Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Which European city is easiest to change flights?

Which European city is easiest to change flights?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 7th, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #21  
Original Poster
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
rkkwan, I appreciate all those options you listed. AnneO, as I mentioned, Delta is not an option, as Hilton Honors Points don't work with them. However, I took your suggestion, DAJ, and checked connections going to Rome and returning from Venice instead and you were right, the connections are better. The small airport nearest us, Binghamton, even had better connections. Going to Venice and returning from Rome, all the flights came back through Philadelphia, and I've read numerous times about what a nightmare it is to come through Philly from an international flight. Coming from Venice, they all go through Pittsburgh (which is a great airport, we've been through there several times). There would still be two stops on the way back, but that would probably be outweighed by the airport being less than an hour from our house, as long as one of the stops isn't Philadelphia. Thanks to everyone for all the tips!
SusanP is offline  
Old Aug 7th, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #22  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
SusanP - Coming back through PHL is not a big problem, as long as you know you can exit the international terminal and go outside to get to the domestic terminal. The bottleneck is the security point, which you can bypass.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Aug 7th, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #23  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 98,242
Likes: 12
I have never had a problem at Heathrow. You do have to change terminals, but it is no big deal. Just make sure your "London" is in fact arriving AND departing Heathrow (British Air for one now uses all three airports, so you need to pay attention to the airport code letters to avoid arriving Heathrow and leaving from one of the other London airports which, I'm told, is a hassle).

Coming from Seattle this is my best route to Geneva, so don't have experience with the others you mentioned.
suze is offline  
Old Aug 7th, 2004 | 08:36 AM
  #24  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
We like Frankfurt. Heathrow can either be good or a NIGHTMARE depending what terminal you are arriving and connected to. We have used both, Frankfurt is would be our first choice. Agree with the other posters...just don't go through CDG unless you have to. It is terrible.
allanc is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2004 | 05:42 AM
  #25  
Fairhope
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My connection time(memphis/amsterdam/rome) at T'giving in Amsterdam is 65 minutes. What are the chances I'll make the Rome flight
 
Old Aug 9th, 2004 | 12:09 PM
  #26  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Fairhope: if your flight from Memphis is more or less on-time your chance of making the connection is 99.99%. Amsterdam is an easy airport to transfer; you'll just need to walk to the departure gate and clear immigration. (you will automatically pass an immigration checkpoint on your way from your arrival gate to your departure gate)
Sjoerd is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #27  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 0
CDG in Paris is TERRIBLE, avoid at all costs! I love Heathrow and Frankfurt personally
TexasAggie is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 10:24 AM
  #28  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Frankfurt has always been a smooth change for us. Avoid Heathrow, it is a crapshoot depending on gates, terminals. Have also changed in Brussels. It is a small airport but the change was easy with no problems and that was right after 9/11. Hope this helps.
apseals is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 10:32 AM
  #29  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
I try connecting through Amsterdam for European and Asian destinations.

I hate connecting through Heathrow and CDG is a nightmare. Frankfurt is OK but AMS is always the first choice for me.
lifetravel is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #30  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Amsterdam is my personal fave. Not only is it easy to use, it's actually pleasant to be in.
Heathrow and CDG are examples of why people hate airports.
martytravels is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 01:27 PM
  #31  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Schiphol in Amsterdam has to be one of the best airports to navigate through. It also has a lot of nice shops to help idle away the time if you're waiting for a connection, and a Rijksmuseum, complete with a Rembrandt (and the busiest Burger King in the world, supposedly).

If you have enough time before your flight to Italy, you can take the train and be standing in downtown Amsterdam in 20 minutes! We did that on a 7 hour layover from JFK to Rome. Stopped in a coffeeshop and found that was the best way to get over jetlag. Peace.

Robyn
artstuff is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #32  
Original Poster
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Thanks to everyone for the additional input. I'll avoid Heathrow & CDG at all costs!
SusanP is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #33  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Just wanted to nominate artstuff for the best possible argument for choosing an airport.

Not the (really rather hokey) mini Rijksmuseum. But the opportunity to...er, not inhale.

The only thing in the world airport system that beats the swimming pool at Changi as a way of relaxing.

And a tip for the next time (and sadly, there definitely will be a next time) KLM messes me up
flanneruk is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #34  
DAJ
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
As I was scrolling through this post, I realized this is great information as I have not travelled that extensively to have experienced the vast array of airports mentioned. This is actually a great post and shows why Fodors.com is a wonderful forum.

Thanks for having asked this questions SusanP. Great Stuff!
DAJ is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #35  
mjs
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,882
Likes: 0
Have only changed planes in CDG FRA LHR and MUC. Do not care for the first three choices. Munich is not bad at all.
mjs is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2004 | 06:12 PM
  #36  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
By far, AMS is sooooo easy and actually pleasant

http://www.schiphol.nl/home/Index.jsp

Love the florist -- great to pick up a perfect Dutch bouquet en route.

Otherwise I'd plump for German or Swiss transfer points. LHR is a nightmare; and though I love France, CDG is to-be-avoided.
HTH!!
ealing_calling is offline  
Old Aug 19th, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #37  
ody
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Amsterdam!
ody is offline  
Old Aug 19th, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #38  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Amsterdam's Schipol Airport has always been know to be one of the most efficient airports in Europe.
Scotia is offline  
Old Aug 19th, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #39  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Another vote for Schiphol, even despite the fact that the last time through, the baggage system broke down and our bags were delayed to our onward destination.
laverendrye is offline  
Old Aug 19th, 2004 | 06:04 PM
  #40  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
My favorite Schiphol story. When we arrived there and our bags had all been lost by British Airways, I was concerned about our car service waiting to meet us while we had to go fill out the forms with the disorganized BA office. When I asked a guard if I could go out to the waiting area and return to the baggage area (inside customs) he asked me if I had the person's cell phone number. When I said yes, he handed me his phone and told me to call them. Can you imagine that happening anywhere else?
Patrick is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -