European healthcare
Aug 7th, 2007, 02:48 PM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
European healthcare
We returned from Italy in mid-june with an adventure to report. My husband had a kidney stone attack in Italy and was taken to the hospital, given many medicines, an echo(sp)and cat scan. The total came to 78 euro. We said next time we get ill, we will head to Italy.
Three weeks ago I had a heart attack and ended up with angioplasty and a stent. (Baby aspirin a day saved my life!!!!)Didn't have time to hop a plane to Italy, but this all does make us wonder where in europe would you want to be when a medical disaster hits.
Three weeks ago I had a heart attack and ended up with angioplasty and a stent. (Baby aspirin a day saved my life!!!!)Didn't have time to hop a plane to Italy, but this all does make us wonder where in europe would you want to be when a medical disaster hits.
Aug 7th, 2007, 02:51 PM
#2
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree-Agree!
I had a crazy accident in Rome on a Vespa which I should not have been on, but...Anyway, other than not understanding the language (I did know they were yelling at me not to move, I walked out about 2 hours later...cleaned up and NO BILL!!
I had a crazy accident in Rome on a Vespa which I should not have been on, but...Anyway, other than not understanding the language (I did know they were yelling at me not to move, I walked out about 2 hours later...cleaned up and NO BILL!!
Aug 7th, 2007, 03:04 PM
#7
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fortunately, I haven't had to try any other health system but my own(never got ill during a trip), here in Spain.
Emergency care is free for everybody, like in Italy. So I suppose it is also good for travellers
I'm pretty satisfied of the system. Sure it has some failures (nobody is perfect !
) but even in my hometown which is a middle sized one they have good and modern equipment. In big cities you can have some of the best european hospitals.
Emergency care is free for everybody, like in Italy. So I suppose it is also good for travellers
I'm pretty satisfied of the system. Sure it has some failures (nobody is perfect !
) but even in my hometown which is a middle sized one they have good and modern equipment. In big cities you can have some of the best european hospitals.
Aug 7th, 2007, 03:23 PM
#8
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got sick in Canada. Went to ER in a medium size town with a brand new Hospital. Saw a doctor. Spoke to her. No tests. Didn't even take my blood pressure. Bill: $350 for the ER visit and $150 for the Dr. So, it's not all cheap.
Aug 7th, 2007, 06:20 PM
#11
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
danon -True, but the first poster talked about their own experience with health care in Italy and she/he is not Italian. So, I was just comparing that with needing health care in Canada and not being Canadian.
Aug 8th, 2007, 01:06 AM
#15
These are the countries with the best health care according to the WHO:
1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
Also:
30 - Canada
32 - Australia
37 - United States
41 - New Zealand
1 France
2 Italy
3 San Marino
4 Andorra
5 Malta
6 Singapore
7 Spain
8 Oman
9 Austria
10 Japan
11 Norway
12 Portugal
13 Monaco
14 Greece
15 Iceland
16 Luxembourg
17 Netherlands
18 United Kingdom
19 Ireland
20 Switzerland
Also:
30 - Canada
32 - Australia
37 - United States
41 - New Zealand
Aug 8th, 2007, 01:25 AM
#16
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leaving aside the emotional issues in all this, it would certainly - to put it mildly - surprise most people to hear that an institution claiming authority rates the health system in Greece as "better" than Switzerland, Germany or anywhere in Scandinavia.
Leading in turn to the suspicion (again to put in mildly) that said institution might not be quite the authority - or quite as objective - as it purports to be.
So what criteria did the WHO use?
Leading in turn to the suspicion (again to put in mildly) that said institution might not be quite the authority - or quite as objective - as it purports to be.
So what criteria did the WHO use?
Aug 8th, 2007, 02:45 AM
#18
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Availability is a big factor. Here's why the US ranks so low
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...insurance.html
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0...insurance.html
Aug 8th, 2007, 02:54 AM
#19
Here are the evaluation criteria:
"WHO’s assessment system was based on five indicators: overall level of population health; health inequalities (or disparities) within the population; overall level of health system responsiveness (a combination of patient satisfaction and how well the system acts); distribution of responsiveness within the population (how well people of varying economic status find that they are served by the health system); and the distribution of the health system’s financial burden within the population (who pays the costs)."
Belgium ranks #21, Lawchick.
"WHO’s assessment system was based on five indicators: overall level of population health; health inequalities (or disparities) within the population; overall level of health system responsiveness (a combination of patient satisfaction and how well the system acts); distribution of responsiveness within the population (how well people of varying economic status find that they are served by the health system); and the distribution of the health system’s financial burden within the population (who pays the costs)."
Belgium ranks #21, Lawchick.
