Closest European city
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Qestion was: It's not like you are walking, so why does it have to be the closest?
Answer: Beacuse I only have 5 days off at New Years and do not want to spend a majority of the time getting there & getting back & and then only have a short period of time to enjoy the location. I have to leave the AM of the 1st day as I cannot leave the night before as I am working too late.
I am able to travel Dec 29-Jan 2nd and looking for somewhere to go.
Also looking for location that is safe for a female travelling alone.
Answer: Beacuse I only have 5 days off at New Years and do not want to spend a majority of the time getting there & getting back & and then only have a short period of time to enjoy the location. I have to leave the AM of the 1st day as I cannot leave the night before as I am working too late.
I am able to travel Dec 29-Jan 2nd and looking for somewhere to go.
Also looking for location that is safe for a female travelling alone.
#8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Using a string on a globe my selection of closest European cities to DC are: Reykjavik, Dublin, Glasgow, London and Lisbon in order of increasing distance.
St. Pierre and Miquelon are politically part of France but geographicaly part of North America...but good one anyway.
St. Pierre and Miquelon are politically part of France but geographicaly part of North America...but good one anyway.
#10
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love these questions - Shannon used to be where airlines stopped for refueling when crossing the Atlantic, being the first landfall on the European continent. Play around with this website: http://www.etn.nl/distanc4.htm. Shannon isn't included, unfortunately, but Dublin is closer to Washington, I believe, than any other European city in the index, bar Reykajvik.
#14
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have a look at the travel times and number of flights you will see that unless you're going to Central or Eastern europe the time difference to get to many cities is not that great. (For instance getting to Shannon or Dubline is essentially the same - and London is only about 20 minutes longer.)
And you really need to consider the number of flights and when they leave. If a city has only one flight per day that leaves at 10pm you're better with a city that is 30 minutes further but has a flight leaving at 6pm.
If you want a morning flight you will be quite limited - since by far the vast majority of flights leave in the evening. I would stat by looking for morning flights - and would assume that London and Paris would have one - and many other cities might not.
And you really need to consider the number of flights and when they leave. If a city has only one flight per day that leaves at 10pm you're better with a city that is 30 minutes further but has a flight leaving at 6pm.
If you want a morning flight you will be quite limited - since by far the vast majority of flights leave in the evening. I would stat by looking for morning flights - and would assume that London and Paris would have one - and many other cities might not.
#15
Miz: If you "<i>do not want to spend a majority of the time getting there & getting back</i>, then the "Closest European city" is not what you need. What you are actually looking for are the cities w/ the most/shortest non-stop flights, best airfares, etc.
Many of the nearest cities like in Portugal or NW France would take a LOT longer to get to since you would have to make connections enroute.
Some cities w/ masses of non-stop flights include London, Dublin, Amsterdam, Paris, Frankfurt, Manchester etc.
All of those would be safe for a female traveling solo. But probably London, Paris or A'dam would have the best combination of things to see, quick flights, and low airfares.
Many of the nearest cities like in Portugal or NW France would take a LOT longer to get to since you would have to make connections enroute.
Some cities w/ masses of non-stop flights include London, Dublin, Amsterdam, Paris, Frankfurt, Manchester etc.
All of those would be safe for a female traveling solo. But probably London, Paris or A'dam would have the best combination of things to see, quick flights, and low airfares.
#16
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like London would be your best choice. United has a flight from Dulles to Heathrow at 9:46 arriving at 22:00. Bear in mind there are very few daytime flights to Europe.
I don't know how late you have to work, but you could also get a 9:47 p.m. flight the night before also on United arriving at Heathrow at 10:00 the next morning.
I don't know how late you have to work, but you could also get a 9:47 p.m. flight the night before also on United arriving at Heathrow at 10:00 the next morning.
#17
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd just like to echo those who are telling you you're asking the wrong question. If you're going to fly to Europe, the bulk of the trip is transatlantic making the difference in travel time between Shannon, London, Paris or even Vienna pretty much negligable. What you want is a non-stop flight that leaves in the a.m. (And even stopping to change planes isn't that big a deal.) Try to find one of these and go to whatever place excites you. What's the point of going to, say, Shannon if the thought doesn't put a great big smile on your face?
#18
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If flying out of Washington DC, it looks it would make most sense if you choose a destination served by non-stop flights via UA. Cities to the best of my knowledge include London, Frankfurt, Munich, Zurich, Brussels, Paris, Vienna. So long as you stick to W.European cities, flight time won't make much difference.
#19
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi M,
>>...why does it have to be the closest?
Answer: Beacuse I only have 5 days off at New Years and do not want to spend a majority of the time getting there & getting back....<
Ummmmmm. In this age of jet travel, the difference is only about 1 - 2 hr.
You would lose more time getting to Dulles than whether you arrive in Dublin or Amsterdam.
>>...why does it have to be the closest?
Answer: Beacuse I only have 5 days off at New Years and do not want to spend a majority of the time getting there & getting back....<
Ummmmmm. In this age of jet travel, the difference is only about 1 - 2 hr.
You would lose more time getting to Dulles than whether you arrive in Dublin or Amsterdam.
#20
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only morning flights I know of are NYC area to London.
Could you fly/train to NYC Thurs night to catch an early morning flight to London? Virgin leaves JFK at 7:35am Fri, arrives LHR at 7:15pm. Or there's an 8:20am flight from Newark, arriving London around 8pm.
Travelocity and Site59.com both have packages for JFK - London. I don't know the hotels; the prices look good for your dates. The flights that come up are overnight flights, though.
Could you fly/train to NYC Thurs night to catch an early morning flight to London? Virgin leaves JFK at 7:35am Fri, arrives LHR at 7:15pm. Or there's an 8:20am flight from Newark, arriving London around 8pm.
Travelocity and Site59.com both have packages for JFK - London. I don't know the hotels; the prices look good for your dates. The flights that come up are overnight flights, though.