Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Budapest to Vienna - Boat or Train?

Search

Budapest to Vienna - Boat or Train?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19th, 2001, 12:10 PM
  #1  
BillJ
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Budapest to Vienna - Boat or Train?

Planning next trip to Europe for next year. After a couple days in Budapest, will proceed to Vienna for 3 nights. Basically looking to see the regular tourist sights, then on to more of Austria and Switzerland. So would basically have 2 full days in Vienna, plus whatever on arrival day. <BR>Here's the question: The train (www.raileurope.com) departs Budapest about 0920, arr Vienna about 1200, leaves a lot of the afternoon for Vienna (about $49 1st class). <BR>OR . . . Hydrofoil up the Danube. Sounds interesting. Two companies on the net: DDSG Blue Danube (www.ddsg-blue-danube.at) and Manhart Passnave (www.mahartpassnave.hu) Both have same cost (ATS 830 one way) with identical times. Dpt Bud 0800 Arr Vienna 1420. (Is this just one company?) <BR>The cost doesn't seem to be that much of a difference, so, do we need the extra 3 hours in Vienna, or would we really enjoy the Danube trip? That is the question. <BR>Any thoughts out there would be greatly received. Thanks.
 
Old Aug 19th, 2001, 01:10 PM
  #2  
Paula
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I took a hydrofoil on Lake Como and had to get off. It was enclosed, hot, and stuffy. It moved so fast that you could not really see anything. The ferries were much more enjoyable.
 
Old Aug 19th, 2001, 02:19 PM
  #3  
Bob Brown
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We spent 3.5 days in Vienna last year and left a lot unseen. We did not strike a leisurely pace, either. <BR>But there is always this year when we return for another visit. <BR> <BR>
 
Old Aug 19th, 2001, 02:52 PM
  #4  
eva
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The hidrofoil is the same as Paula's on Lake Como,enclosed and too fast to see anything.The train is best option. <BR>Eva
 
Old Aug 19th, 2001, 03:44 PM
  #5  
Art
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It seems that the consensios is to take the train. No one that has tried it, cared for the Hydrofiol. Two days in Budapest will not even come close to seeing the city. I spent 7 days there 2 years ago and could have stayed longer. It that is all you have though, it is still far better than not seeing it at all. Have a great trip. <BR>Regards, <BR>Art <BR>
 
Old Sep 4th, 2001, 08:20 AM
  #6  
liz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I took the hydrofoil with visions of a lovely ride on the Danube with lunch,etc. It was awful. Old Communist era boats, enclosed, stuffy and too fast. Take the train,
 
Old Sep 4th, 2001, 11:45 AM
  #7  
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Once you get past Esztergom on the Danube, the trip gets pretty boring by boat. It is a wonderful drive with possible stops at Setendre, Esztergom, the Pannonhaima Monastary, The Mansion at Fertod, Sopron (these all in Hungary), The awsome Abbey at Melk, and the quaint villages of Krems and Durstein (in Austria). You follow the Danube frequently on this trip. The little towns along the way and the farm country in Southern Austria are just beautiful I know this is not what you asked about, but you should consider it since you are in such a pretty part of the world.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -