Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Colorado First Timers need ski information

Search

Colorado First Timers need ski information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14th, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
thank you all for the advice.

We are now arriving a day earlier and chilling in denver and slowly making our way to vail. We are staying in vail and skiing BC the whole time since we heard it is a little less crowded.

Only about five days and counting. We are totally excited.
psrome is offline  
Old Jan 14th, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #22  
MaureenB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
PSRome, your ski plans sound much better now. IMHO you don't need to spend the night in Denver to 'chill', though. You can simply drive on up to Vail and take it easy there. Drink lots of water, avoid caffeine and liquor (at first at least!). You should be fine.

Have fun! The skiing is amazing now.
>-
 
Old Jan 14th, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #23  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16,907
Likes: 0
But why stay in Vail and drive to ski somehwere else? Really doesn't make sense at all. Vail is huge, and you will probably not have problems with crowds. (Anyplace will be crowded on a holiday weekend.)
sylvia3 is offline  
Old Jan 14th, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #24  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
What's up with JJ5's bias against women skiers? Race ya-and I will beat you-down any mountain!
Abby43 is offline  
Old Jan 14th, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #25  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,876
Likes: 0
Don't waste a day getting to the mountains for such a short time. You are 2 hours to vail from the airport. Go on up, get settled. you'll need to spend some time the next day getting skis, etc. Just go on.
Gretchen is offline  
Old Jan 14th, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #26  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,134
Likes: 0
Still wonder why you feel a need to trek over to Beaver Creek when you have Vail at your doorstep.

While it'll only take 15-20 min to get to Avon ( depending on road conditions) parking at B.C. is a problem. You'll need to park in Avon and then take shuttle ( there is a new lift taking skiers up the mt. but have no information on it).

The idea that B.C. will be considerably less crowded is mostly fantasy. As already mentioned Vail is a massive ski area and if you get off the front of the mt., you'll find crowds are not really a problem.

Regardless, I know you'll have a great ski experience.
historytraveler is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #27  
JJ5
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,253
Likes: 0
You have totally missed my point, Abby43. Females need different falling instruction from the get-go because their center of gravity is in a different spot.

Rethink the way you evaluate. It's biased.
JJ5 is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #28  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Whatever JJ5. Maybe if you stated in your original posting WHY women need more instruction it would have been more clear. I'm absolutely not biased when it comes to women and skiing. You don't know me, so don't ever accuse me of being biased when you don't know a thing about me.
Abby43 is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
the reason we are staying in vail is because that is where i can use my hotel points at. The reason we are going over to BC is because of the crowd reason. We are kinda playing it by ear but are most likely going to end up skiing bc. Insteasd of driving over there can't we take a shuttle from the hotel over to bc? We are not actually staying in denver the whole night on sat. we are hanging out and hitting some sights on the way to vail and staying there.
psrome is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #30  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,876
Likes: 0
I'm not sure why you think breckenridge will be less crowded than Vail. It is closer to Denver, smaller, and just as popular. You can get real spread out on Vail. And I have to say, by eastern standards, Colorado "crowded" doesn't compute!! ;o) You have to catch your breath somewhere.
I still hope these folks will take a lesson (although that may be another thread).
And the beginner terrain at Vail is so nice. Up high on the mountain.
Gretchen is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #31  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,876
Likes: 0
And I still go back to why spend time on the road, even if the shuttle does take you. Walking up the hill from the "let off" point, and all that.
I was the one who is all for you staying at Vail--and skiing there.
Gretchen is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #32  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,429
Likes: 0
Gretchen,

The OP is spending their time at Beaver Creek, not Breckenridge.
wtm003 is offline  
Old Jan 15th, 2008 | 06:34 PM
  #33  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,876
Likes: 0
Thanks. That helps. BUT, what. It is still the same thing. Vail has a lot more terrain. Why go. I didn't particularly care for it.
Gretchen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
karens
United States
14
Oct 11th, 2012 11:13 AM
jackgus
United States
12
Jan 28th, 2008 09:16 PM
Dyann
United States
9
Jan 19th, 2008 06:20 AM
Jayneann
United States
14
Jul 30th, 2007 08:52 AM
mothradave
United States
10
Dec 18th, 2006 05:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -