central Europe trip...3 flights options. Your choice ?
#1
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
central Europe trip...3 flights options. Your choice ?
Hi !
we (2 adults and 2 teens) are planing a 32-38 days trip in Central Europe this summer. From Montreal we have 3 flights option
1) Montreal- Venice And Venice Montreal 4327$. We would take the train from and to Venice. And one day or two in Venice is not so bad ! Train cost around 110 euro (so 220 euro)
2) Montreal-Vienna and Venice-Montreal 5212$ One train and arrival direct in Vienna
3) Montreal-Vienna and Vienna-Montreal 6152$....it's a costly option ! But still the least expensive to and from Central Europe direct.
Thanks !
And if anybody here got promo code for Air Canada I will be please to have it !
we (2 adults and 2 teens) are planing a 32-38 days trip in Central Europe this summer. From Montreal we have 3 flights option
1) Montreal- Venice And Venice Montreal 4327$. We would take the train from and to Venice. And one day or two in Venice is not so bad ! Train cost around 110 euro (so 220 euro)
2) Montreal-Vienna and Venice-Montreal 5212$ One train and arrival direct in Vienna
3) Montreal-Vienna and Vienna-Montreal 6152$....it's a costly option ! But still the least expensive to and from Central Europe direct.
Thanks !
And if anybody here got promo code for Air Canada I will be please to have it !
#2



Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 74,969
Likes: 50
All of those fares look quite reasonable. Any would work -- but option 2 IMO would be the most practical and cheapest in the long run. Open jaw like that is usually more convenient and saves money (as long as both the arrival and departure cities are places you want to visit).
Sorry - can't help with the promo code
Sorry - can't help with the promo code
#3

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Did you try Montreal-Venice and Vienna-Montreal? Many of the *A flights out of Venice are early, early morning, so many folks recommend flying into Venice and out somewhere else. Is the flight from Vienna direct or is there a change of planes at a hub city such as Munich or Zurich? If so, you might want to visit the hub city by train and return home from there.
#4
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Did you try Montreal-Venice and Vienna-Montreal? Many of the *A flights out of Venice are early, early morning, so many folks recommend flying into Venice and out somewhere else. Is the flight from Vienna direct or is there a change of planes at a hub city such as Munich or Zurich? If so, you might want to visit the hub city by train and return home from there.
#7
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
yes we have been to Venice twice. We don’t feel the need to go back, but we have nothing against it !
still have to make a precise itinerary, but Vienna (and Wachau valley), Slovakia, Southern Poland, Budapest and western Hungary.
Trending Topics
#9




Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,719
Likes: 0
>> Train cost around 110 euro (so 220 euro)
Don't you mean 440 euro for four? Oh, maybe you mean 110 each way for four? If you don't know your itinerary yet, then how do you know the train fare from/to Venice?
>> It’s in canadian$ (should have said that earlier maybe !).
Not really. It i all relative and a matter of proportional difference as long as the $ being quoted are all the same currency (all CAD or USD or AUD).. The value in knowing your currency is relevant to converting the train fares you gave in euros (again iDK how you know the fares). You need to convert those rail fares to $ to get total air+rail cost of your international trip. The rail you mentioned is an extension of your international (intercontinental really) trip, like connecting flights only much less convenient.
The absolute difference between 1 and 2 is 885. Option 2 has added value because you get to start your trip with a nonstop flight to a city (Vienna) that you actually want to visit. Is that extra value worth the extra cost to you. At $221 for one person, it would be worth it to me. It cuts out the cost in time and money of getting to Venice for the flight home.
>> And one day or two in Venice is not so bad
Ok, but it comes at the cost of spending that day or two at a place you actually want to visit.
Option 3 is 940 more than option 2. That is a chunk. Getting from someplace on your tentative itinerary to Venice is going to cost you a day on the train or a positioning flight. But if your itinerary ends in Budapest or Bratislava then you could travel from there to a Vienna airport hotel for the night. Depending on flight departure time you could go from one of those places to VIE on departure day.
Anyway, I suspect that there are, or will be, better options than Venice. Need to figure out the cost in additional travel time. Krakow to Venice is over 13 hours, so maybe better to fly. Venice to Montreal leaves at noon, ok, but if it is a 6-hour connection somewhere then maybe Venice is not a good departure city.
Don't you mean 440 euro for four? Oh, maybe you mean 110 each way for four? If you don't know your itinerary yet, then how do you know the train fare from/to Venice?
>> It’s in canadian$ (should have said that earlier maybe !).
Not really. It i all relative and a matter of proportional difference as long as the $ being quoted are all the same currency (all CAD or USD or AUD).. The value in knowing your currency is relevant to converting the train fares you gave in euros (again iDK how you know the fares). You need to convert those rail fares to $ to get total air+rail cost of your international trip. The rail you mentioned is an extension of your international (intercontinental really) trip, like connecting flights only much less convenient.
The absolute difference between 1 and 2 is 885. Option 2 has added value because you get to start your trip with a nonstop flight to a city (Vienna) that you actually want to visit. Is that extra value worth the extra cost to you. At $221 for one person, it would be worth it to me. It cuts out the cost in time and money of getting to Venice for the flight home.
>> And one day or two in Venice is not so bad
Ok, but it comes at the cost of spending that day or two at a place you actually want to visit.
Option 3 is 940 more than option 2. That is a chunk. Getting from someplace on your tentative itinerary to Venice is going to cost you a day on the train or a positioning flight. But if your itinerary ends in Budapest or Bratislava then you could travel from there to a Vienna airport hotel for the night. Depending on flight departure time you could go from one of those places to VIE on departure day.
Anyway, I suspect that there are, or will be, better options than Venice. Need to figure out the cost in additional travel time. Krakow to Venice is over 13 hours, so maybe better to fly. Venice to Montreal leaves at noon, ok, but if it is a 6-hour connection somewhere then maybe Venice is not a good departure city.
Last edited by mrwunrfl; Nov 29th, 2024 at 11:03 AM.
#10




Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,719
Likes: 0
>> Train cost around 110 euro (so 220 euro)
should be:
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Venice does look like the lowest priced option compared to Vienna, Budapest, and Krakow. The departure date and length of trip could make a big difference.
Assuming you were not limiting your search to Air Canada, the actual cost comparisons might not be valid because of differences between fare conditions. particularly about luggage allowance.
Search flights || ITA Matrix by Google
should be:
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Venice does look like the lowest priced option compared to Vienna, Budapest, and Krakow. The departure date and length of trip could make a big difference.
Assuming you were not limiting your search to Air Canada, the actual cost comparisons might not be valid because of differences between fare conditions. particularly about luggage allowance.
Search flights || ITA Matrix by Google
#11
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
>> Train cost around 110 euro (so 220 euro)
should be:
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Venice does look like the lowest priced option compared to Vienna, Budapest, and Krakow. The departure date and length of trip could make a big difference.
Assuming you were not limiting your search to Air Canada, the actual cost comparisons might not be valid because of differences between fare conditions. particularly about luggage allowance.
Search flights || ITA Matrix by Google
should be:
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Venice does look like the lowest priced option compared to Vienna, Budapest, and Krakow. The departure date and length of trip could make a big difference.
Assuming you were not limiting your search to Air Canada, the actual cost comparisons might not be valid because of differences between fare conditions. particularly about luggage allowance.
Search flights || ITA Matrix by Google
we are not limiting ourselves to Air Canada, and we always take the most basic fare since we always travel with carry on only.
and we know the price of the train because it’s the price we see when we look for Vienna-Venice (which we would do)
#12
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Consider Munich and Prague instead of Venice - unlike Venice, they both are near where you wish to go.
Munich and Vienna are your nonstop options. Venice and Prague are your cheaper options, both cost about the same, both require a connection.
Suggestion: Fly nonstop one-way into Munich, follow the Danube through the Wachau region to Vienna (via detours to Salzburg and Neuschwanstein?), do the rest of your itinerary, and fly home from Prague, again on one-way tickets. Or try to book this YUL-MUC/PRG-YUL as an open-jaw and see if you save.
Happy trails.
Munich and Vienna are your nonstop options. Venice and Prague are your cheaper options, both cost about the same, both require a connection.
Suggestion: Fly nonstop one-way into Munich, follow the Danube through the Wachau region to Vienna (via detours to Salzburg and Neuschwanstein?), do the rest of your itinerary, and fly home from Prague, again on one-way tickets. Or try to book this YUL-MUC/PRG-YUL as an open-jaw and see if you save.
Happy trails.
#13
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Thanks for the idea. You can trust me that I’ve checked all the options and combinations in central Europe. Going to and from a mix of Munich, Prague, Vienna, Krakow and Budapest cost the same: between 1500 and 1600$ per person.
Since we already been to Munich, Salzburg and Prague I see no reason to pay more than Venice to go there since we will have to take the train to go where we want to go.
Since we already been to Munich, Salzburg and Prague I see no reason to pay more than Venice to go there since we will have to take the train to go where we want to go.
#14




Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,719
Likes: 0
The reasons to pay more than Venice are because 1) you have been there twice, 2) it is not really where you want to go, and 3) it is far from where you want to go (7h 40m or longer train Venice to Vienna)
>> 1) Montreal- Venice And Venice Montreal 4327$
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Does the cad 4327 include the train cost?
>> 1) Montreal- Venice And Venice Montreal 4327$
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Does the cad 4327 include the train cost?
Last edited by mrwunrfl; Dec 5th, 2024 at 09:19 AM.
#15
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
The reasons to pay more than Venice are because 1) you have been there twice, 2) it is not really where you want to go, and 3) it is far from where you want to go (7h 40m or longer train Venice to Vienna)
>> 1) Montreal- Venice And Venice Montreal 4327$
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Does the cad 4327 include the train cost?
>> 1) Montreal- Venice And Venice Montreal 4327$
Train cost around 163 cad (so 326 cad)
Does the cad 4327 include the train cost?
#16




Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,719
Likes: 0
4400 + 4x326 = 5,704
that's 1100 + 326 per person times 4
you don't need to spend 1304 in train fare plus 15 hours to get from.to Venice.
I would spend that 1304 and a bit more on Option 3. Better yet an open jaw using VIE, BUD, KRK with no backtracking or positioning train rides.
that's 1100 + 326 per person times 4
you don't need to spend 1304 in train fare plus 15 hours to get from.to Venice.
I would spend that 1304 and a bit more on Option 3. Better yet an open jaw using VIE, BUD, KRK with no backtracking or positioning train rides.
#17
Original Poster

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
4400 + 4x326 = 5,704
that's 1100 + 326 per person times 4
you don't need to spend 1304 in train fare plus 15 hours to get from.to Venice.
I would spend that 1304 and a bit more on Option 3. Better yet an open jaw using VIE, BUD, KRK with no backtracking or positioning train rides.
that's 1100 + 326 per person times 4
you don't need to spend 1304 in train fare plus 15 hours to get from.to Venice.
I would spend that 1304 and a bit more on Option 3. Better yet an open jaw using VIE, BUD, KRK with no backtracking or positioning train rides.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
111op
Europe
4
Sep 28th, 2006 12:54 PM
Windy
Europe
43
Mar 1st, 2003 09:39 PM



