Seattle - Romantic Restaurant
#21
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you mind if I ask how old you are? The Georgian is lovely but it definitely skews older--not that there's anything wrong with that (I'd put myself in that category ;-))! But if you are in your 20s it may not be the best fit.
#23
#26
You're most welcome. Just trying to get a bit more creative.
Canlis is a classic Seattle main-stay, has been forever, same as the Georgian Room. I'm sure they would both be superb. But I think there are more interesting choices if you're a day under 50
Oh I see Campagne, the Market, hasn't been mentioned yet.
I am a fan of Tom Douglas restaurants, but I don't think any of them are cozy or romantic or perfect for a special occasion. Maybe Dahlia Lounge (but definitely not Palace Kitchen, Lola, or Etta's, all too noisy).
Canlis is a classic Seattle main-stay, has been forever, same as the Georgian Room. I'm sure they would both be superb. But I think there are more interesting choices if you're a day under 50
Oh I see Campagne, the Market, hasn't been mentioned yet.
I am a fan of Tom Douglas restaurants, but I don't think any of them are cozy or romantic or perfect for a special occasion. Maybe Dahlia Lounge (but definitely not Palace Kitchen, Lola, or Etta's, all too noisy).
#28
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi there - I thought that I would throw in a couple more - just to further complicate things I live in the Seattle area and my husband and I are going to get to the city for a romantic pre-baby getaway next weekend. There are two restaurants that were suggested to me that I did not see on the above thread - one is Place Pigalle in the Market (right behind the pig) - very romantic and a bit old school. Secondly , Mistral - which is a newer Seattle spot in the Belltown area that comes highly recommended for leisurely romantic meals. Have a wonderful time!
#29
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would call the Georgian to see if they have a piano if live music is important to you. I know the Garden Court at the same hotel has (or at least used to have) live music but I don't remember a piano in the Georgian.
Chez Shea does not have live music--they usually have jazz on the stereo--but it does have the view.
And I just realized no one mentioned Il Bistro--again, I don't think they have live piano music, but it's dark and candlelit and very romantic.
Chez Shea does not have live music--they usually have jazz on the stereo--but it does have the view.
And I just realized no one mentioned Il Bistro--again, I don't think they have live piano music, but it's dark and candlelit and very romantic.
#33
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NWWanderer,
I was surprised too. I had done a lot of research before picking this place--we were being taken out by a group from out of town and I wanted it to be very nice. And I have to say, I'm a bit embarrassed by this pick because I felt it was so pretensious and overpriced. Of course I'd be even more upset if we had to pick up that tab!
DD claims it takes 6 months to get over "food shock" after being in Europe, so maybe that's the problem--we were in France and Spain all of April, but really, this meal just didn't hold up to the reputation.
For example, I ordered the tuna tartare as an appetizer--and it was the size of a silver dollar--I'm not kidding you. My main course of lamb was good, but not great, and consisted of 3 very small pieces (sauce was very good).
DD ordered the complete menu and even he was hungry after several courses--the portions were so small that it was a joke. Really, we just ate at some great places in Paris, and we don't even like huge portions, but this was ridiculous.
The place itself was nice, but not as nice as many others (Georgian Room, Canlis, Oceanside, etc.). And the service was really just so-so--didn't refill our water glasses etc.
I rated it in the restaurant section here in Fodors, but see it hasn't shown up yet--out of 5, gave the food a 4, atmosphere a 4, service a 3, and value a 2 (3.3 total I believe).
If others have had better experiences, great, but we were very disappointed.
(However, the wine was great )
I was surprised too. I had done a lot of research before picking this place--we were being taken out by a group from out of town and I wanted it to be very nice. And I have to say, I'm a bit embarrassed by this pick because I felt it was so pretensious and overpriced. Of course I'd be even more upset if we had to pick up that tab!
DD claims it takes 6 months to get over "food shock" after being in Europe, so maybe that's the problem--we were in France and Spain all of April, but really, this meal just didn't hold up to the reputation.
For example, I ordered the tuna tartare as an appetizer--and it was the size of a silver dollar--I'm not kidding you. My main course of lamb was good, but not great, and consisted of 3 very small pieces (sauce was very good).
DD ordered the complete menu and even he was hungry after several courses--the portions were so small that it was a joke. Really, we just ate at some great places in Paris, and we don't even like huge portions, but this was ridiculous.
The place itself was nice, but not as nice as many others (Georgian Room, Canlis, Oceanside, etc.). And the service was really just so-so--didn't refill our water glasses etc.
I rated it in the restaurant section here in Fodors, but see it hasn't shown up yet--out of 5, gave the food a 4, atmosphere a 4, service a 3, and value a 2 (3.3 total I believe).
If others have had better experiences, great, but we were very disappointed.
(However, the wine was great )
#35
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sort of fascinating hearing the criticism, especially since I think
Rovers is the second best restaurant in the city (Mistral is the best, for what it's worth) but it seems like you are criticizing the tasting menu for not having more than a bite or two of each entree. That's what tasting menus are supposed to be - whether in Europe (where I travel often) or in Seattle. Rovers is not what I would consider a romantic restaurant, incidentally.
Rovers is the second best restaurant in the city (Mistral is the best, for what it's worth) but it seems like you are criticizing the tasting menu for not having more than a bite or two of each entree. That's what tasting menus are supposed to be - whether in Europe (where I travel often) or in Seattle. Rovers is not what I would consider a romantic restaurant, incidentally.
#36
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just DH and my opinion and we travel to Europe yearly, so maybe we expect too much. And I do agree, I don't think Rovers is particularly romantic. For me, when people ask for restuarants in Seattle, I think they're best off with Asian or seafood--I haven't found a French or Italian place I'd recommend yet.
#40
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We've always liked Al Boccalino and were last there only about a week ago. Something has changed, though. Food is still good, but there is a sort of heavy-handed maitre d'. that said, if you're willing to go along with it, you'll have fun. Don't think of it as a romantic restaurant now, though.