Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

New buildings in London

Search

New buildings in London

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4th, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #21  
hsv
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
stokebailey, I think he deserves the benefit of doubt.
hsv is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 05:10 AM
  #22  
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Well, flanneruk, we'll have to part company on who should control an artist's work. I'm sorry Britain has been blowing up those buildings and continues to do so. I'm with Ruskin on that one, who once wrote we have no right to tear old buildings down.
primeranoche is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 06:29 AM
  #23  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
It appears from poking around the web that the Polish sculptor of the eagle on the U.S. embassy facade, Theodore Roszac, was a regular collaborator with Saarinen, and it was part of the original design.
DancingBearMD is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 06:46 AM
  #24  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,269
Likes: 0
>>I'm with Ruskin on that one, who once wrote we have no right to tear old buildings down.<<

Did he ever imagine the new buildings of his day would become old? Plenty of old buildings are no longer fit for purpose, and maybe never were; and the ones that are being pulled down now required older (and often better) ones to be pulled down in their day.
PatrickLondon is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 06:52 AM
  #25  
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Read Ruskin. He was pretty adamant about it:

http://books.google.com/books?id=a2G...age&q=&f=false
primeranoche is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #26  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
I guess Baron Haussmann is damned to hell then.

Architectural preservation in urban settings is a complex issue. The original Waldorf and Astoria hotels were torn down to build the Empire State Building--would New York City have been better off if that had not occurred?
DancingBearMD is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #27  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,770
Likes: 0
Thanks for the eagle research, DancingBear.

Possibly Saarinen looked at the facade and thought to himself: "It needs something. Too plain. I know! An immense aluminum eagle!"

He could've perched one on top of his St.Louis Arch, another structure that cries out for a little something.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=...h%20&FORM=BILH
stokebailey is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 07:37 AM
  #28  
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 9,023
Likes: 0
The Neasden Hindu Temple
Palenque is offline  
Old Feb 5th, 2010 | 07:48 AM
  #29  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,582
Likes: 0
The thing that yanks can’t get their heads around is that in 1945 Britain’s cities were very badly damaged and we had no money (having given it all to the yanks). So we needed to build housing and office spaces quickly and cheaply and reinforced concrete did the job.

They were never meant to last for ever (most were designed to last 30 years) and were often seen as simple quick fixes.

So pulling them down is a part of their planned life-cycle.
Cholmondley_Warner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kizut1659
Europe
5
Jun 18th, 2018 03:24 PM
PalenQ
Europe
15
Mar 5th, 2008 01:54 PM
MelissaBeckoff
Europe
12
Jul 7th, 2006 10:25 AM
jsmith
Europe
20
Aug 4th, 2004 10:47 AM
Hiroshi
Europe
5
Feb 20th, 2003 02:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -