Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Warwick Castle or York

Search

Warwick Castle or York

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9th, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Warwick Castle or York

If you had a choice and not much time which would you pick for a day-trip from London?
donnae_b is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2003 | 11:52 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
The York Minster was one of the highlights of our trip to England. The town was also enjoyable. Warwick castle was neat, but not close, in my opinion, to the Minster.
Mary_Fran is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2003 | 04:49 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,872
Likes: 0
both are wonderful - but it totally depends on your interests.

Warwick is the most complete Medieval castle in England and is a lovely day trip. The town including St Mary's Church also should not be missed.

York is more of a "complete experience" since it is a walled city (only parts of Warwick's city walls are still standing), the Minster, Shambles, and great museums.

If you have kids w/ you I'd probably choose Warwick - it would be a shorter day, less tiring and kids LOVE it.

If you are on your own I might pick York - but it would be a very long day.
janis is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #4  
Ani
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
We did both last year on our first trip to the UK-and both out of a love for medieval history. Warwick is amazing...but short lived...too many children running around-too many wax figures taking away from the experience (IMHO). York was AMAZING. We talk about going back all the time even though we only had just over 1 full day. The Minster is incredible (we are by no means religious), the cobblestoned streets, the wonderful medeival pubs and restaurants...couldn't say enough about it. This is simple-hands down...York!
Ani is offline  
Old Aug 9th, 2003 | 06:58 PM
  #5  
ed
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
I agree Warwick is interesting but sort of artificial ( in spite of the real historical aspects) but York is real.:-B
ed is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2003 | 08:27 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
York is really far away and right now the trains are running really slow because of the heat - the tracks are having a problem. Think about going to Dover Castle - fasinating.
Lindaraem is offline  
Old Aug 10th, 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
York is further from London than Warwick or Dover, but according to www.nationalrail.co.uk, train travel times from London to Warwick, York, and Dover Priory (for Dover Castle) are about the same, between an hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours for a direct connection. If traveling by train, the choice between the three should depend on which destination appears most rewarding.

If you'll be driving, however, the trip to York would, in my opinion, be too long, at 3 hours, to be a comfortable day-trip. However, you're the best judge of your comfort level driving that much in a single day.

By the way, the London-York route appears not to be among those affected by heat-related delays, per the nationalrail website.
Mary_Fran is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nancy_W
Europe
10
Dec 12th, 2009 09:53 AM
shaytravels
Europe
24
Mar 5th, 2008 03:00 PM
HeleneW
Europe
15
Mar 19th, 2007 06:17 AM
jerryny
Europe
13
Dec 8th, 2005 12:59 PM
Laura
Europe
8
Mar 16th, 2003 09:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -