Does Our Weight Matter to the Airliines?
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Does Our Weight Matter to the Airliines?
Just read that since US passengers have been getting heavier, it is costing the airlines more for fuel approx. 275 million $ more per year. Now, does that make you want to go on diet?
LOL Judy
LOL Judy
#3
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
I'd be interested to know when vs. when in this "report" of information.
For example, if airlines have recently added more seats, and can carry more passengers and luggage per flight "in order to remain competitive" then, perhaps the add'l weight is NOT from the avg. weight per passenger increasing over time.
Besides, for every one person gaining weight, I would offer than another has lost weight - since dieting / exercise has become popular in the last 17 years. Yes, this is pure conjecture, however, it's chance of holding water are equally true with the OP.
For example, if airlines have recently added more seats, and can carry more passengers and luggage per flight "in order to remain competitive" then, perhaps the add'l weight is NOT from the avg. weight per passenger increasing over time.
Besides, for every one person gaining weight, I would offer than another has lost weight - since dieting / exercise has become popular in the last 17 years. Yes, this is pure conjecture, however, it's chance of holding water are equally true with the OP.
#5
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
I just thought that whole article on Yahoo's homepage was a hoot! LOveItaly. you are right about them not feeding us, Plus they get an added benefit of not having to carry that "heavy" airline fare;-). Triplesec, bottom line is the airlines will give any excuse for their huge losses, even our expanding derrieres. BTW, I did not realize that Southwest made the "very" obese people buy 2 seats!
#7
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
This new release by the airline industry is yet another excuse to claim loses and it is pathetic. "Over-weight" passengers don't cost $275,000,000. How about weighing the top executives of the airlines and deduct one million dollars from their yearly pay for every pound they are over-weight? Fatty boy at XYZ Airline could lose $50 million for his company. Mulitply that by six airlines and the lost money is recovered.
Trending Topics
#9
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,322
Likes: 0
Oh, you all are fantastic!!!! I needed a good laugh.
And don't we all wonder why the "top guys" never seem to give up salaries and benefits.
Uhmmm, since I am under the "average weight" for my height, never thought about "how about a lower priced ticket". Too funny.
Of course the airline CEO's sit and read Foders threads. Oh right!
And don't we all wonder why the "top guys" never seem to give up salaries and benefits.
Uhmmm, since I am under the "average weight" for my height, never thought about "how about a lower priced ticket". Too funny.
Of course the airline CEO's sit and read Foders threads. Oh right!
#11
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
I think you should be handicapped like in horse racing. The airlines could attach bags of sand to underweight passengers. The overweight passengers luggage should be reduced.
If you buy a fatboy's ticket and you're average weight you should be able to take a skinny person free.
If you buy a fatboy's ticket and you're average weight you should be able to take a skinny person free.
#12
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Here's an article about it although there's not much detail:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3984973.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3984973.stm
#16
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Seriously, these are things that can make a plane lighter:
- personal video entertainment system
- food/beverage carts
- extra fuel
- don't paint the fuselage, like what AA has been doing for years
And then they can carry less cargo, which cuts revenue, or give passengers less baggage allowance.
- personal video entertainment system
- food/beverage carts
- extra fuel
- don't paint the fuselage, like what AA has been doing for years
And then they can carry less cargo, which cuts revenue, or give passengers less baggage allowance.
#17
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
I just had to weigh in on this subject again after hearing just who wasted tax payers' money coming up with this study for the airline industry. The same people who saw no need to get the nation's flu shot supply from more than just Two labs in the world. The CDC. The government run Centers For Disease Control!!!!!!!!! This administraion is totally asleep at the wheel.
#20
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
This is no laughing matter. The 2003 USAirways commuter plane crash in North Carolina was partially caused by the outdated weight calculations of US passenger's weight. [The main reason for that flight was a maintenance error.]
Because of that crash, FAA has increased the approx weight of a passenger by 10lb.
Because of that crash, FAA has increased the approx weight of a passenger by 10lb.


