Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

TSA - Personal lubricants = yes, hand lotion = no

Search

TSA - Personal lubricants = yes, hand lotion = no

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23rd, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #1  
lyb
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
TSA - Personal lubricants = yes, hand lotion = no

Today, I thought I'd look at the latest list of what can and can't be brought in carry on luggage on the TSA website.

It still says "All creams and lotions including Neosporin or first-aid creams and ointments, topical or rash creams and ointments, suntan lotions, moisturizers, etc. - not allowed in carry-on"

However, it then lists at the bottom of the list... "Personal lubricants - Up to 4 oz." yes for carry on" :-\

Is it just me, but this seems very funny! I may be naive, but why would you need "personal lubicrant" during a flight..well, I can think of some reasons..

And my other question is, can I pass off my Bath & Body Works hand lotion as my "personal lubricannt?"
lyb is offline  
Old Aug 23rd, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
LOL !!

JandaO is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 03:24 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
I suppose they somehow want the mile high club to keep going on (rimshot)...but you know...seriously...I believe that might refer to saline solution (?). I'm pretty sure I read on the TSA sight about being able to bring 4 oz of saline solution which I desperately need to take on board with me so I can take my lenses out to sleep and then put back in nearing arrival.
trafaelwyr is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 06:01 AM
  #4  
ellabella
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
On one website, they clearly stated KY Jelly...
 
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 06:03 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
This thread has the potential to become way to gross, so here's what I think they mean . . .

They really do mean K-Y Jelly, but for use as a lubricant for people who have colostomy equipment and such that they must maintain.
ndf321 is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 07:41 AM
  #6  
lyb
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
>.colostomy equipment and such that they must maintain<<

Okay, at least there's a reason....

Saline solution is listed separately...so it's definitely KY or similar...
lyb is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
"Personal lubricants" could mean booze.
TorontoSteven is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 08:01 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
This is ridiculous. It should be all or nothing. What is to stop a terrorist from claiming that his "explosives" are just a personal lubricant?

Did anyone see the movie where Katherine Zeta Jones played a wealthy San Diego housewife/drug smuggler who got drugs across the U.S./Mexico border by turning the drugs into puppets. When placed in water, the puppets dissolved into heroin.

What is to stop a terrorist from doing this kind of thing in the future with explosives?

We are crazy to think we are safe.

Christine
handmaiden is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Christine, I would suggest that in fact flying is quite safe, but that we are crazy to think that these new regulations are making us any safer.

These regulations only inconvienience the "non-terrorist" traveller. As a terrorist, how hard would it be to sick your tube of liquids down your pants, or in a money belt? Metal detectors don't detect liquids, there is no way to know if someone has a liquid on their person going through security. Or Mr.Terrorist gets a prescription for cough syrup and dumps the contents and fills with explosives. It is really silly how easy it would be.

The latest rule I heard is "no gel filled bras". Who exactly is going to be checking for this??

Most of the banned substances aren't being checked for, only requested that you don't bring them, it is almost an honour system. Last I checked, terrorists don't abide by the honour system.
saltymuffin is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,419
Likes: 0
Do they check if "the girls" are natural or filled with gels? Or only the bras?
FainaAgain is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #11  
lyb
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
I have some male friends who would love to apply for the job of checking if women are wearing bras with gel ?
lyb is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #12  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Most of my bras are lightly padded and I've had screeners sort of squeezing me for the past year and a half. They also ask me to shake my hair back and forth (it's long and thick and they think I might be hiding something in it?)and I feel really ridiculous, like I'm in a bad porn movie. But it's better than having them run their latex gloved-hands through my hair.
fishee is offline  
Old Aug 24th, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Stock in that Victoria Secret push-up bra with gel will go wayyyyyyyyyy down with this newest TSA no no.....
andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PalenQ
Europe
9
Aug 2nd, 2007 08:09 PM
liver227
United States
14
Feb 16th, 2007 07:18 PM
Annie60
Air Travel
5
Oct 24th, 2006 12:25 PM
Demented
Europe
22
Apr 30th, 2006 12:54 PM
PLMN
Europe
26
Sep 15th, 2004 08:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -