Any suggestions for first champagne?
#46
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
I think mm is irritated by all the crumbs in her seat at Letterman.
Veuve Clicquot was served at a brunch this weekend and while I found it yummy I don't think a newbie (wanted to say virgin) champagne drinker would enjoy it. I had several glasses but many present were opting for mimosas.
Which, by the way, reminds me that the mimosa trees are absolutely gorgeous right now. There is one in the hotel parking lot that is stunning. (There. Made it travel related - and it's true).
Veuve Clicquot was served at a brunch this weekend and while I found it yummy I don't think a newbie (wanted to say virgin) champagne drinker would enjoy it. I had several glasses but many present were opting for mimosas.
Which, by the way, reminds me that the mimosa trees are absolutely gorgeous right now. There is one in the hotel parking lot that is stunning. (There. Made it travel related - and it's true).
#47
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
I usually do not require much Scarlet!
You all know what I was getting at. Every once in a while someone writes "Troll!" as if they've uncovered some conspiracy. We've gone over this before. I get irritated because I hate the presumptive and dismissive attitude it projects.
Yo Starrsville, the seats are fine. It's the sticky floor that gets ya.
I recommend a Moet Chandon White Star.
mm
You all know what I was getting at. Every once in a while someone writes "Troll!" as if they've uncovered some conspiracy. We've gone over this before. I get irritated because I hate the presumptive and dismissive attitude it projects.
Yo Starrsville, the seats are fine. It's the sticky floor that gets ya.
I recommend a Moet Chandon White Star.
mm
#51
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,872
Likes: 0
mm: tut tut. I think you owe everyone an apology, potty mouth. Missy taylorlane WAS a troll - she posted 4 identical threads, and then was zapped by the editors. Maybe the "self-appointed and self-righteous Troll-Detecters" can detect trolls because the trolls are soooo obvious . . . . . .
#54
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
janis,
I read over a lot of your previous posts and you sure know a lot about everything! I also noticed that most of your posts are of the corrective nature, i.e. 'don't do this' or 'why would you say' blah, blah, blah.
How can you tell if someone got 'zapped by the editors'? You can't. How can you tell if someone is sincere? You can't. It is not possible. Someone could post a recommendation for a restaurant even though the place is a dump. How would you know? Only if you'd been there. Since you can't get into someone's mind (been there) you can't know their motives.
For a cocktail I agree with the recommendation of a Kir Royale. Very nice indeed.
mm
I read over a lot of your previous posts and you sure know a lot about everything! I also noticed that most of your posts are of the corrective nature, i.e. 'don't do this' or 'why would you say' blah, blah, blah.
How can you tell if someone got 'zapped by the editors'? You can't. How can you tell if someone is sincere? You can't. It is not possible. Someone could post a recommendation for a restaurant even though the place is a dump. How would you know? Only if you'd been there. Since you can't get into someone's mind (been there) you can't know their motives.
For a cocktail I agree with the recommendation of a Kir Royale. Very nice indeed.
mm
#59
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Leona and rjw,
a Kir Royal (no "e" at the end) is in fact something slightly different: It involves some Creme de Cassis, a French black currant liqueur, but no Chambord.
The recipe follows the same principle, though: 1 part of Creme de Cassis and 9 parts of Champagne.
Apart from that the Chambord recipe sounds quite interesting - might be considerably easier to drink (dangerous indeed ;-) ).
Apart from that, I agree that going with the dry stuff is the way to get started. Those sweet wines and champagnes always tend to cause some headache.
a Kir Royal (no "e" at the end) is in fact something slightly different: It involves some Creme de Cassis, a French black currant liqueur, but no Chambord.
The recipe follows the same principle, though: 1 part of Creme de Cassis and 9 parts of Champagne.
Apart from that the Chambord recipe sounds quite interesting - might be considerably easier to drink (dangerous indeed ;-) ).
Apart from that, I agree that going with the dry stuff is the way to get started. Those sweet wines and champagnes always tend to cause some headache.
#60
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,379
Likes: 0
hsv: Thanks for the clarification. However, I have met others who know of the Kir Royal made with Chambord-- maybe easier to find? One was a bartender, so it sounds like they're learning how to make the drink wrong. It's still pretty darn tasty.
I just remembered that I bought an unusually good Agrapart NV Blanc de Blanc (chardonnay grapes only) for $30 at that champagne tasting. I'm normally strictly a brut sipper, but this was-- and I don't use this word lightly-- delightful. I also picked up an Etienne Dumont Brut for $20 that I liked very much indeed....
To whomever mentioned Bollinger-- thanks, that one slipped my mind entirely. Love that stuff!!
I just remembered that I bought an unusually good Agrapart NV Blanc de Blanc (chardonnay grapes only) for $30 at that champagne tasting. I'm normally strictly a brut sipper, but this was-- and I don't use this word lightly-- delightful. I also picked up an Etienne Dumont Brut for $20 that I liked very much indeed....
To whomever mentioned Bollinger-- thanks, that one slipped my mind entirely. Love that stuff!!

