NYC: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
#21


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 25,329
Likes: 0
I think she might be a little old for Serendipity. But who cares? I think 21 is the best idea so far and if not 21, even Sardi's, if not for the food than for the theatre-district atmosphere. Just for curiosity, where is your daughter getting these ideas on where to eat?
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thanks ekscrunchy for finally asking the logical question. If a friend of hers told her it's great then she'd probably like it. She had to hear about it somewhere and must have some reason to want to go there.
Personally, I'd say it was the nastiest place we ever ate. Two young mothers with their kids finally leaned over to us and said, "can we ask you a question? What on earth are two middle aged men doing here?" They had that right. I can't imagine it possibly entertaining anyone over the age of 12 (and even that is a stretch). The five and six year olds were loving it though, screaming their lungs out.
Personally, I'd say it was the nastiest place we ever ate. Two young mothers with their kids finally leaned over to us and said, "can we ask you a question? What on earth are two middle aged men doing here?" They had that right. I can't imagine it possibly entertaining anyone over the age of 12 (and even that is a stretch). The five and six year olds were loving it though, screaming their lungs out.
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Why did I stay? I'm not in the habit of sitting down in a restaurant, ordering, then getting up and walking out.
We were told by a local businessman that it was a great place to eat and it was fun as well. To this day I haven't figured out if he was playing a joke on us or what. By the way, when we entered, the "entertainment" hadn't started. Once it did, we picked at our food a bit, paid our bill quickly and left. What would you have done, socialworker?
By the way, the bar in the Village by the same name is still there or was a year or so again anyway. We had been
there before. The two are not related, I have now been told. The one in the Village is a fun place to go for a drink -- actually kind of a hoot, not a place geared for pre-adolescents. So it was an honest mistake on our part to think the midtown one was similar.
We were told by a local businessman that it was a great place to eat and it was fun as well. To this day I haven't figured out if he was playing a joke on us or what. By the way, when we entered, the "entertainment" hadn't started. Once it did, we picked at our food a bit, paid our bill quickly and left. What would you have done, socialworker?
By the way, the bar in the Village by the same name is still there or was a year or so again anyway. We had been
there before. The two are not related, I have now been told. The one in the Village is a fun place to go for a drink -- actually kind of a hoot, not a place geared for pre-adolescents. So it was an honest mistake on our part to think the midtown one was similar.
#27
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
HI--I guess I just thought that it was pretty obvious from the get-go what the place was like...so I would have guessed that you would not have stayed once you entered and grasped the "concept". I did find it amusing and had no illusions that I was going for the food. Mr. SW and a 20-something son found it to be a fun place too. As I said, not at all NYC-like but, for me, fun nonetheless. The similarity to Haunted Mansion was the theme and the mock seriousness of all the staff/actors.
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
The atmosphere of the decor was fine. So again, I had no reason to be surprised or disappointed when we entered, sat down, and ordered. But unlike the tongue in cheek actors who say things like "come to the DEAD center of the room" at Disney, these kids (not actors) did nothing but scream and simply acted crazy. There was no "clever script". Mainly they ran around the room screaming at little kids to scare them (there were a bunch of 6 year old birthday groups, I'd say. Having someone scream inches from my head over and over for half an hour was not entertaining to me. "Mock seriousness"? You and I saw totally different shows, I can assure you. Maybe it has changed. Maybe the regular actors didn't show up that day so they turned it over to a local junior high school. I don't know. As I said, I enjoyed the campy "haunted" atmosphere of the Village Jekyll and Hyde, and this decor was similar. It was the "show" or rather the total lack of one that I didn't like. Food wise, I wasn't expecting Le Bernardin, but I thought it would be decent -- maybe like a Heartland Brewery or a Virgil's, but it was far from either of those.
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Also I'm clearly not alone in my opinion. Zagat's gives it a 10 for food (the second lowest -- only Mars was lower -- that I could find leafing through the entire book). They also say to beware of subpar food and surly, careless service.
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I didn't. OK?
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I didn't. OK?
#33


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 25,329
Likes: 0
I just have to post this: Yesterday I was walking past Serendipity (there are many antiques stores in the area) and two women with strollers were sitting outside. One was yelling into her cellphone: "They should have told us they did not allow strollers...this is a place for kids..how can they not allow strollers? We are sitting outside there now and have no idea where to go..this is so horrible.." and on and on. So heads up: they don't allow strollers! Not that your 17-year-old would be in one, but maybe it wil help someone else.
#34
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
We wanted to take my kids to J&H over the summer. The food can't possibly be worse than Mars, can it?! (My younger son LOVED Mars, and really wants to go back. I'll take him, but have no idea what I'm going to eat).
Anyway - what is the difference b/w the J&H near Central park and the one in the Village? Is one better?
Anyway - what is the difference b/w the J&H near Central park and the one in the Village? Is one better?
#35

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
The food is probably along the same lines as Mars (it's been years since I've been to either). The J&H in the village is the original, and has been around much longer than the other. I haven't been to the midtown one, but I would imagine that is was designed to be a tourist attraction. The orginal, was designed (I think), just to be something different in the village.
When my kids were elementary school age, we took them to the village one a couple of times for lunch. They enjoyed it. We never went dinner time, but during lunch, there are many families with young kids.
When my kids were elementary school age, we took them to the village one a couple of times for lunch. They enjoyed it. We never went dinner time, but during lunch, there are many families with young kids.
#40
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
GoTravel - pretend you are 11&13 y.o. boys. Would you prefer one location over the other?
Have you had the pleasure of dining at Mars?
Thanks to fodors, I've compiled quite a great list of chocolate places - most around the Village. So if we end up at the Village one, I can eat very little food and just eat the chocolate!
Have you had the pleasure of dining at Mars?
Thanks to fodors, I've compiled quite a great list of chocolate places - most around the Village. So if we end up at the Village one, I can eat very little food and just eat the chocolate!

