which airport better for short transfer time - CDG, FRA or MUN
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
which airport better for short transfer time - CDG, FRA or MUN
I've missed many flights changing Air France flights in Paris over the past couple years, so I'm thinking of flying Lufthansa this time from Boston to Rome. I can change in Frankfurt or Munich. Any opinions on the most efficient airport to move through arriving from the US?
#8
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FRA.
I would think that you have to pass security again between your flights (enter Schengen area, immigration in Germany) and MUC security has the most obnoxious personnel in all of the German airports I have encountered (quite a few). I have never been harrassed as much as in Munich - and not only on one occasion.
In general they seem to take some false pride in holding up the German image of being orderly to the extent where there is no more room for common sense.
I would think that you have to pass security again between your flights (enter Schengen area, immigration in Germany) and MUC security has the most obnoxious personnel in all of the German airports I have encountered (quite a few). I have never been harrassed as much as in Munich - and not only on one occasion.
In general they seem to take some false pride in holding up the German image of being orderly to the extent where there is no more room for common sense.
#9
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 49,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was going to say it's unanimous - Munich - but then I read hsv's post and remembered the last two times I went through Munich and was manhandled beyond belief by two enormous female German security officers both times. My traveling partner even commented she didn't know I liked to have rough sex in the morning! It was bad.
#10
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just for a balance, I used MUC airport few times for Europe - Asia connection and remember no particular trouble as above 2 posters state. And I too think MUC is the best of the 3 airports for connection.
#11
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason why MUC is one of the best airports in Europe for connection is that it was specifically built as a hub for Lufthansa and other Star Alliance airlines. Terminal 2 only opened in 2003, and incorporates a state-of-the-art bagggage handling system, short walks to gates and absence of any satellites, necessitating the use of buses or driverless trains.
Both FRA and CDG have developed organically with the growth of air travel. If you are building a new airport today, you won't start with Frankfurt, CDG, or Heathrow!
Both FRA and CDG have developed organically with the growth of air travel. If you are building a new airport today, you won't start with Frankfurt, CDG, or Heathrow!
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for all the replies, I think I'll try MUC. You can run into rude personnel anywhere, but it sounds like the infrastructure is set up better in Munich. I spent most of my allowed transfer time on a bus in Paris.
#14
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm.. if you're talking about security checkpoints, I've never had an unfriendly experience there in 40 or so flights per year.. at passport control, which I use only 6 or so times per year.. well, not unfriendly, but often so sloooow.. my tax euros (not) at work lol
if you run into a problem with either, there are complaints forms available in the waiting areas near the gates..
if you run into a problem with either, there are complaints forms available in the waiting areas near the gates..
#15
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is Vienna an option as a transfer site? Two years ago, we flew from Atlanta into and out of Vienna on our way to Florence and Rome. The Vienna airport is smaller and easier to navigate than the others mentioned, and security inspections were much more efficient and quicker than in FRA or CDG, which has to the be world's worst in that regard. I don't know yet about MUC; we will be flying there next spring, so I am following this thread with interest. Does MUC, like FRA, have two security checks for departing international flights? That was a real time-killer in Frankfurt. CDG had only one check, but the average wait time on two recent departures was over an hour and the lines were so long that it was hard to know what line to get in. At Vienna, there was one security check and the wait time was no more than 10 minutes.
#16
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 26,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Munich is better than Frankfurt, but out of Boston, I would fly Northwest via AMS over Lufthansa via MUC. I think the airport is just as easy and the plane will be better equipped - with AVOD vs looped movies and power ports in the front half of the cabin.
This assumes that you are traveling in the back. Up front, I would go with Lufthansa.
This assumes that you are traveling in the back. Up front, I would go with Lufthansa.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marthag
Europe
21
Jul 18th, 2005 09:14 PM