Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

CA state parks closure

Search

CA state parks closure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 05:45 AM
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 82,882
Received 46 Likes on 17 Posts
Like the Irish?
Or the Polish?
Or other waves of immigrants?
starrs is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 07:24 AM
  #42  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>"Studies that I've read indicate that illegals just "suck it up" when they need medical attention, and not go to an ER "

Not true at all, hospitals can't inquire about status and we spend billions on free medical.
StuDudley is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 08:35 AM
  #43  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, Stu!

Welcome to the Lounge!

LOL!
easytraveler is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 08:46 AM
  #44  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting conversation! Thanks!
madison08 is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 02:44 PM
  #45  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 20,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, they moved it! Now the visitors will never know and bang on the gates of Ross in vain.
Dayenu is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 03:42 PM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I am with corli on this topic. Remember the operative word is ILLEGAL. Take a ticket, get in line! There are millions of people who would do anything to come here... legally. I really and truly dislike queue jumpers. Don't you?
Judyrem is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 03:55 PM
  #47  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I beg to disagree.

The operative word here is DISCRIMINATION.
easytraveler is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 04:09 PM
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,079
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
As a legal immigrant, I dislike queue jumpers too. Corli's position, though, is the default position of everyone who wants all those 12 million illegals shipped home immediately. They are supposedly to blame for everything including the weather and possibly the sub prime housing market. What is pitiful is that people who have no personal knowledge of illegals in California will not listen to those who know more than they do. When people remain so determined, up against logic and fact, then we are wandering into the area of discrimination as easytraveler said. And, a lot of illegals have gone home. They come here to work so that they can support their families, and they do work hard, but many of the jobs they do have disappeared with the recession. Just recently, I read a news story about there being concern that farmers won't be able to find enough migrant workers to pick their fruit this year.
Barbara is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 04:09 PM
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is wanting to control our borders discrimination? A country has a right to know or control, who comes here.
Judyrem is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 04:13 PM
  #50  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I have nothing against legal immigration. It's just that it should be in small assimable numbers, not en masse."

I agree. And all illegals should be sent home.
degas is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 04:22 PM
  #51  
ET
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For years, California's governors, the legislature and its citizens have been playing games with the budget, spending evermore, and using gimmicks to pay for it. Now, the game is over. The state can't borrow any more money or play anymore sleight of hands games with the budget, and unless something changes won't be able to pay its bills in July.

Add in California's progressive income tax system, severely affected by the recession and the revenue stream can't keep up with what Californians want to spend. The current deficit is around $24 billion in one of the highest taxed states in the country.

Currently, education and health and welfare make up around 80% of the general fund budget. They are both going to get whacked. The state has already given lay off notices to employees, furloughed many, and plans like closing state parks and raising fees for all types of services are being thrown on the table. What did people expect to happen?

Yet despite all the doom and gloom, Californians remain overwhelmingly opposed to raising taxes further, unless of course, they are paid by someone other than themselves. The problem is - there isn't anyone else to pay them.
ET is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 04:26 PM
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ET, I think, despite the short-term pain, this will be good for CA in the long run. It will allow them to set priorities and assign a value to what is important.
degas is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 06:19 PM
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really have to laugh when some of you cry "SOCIALISM"... wow...you mean when workers get over a month paid vacation? When there is free medical care for everyone? When schools and higher education is also available to all citizens? When the roads are good and well paved? When libraries are open?? I sure don't mind paying taxes for that.
But for you who decry Socialism, its a comfort to me to know you won't be taking any social security money, since its also a "socialist" program......
kleroux is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 06:29 PM
  #54  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"But for you who decry Socialism, its a comfort to me to know you won't be taking any social security money, since its also a "socialist" program......"

And exactly what logic do you use to propose that a person not seek a return of some of the mandatory contributions he had been required to make to SS.
degas is offline  
Old Jun 2nd, 2009, 06:49 PM
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dayenu - thank you for bringing up this subject about the California State Parks closure.

I would like to add that for every one dollar spent out of the California General Fund on the parks, the parks earn about $2.35 on day use passes, etc., that goes back into the General Fund.

So, by closing these parks, the politicians will show a $70,000 drop in expenses, but will have a $164,500 drop in income.

We wonder why California's broke - it's because the politicians can't do simple math.
toedtoes is offline  
Old Jun 16th, 2009, 07:21 PM
  #56  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update:

Yesterday, the Budget Conference Committee voted for the elimination of General Fund Support for California State Parks.

On the positive side, the Committee also voted for a $15 surcharge on non-commercial vehicles in exchange for free day-use access to State Parks for California plated vehicles. This fee will keep the State Parks open and running while reducing the State Budget by $70 million.

For California residents, this "State Park Access Pass" fee will pay for itself within 1 to 3 visits of a State Park. Just locally for me, Folsom Lake Recreation Area is currently about $8 for day-use access. With just 2 visits, I have recouped my annual fee. After that, I'm saving money. As a side benefit, I will no longer have to have cash on hand to pay the access fee. I will also no longer have to deal with those stupid little tickets on my dash to prove I paid, my California license plate is my proof.

I think this is a great idea and long overdue and I have sent a message to my State Senator and Assembly Member.

You can get more information and send messages to your state representatives from the Save Our State Parks website:
http://www.savestateparks.org/
toedtoes is offline  
Old Jun 16th, 2009, 07:24 PM
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or here is a link directly to an email you can send: http://ga3.org/campaign/budget_spap09
MonicaRichards is offline  
Old Jun 16th, 2009, 08:24 PM
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,079
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
That's a great idea. Maybe more people will use the parks now, although I'm not sure if that's good or bad! It'll make parking at the beach virtually free.
Barbara is offline  
Old Jun 16th, 2009, 08:36 PM
  #59  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even if one does not generally go to our California State Parks I don't think that an additional $15.00 fee for our CA license registration is going to be a big burden on most people and IF it will keep our state parks open it will certainly be money well spent.

Now I know some will say very low income people will be hurt by having to pay the $15.00 additional for their car registration. But perhaps those same people could or would take advantage of visiting our beautiful state parks in that they won't have to pay the day-use access fee.
LoveItaly is offline  
Old Jun 16th, 2009, 08:40 PM
  #60  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Barbara - I thought about that also. This concept of the "Pass" was originally researched and proposed for 2008/2009. The Department of Parks and Recreation says it will be good for our State Parks even with the increase in usage.

Part of that is simply that with greater visibility INSIDE California, it will provide greater visibility OUTSIDE of the State. That will bring more money into the State economy as a whole.
toedtoes is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -