Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

2 weekPacific Coast trip Portland to LA

Search

2 weekPacific Coast trip Portland to LA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7th, 2017 | 10:06 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
2 weekPacific Coast trip Portland to LA

We were given a 2 week trip as a gift. Flying into Seattle..then have 2 weeks to make our way down to LA..looking for any kind of help..how long to stay in each area, where to stay etc.. Any ideas will be greatly appreciated!

leaving for Seattle on 3/30 departing LA on 4/13...
Teachergal52 is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017 | 11:37 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Where to stay depends on your budget, what does the gift include for lodging.

That's a tight squeeze for covering everything that lies between Seattle and Los Angeles. You could do 3 nights Seattle and 3 nights Los Angeles and then have just 6 days in between so you'll have to research and decide if you're interested in Portland, San Francisco, The coastal communities, Big Sur, Yosemite or what? (We have no idea what your interests are....hiking, shopping, museums, beach?) After more research, return and ask more specific questions about lodging.
DebbieDoesDulles is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017 | 12:21 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
I was asking for a general overview..sorry to have asked w/o doing more research.
Teachergal52 is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
Two weeks is not a lot of time to cover this much territory. Do a bit of research and let us know what kinds of stops interest you. Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and LA could easily consume all of your time - and more.
Kathie is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017 | 01:09 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,752
Likes: 17
I agree with Kathie. 2 weeks for 3 huge states is not enough time. Why not make a huge loop and fly back from Seattle?
My plan would be to drive the coast southbound and then I-5 with a detour to see Crater Lake NP on the way back north.
If you are a US resident, I'm guessing that your drop off fee in LA will be quite large.
tomfuller is offline  
Old Jan 7th, 2017 | 05:53 PM
  #6  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,038
Likes: 50
>>I was asking for a general overview..>. . .how long to stay in each area,
janisj is offline  
Old Jan 8th, 2017 | 07:13 AM
  #7  
40 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
2m Airline Miles
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,866
Likes: 79
I don't think it's too long given the time of year, but it will depend on how much time you want to spend in any of the major cities en route, including Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and LA.

It's a rainy time of year in the Pacific NW, so if it was me I'd limit the number of days I'd spend in this region and focus more on California.

This is the basic route I'd take - https://goo.gl/maps/bKCCHev3QX52 . It includes a half-day side trip to Multnomah Falls and the Columbia River Gorge, then out to the Oregon coast in time to see the southern 60 or 70 miles (best scenery) before the California state line. I'd visit the redwoods, using either Ferndale or Trinidad as an overnight base, then straight to the Bay Area. I'd look at 3 nights on the road between Seattle and San Francisco, four at most.

I'd then allocate three days or so for the Monterey Bay/Peninsula area, and a couple more for the coast between Point Lobos and Santa Barbara. This includes Point Lobos itself, the Big Sur coast, Hearst Castle, and marvelous Santa Barbara.

Then LA and off you go. It can be a busy but not back-breaking two weeks, with terrific diversity.

Now as an alternative plan, if your plane tickets are unchangeable, consider just spending a day or two visiting Seattle, then hop a cheap flight down to San Francisco (under $100 per person) and spend the bulk of the two weeks in California. You'll have plenty of time to see lots of great sights, and you'll probably save the cost of the plane tickets with a much lower price for a rental car, as one-way rates and fees are lower if you pick up and drop off all within the state.

In fact, you could fly from Seattle to LA for around the same price and make the trip a big loop, even including some desert time, something like this: https://goo.gl/maps/xi825jkSAg72

Just throwing out ideas.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Jan 8th, 2017 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,038
Likes: 50
>>if your plane tickets are unchangeable, consider just spending a day or two visiting Seattle, then hop a cheap flight down to San Francisco (under $100 per person) and spend the bulk of the two weeks in California
janisj is offline  
Old Jan 8th, 2017 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
I also agree with flying from Seattle to either SFO or LA area airport. Consider alternate airports as well such as OAK instead of SFO, and Burbank instead of LAX.
jamie99 is offline  
Old Jan 8th, 2017 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,752
Likes: 17
FYI: There is an Amtrak/Metrolink station across the street from the Burbank Airport (walking distance).
It is also much easier to get out of Burbank with a rental car than from LAX. If you fly to Sacramento (SMF) you have easy access to I-5.
tomfuller is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EricaHier
United States
13
May 20th, 2017 12:14 AM
etorrance
United States
31
Apr 17th, 2017 08:58 PM
archerlimited
Road Trips
12
Feb 27th, 2017 08:41 AM
Joann_Robinson
United States
9
Jul 21st, 2012 10:06 AM
Aiofe
United States
12
Nov 30th, 2010 06:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -