Directory

Forum Directory

Destinations
Travel Topics
Forum Contains New Posts
Forum Contains No New Posts

House sitting

Subscribe
Jun 19th, 2016 | 04:30 AM
  #21  
HA! What Janet said, and I am a dog person.
Reply
Jun 19th, 2016 | 08:01 AM
  #22  
Personally, unless the pet owner(s) were family or very close friends I'd simply pass on this deal. Too much aggravation for the money no matter how much the people are willing to pay.

OP may not have that luxury, however, as it is not clear if she is already house/pet sitting for the people and just now trying to figure out how much she should charge or if she is still in "pre" negotiations. Either way, with all the requirements for tending to the pets it sounds like a potential for "no good deed goes unpunished scenario". I'd walk away from this one.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 10:06 AM
  #23  
It is the age, medications and no control of peeing and pooing that make more issues, plus separate walks. Pet sitting, especially older animals, is more than just feeding. Besides cleaning, it is being watchful of the animal's appearance and behavior.

During one of my recent trips, one of my cats became very ill. My pet sitter is (due to needs of elderly family) a non-practicing vet. After she made two trips to the vet (once during a bad storm) and medication for my cat, it became clear that emergency hospitalization was required. My sitter and the vets were in contact with me every few minutes for nearly two days. I was at sea, so could not fly home, and it would have made no difference in care. My cat survived and my pet sitter earned every cent. Had I not had a very competent sitter, my cat would likely have died. It was a rare and totally unexpected event, but I was lucky to have her, not just someone plopping down food.

BTW, the cost of the medical care for the cat during those two days, was more than the cost of my trip. LOL. But, my little cat is here with me, purring and chewing my hair.

Consider that when pricing pet care. That peace of mind allows me to take a trip and enjoy it without too much worry.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 10:12 AM
  #24  
I would never skimp on our pets' care, but I think some of the suggestions for pricing here will cause the OP to lose her pet sitting gig entirely.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 10:23 AM
  #25  
Pet sitting 'gig?' Like she is being offered a wonderful opportunity to shovel shat?
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 10:30 AM
  #26  
I believe losing the "gig" would be dodging a bullet unless she is starving or getting ready to lose her residence.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 10:42 AM
  #27  
or if they have a pool, landscaper, a stocked gourmet kitchen, and a wine cellar.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 10:53 AM
  #28  
Sorry, but you do not ask a "friend" to do THIS kind of pet care without offering compensation unless you are a cheapskate.

This is NOT "the usual" in any way, shape, or form and I don't care what your house looks like or where you ordinarily live. And that "ordinarily live" stuff is about as condescending as it gets and that is being charitable.

As if you are supposed to be grateful for cleaning up some dog's pee and sh*t. Get REAL.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:14 AM
  #29  
I live in the North Shore area of Chicago mentioned by the OP and I recently paid a pet/house sitting service (found on Angie's list) $100 per day to stay at our house and take care of our two medium sized elderly dogs. Typically that price includes feeding (2-3x per day), individual walks as needed, any necessary medications and general house-sitting (mail, plants, etc). So, I would say that an "arm's length" pricing without regard to any family/friend discounting would be around $100- $125+ per day for 3 dogs.

The only untypical "duty" described by the OP is the bathroom issue which as an owner of 2 elderly dogs I fully appreciate this can be a real challenge. The key advice here is to fully understand the pet owner's expectations and then levy a surcharge directly relative to those expectations (e.g., do they honestly want 24/7 vigilance versus do they have an area of the house sectioned off for their dogs thereby limiting the potential for a big mess, etc.)

For finally comparison, the going rate for boarding at a kennel around this area is between $70-$125+ per day for "triple occupancy". I've lived in various states and generally find that house/pet sitting costs more than a kennel.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:22 AM
  #30  
Good lord, things must be slow in the Lounge today!

It's called "a paying job". If she didn't want it, she wouldn't have taken it and wouldn't be asking how much to charge.

The rest--whether or not You would want the job, for example--is irrelevant.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:25 AM
  #31  
<I'm not sure what the going rates are in my area.>

That's easy to find out. Get online, or call vets, whatever you would do if YOU were looking to hire a pet sitter.

I do think you deserve premium rates because of the intensive medical/health situation for these dogs.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:28 AM
  #32  
By the way:

A few years ago I took a job running the front desk of a boarding kennel. There were half a dozen teenagers whose job was to clean the kennels while the dogs were out of them, including removing feces and urine.

According to you folks, these kids: should not have taken this foul job in the first place; should have charged $1,000 per week for their services; should have charged a million bucks for their services.

It's nice to be privileged, but you guys have lost your grip on reality!
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:44 AM
  #33  
Those teenagers were not in charge of feeding and walking the dogs and looking out for their well-being. They were not responsible for giving medications. And crates and cages are a lot easier to clean than floors and rugs. At least you know where to look.

I don't know where you live NewbE but I would think people would pay their dogsitters a rate commensurate with their responsibilities. Sassafrass brings up a good point about having a sitter who will recognize if medical care is needed.

We should all be able to agree that the cost should be similar to what the owners would pay if they put the three dogs into a local kennel.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:57 AM
  #34  
Cleaning at a kennel is a who different task from cleaning in a person's home. Kennels are designed with pet waste in mind. Most homes are not.

Since the OP appears not to have done this before, I wonder if she knows what she is getting into.
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 11:59 AM
  #35  
noragrace!! If you decide to do this job, make sure you have the name and location of their vet, and that the people have made arrangements in advance that you can bring in any of the dogs for any reason and the cost will be covered. You want to have a backup if one of them ends up really sick. Because accidentally peeing and pooping all over the place, isn't the sign of a healthy animal!!
Reply
Jun 20th, 2016 | 12:04 PM
  #36  
I think the OP will not return. Wonder why...
Reply
Jun 21st, 2016 | 05:05 AM
  #37  
When I click on noragrace's name it seems she has left Fodors all together so everyone can stop giving advice to a non existent person.
Reply
Jun 21st, 2016 | 06:58 AM
  #38  
It would be interesting to know how the job goes, and what she ended up charging. Maybe she will come back and provide that info.

NewbE, it would be easier sitting cats, right?
Reply
Jun 21st, 2016 | 08:23 AM
  #39  
*I* have a chip on my shoulder? Right.
Reply