WDW and Disneyland would always be WDW if Disney is your only objective; but if I'd never seen the Pacific and the southern part of the West Coast, I'd stay near Disleynand and take tours from there.