Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Philadelphia Rittenhous, Four Seasons or Ritz Carlton?

Search

Philadelphia Rittenhous, Four Seasons or Ritz Carlton?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18th, 2002 | 09:35 AM
  #1  
Melissa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Philadelphia Rittenhous, Four Seasons or Ritz Carlton?

Which hotel is the best in Philadelphia. we are planning a very SPECIAL weekend and want the best. Pros? Cons? etc...
 
Old Oct 18th, 2002 | 09:51 AM
  #2  
Susan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We spent a wonderful "special" weekend at The Four Seasons. Some of the best service I've ever seen. Tell them it is a special visit. The location is convienient to the museums but away from the nightlife. I've heard good things about the Rittenhouse which is closer to the nightlife. Depends on what you want.
 
Old Oct 18th, 2002 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
Frank
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Both the Rittenhouse and Ritz are centrally located in downtown Phila., close to restaurants and nightlife, as Susan said, the Four Seasons is not as well located. The Ritz is housed in a former bank building which was built in that grand style of the early 20th century. The lobby will take your breath away, so for that reason alone I would choose the Ritz. The other plus is that it only opened about 2 years ago and everything is new and fresh. The other 2 are in 1970's/1980's non-descript buildings. Needless to say, all three will give you a great experience, that's why they are probably the top 3 hotels in the city. You have a win,win,win situation.
 
Old Oct 18th, 2002 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
BTilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The Rittenhouse was finished in the late 1980s. If you can get a Square view room, you'll have one of the best and most romantic views in the city. Service at the Rittenhouse is excellent, and unlike the others, it's not a chain hotel. I would stay at the Rittenhouse and have afternoon tea at the Four Seasons.
 
Old Oct 18th, 2002 | 11:32 AM
  #5  
Nancy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have stayed at both the Ritz and Four Seasons. There are no cons at either of these hotels. They are both excellent. The Pros are: the Fountain Room is the #1 restaurant in Philly. The location is not a good as the Ritz, but it's not that bad either. The rooms/suites are bigger at the Four Seasons, newer at the Ritz. The service is excellent at both, a little more attentive at the Four Seasons, the conceirge floor at the Ritz is wonderful (not sure if they have one at the Four Seasons). It's a win/win situation. If I had to pick one I would probably chose the Ritz because it's new and the building has a lot of charm and history. I've never stayed at the Rittenhouse, but have been in the hotel. The lobby is beautiful and has the best location of all 3. Good luck!
 
Old Oct 24th, 2002 | 08:26 AM
  #6  
Gilbert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The Four Seasons is the best overall choice for special weekend stays. Having stayed at all 3 hotels on business, I can say that the Four Seasons has a superb and elegant restaurant, The Fountain (esp. Sunday brunch), and outstanding service that is a firm notch above the others. Rooms are more spacious than the others.

The Ritz Carlton has a wonderful lobby that is a nice spot for afternoon tea, but the rooms are somewhat cramped. Great location on the Avenue of the Arts but a little overpriced for the service quality, in my opinion.

The Rittenhouse has a pretty location right on the square, but the rooms are somewhat dark and dingy. It's an excellent choice, but not quite up to the standards of service. If you prefer to stay right on the square, this is a good choice.
 
Old Oct 24th, 2002 | 09:13 AM
  #7  
christina
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've only stayed at the Ritz in Philly. I have to agree with the great location. It's right next to the govt. buildings and close to historic philly. I agree that the rooms seemed on the small side however, the service was excellent and the featherbeds...we could have just spent the entire time soaking in the tub and snoozing under the down comforters! yes, the lobby will take your breath away!
 
Old Oct 24th, 2002 | 10:04 AM
  #8  
snohflake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To BTilke:

Just to clarify, the new Ritz on Broad was finished in 2000 but the original building dates back to 1908 I think. It had been a grand old bank building and then the Ritz folks had the place gutted and then built the hotel within the old shell.

The first Ritz in Philly was on 17th Street attached to Liberty Place shops and offices. It closed in 1999 (?) and then became a St. Regis before becoming a Westin.

I haven't stayed at the new Ritz, but have stayed at the Philly Four Seasons in a suite. It was wonderful in every way and you can't beat the Fountain Room or the Swann Lounge for dining, drinks, brunch, etc. While it's not in the absolute heart of things, it's really only a 5 -6 block walk difference.
 
Old Oct 24th, 2002 | 10:08 AM
  #9  
snohflake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also to BTilke:

Don't get your comment about it not being a chain hotel. They both are, plus Ritz is owned by Marriott.
 
Old Oct 25th, 2002 | 09:30 AM
  #10  
ttt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
ttt
 
Old Oct 26th, 2002 | 05:10 PM
  #11  
snohflake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I wonder where the last few posts on this thread went? Anyway, I apologize to BTilke for not properly reading the title or his/her post. I completely did not see that Rittenhouse was being discussed. DUH snohflake, DUH!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ekscrunchy
Europe
13
Oct 4th, 2010 08:34 AM
ga9497
United States
5
Jun 14th, 2007 06:44 AM
Dr_Andrea
United States
6
Oct 24th, 2005 12:50 PM
ndelapaz
United States
5
Oct 23rd, 2003 09:33 PM
Sharkeynj
United States
4
Feb 21st, 2003 01:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -