Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Scottsdale Princess vs. The Boulders

Search

Scottsdale Princess vs. The Boulders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3rd, 2000 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
Tara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Scottsdale Princess vs. The Boulders

I am thinking of visiting Arizona in November. I am torn between the Princess and The Boulders. My companion is an acomplihed golfer; I am a beginner. Which resort would you recommend? Also, how is the weather in mid-November in this part of Arizona?
 
Old Feb 3rd, 2000 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
Elsa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Tara,

I have stayed at the Boulders, and snooped around the Princess. They are TOTALLY different resorts. I don't golf, but I know both golf courses have very good reputations.

The Boulders is a "get away from it all" type of place. It is smaller, more contained, and beautifully landscaped to fit in with the natural setting that surrounds it. The Princess on the other hand is a very big hotel resort type of place. It has a number of shops, big pool, and lots of walking to the lobby (unless you get a room that is close to it). The Boulders has often been rated as one of the top 10 resorts, but you have to like a place that is quiet. If you don't care for that setting, then being ranked no.1 wouldn't to you. Also, The Princess is not as far north as the Boulders which means it's closer to Scottsdale (city part) and to Phoenix.

Elsa
 
Old Feb 3rd, 2000 | 12:44 PM
  #3  
Karen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You cannot go wrong with either resorts..they are both divine and the weather is too. Couldn't pick a better time to be here, it will be heavenly!!!
 
Old Feb 4th, 2000 | 09:36 PM
  #4  
Bert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The Boulders and Princess are very different, as Elsa noted. The Boulders is more expensive, but accommodations, scenery and seclusion are clearly superior as well. Its downside is that it's a long way back into Scottsdale/PHX.
Last stayed at the Princess 1 yr ago. It's certainly a decent hotel. I don't think it's worth the $$ they charge, as it's just a little too generic for me. Too spread out. Nice and quiet, though, if that's important to you.
The best hotel deal in PHX is the Ritz, IMO, but it's not a resort. For me the Phoenician is the best overall IF you get a good room (there are some very poor ones, location wise). Golf there is great, but at B and P as well.
 
Old Feb 6th, 2000 | 07:42 PM
  #5  
celso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have lived here in Phoenix, and YES both resorts are very nice, BUT...

As some have noted they are EXTREMELY far away from most of the "action" around town. If you don't care and want to be in the middle of nowhere, go to the boulders. Its even further away than the princess, and will take you about 1 - 1 1/2 hrs to get there from the airport.
 
Old Feb 12th, 2000 | 05:48 AM
  #6  
celso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Might I suggest the Phoenician Resort instead??

Its nicer than the Princess IMHO, and you have soo much better access to things to do like shopping and eating in Scottsdale and the Biltmore area.

The brunch is also amazing!! Just to give you a clue its $49 a person!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -