Need some initial thoughts on itinerary - Dresden, Potsdam, Berlin
#41
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 57,091
Likes: 5
Ingo - thanks for the link to the Kreuzkirche - most interesting.
The singing is of course reminiscent of an english cathedral choir, though with rather fewer flounces! [and none the worse for that].
Adrienne - looks like this is working up into a vey nice trip. i look forward to your review of the Kreuzchor.
The singing is of course reminiscent of an english cathedral choir, though with rather fewer flounces! [and none the worse for that].
Adrienne - looks like this is working up into a vey nice trip. i look forward to your review of the Kreuzchor.
#43
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Saxon Switzerland is a UNESCO World Heritage Site though of course not in Dresden.
1 thing in Dresden makes this list of top 100 things in Germany ranked I believe by the German Tourist folks:
https://www.germany.travel/media/con...13_TOP_100.pdf
1 thing in Dresden makes this list of top 100 things in Germany ranked I believe by the German Tourist folks:
https://www.germany.travel/media/con...13_TOP_100.pdf
#44
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,212
Likes: 0
Saxon Switzerland must have another name since I don't see it on the list.
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/
#46

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 0
Too bad, Mainhattengirl, but you'll enjoy the Dresden Walks, too.
Dresden itself was on the UNESCO world heritage list for a while but was the first site scratched because of the construction of the infamous Waldschlösschen bridge. I'll post a bit more on this later (in a rush now.)
Dresden is going to re-enter the list with Hellerau, I guess. They have the application almost ready, it's going to take a couple of years.
The Erzgebirge mountains with the former (medieval to 20th century) mining shafts, museums, old towns and churches (Freiberg, Annaberg, Altenberg, Marienberg ... and many more, even crossing the border into Czech Rep.) will apply as UNESCO world heritage this or next year and are near Dresden (30 minutes - 1 hour are the closest sites.)
Görlitz will apply soon as well.
Bad Muskau is on the list, the only one in Saxony at the moment.
Dresden itself was on the UNESCO world heritage list for a while but was the first site scratched because of the construction of the infamous Waldschlösschen bridge. I'll post a bit more on this later (in a rush now.)
Dresden is going to re-enter the list with Hellerau, I guess. They have the application almost ready, it's going to take a couple of years.
The Erzgebirge mountains with the former (medieval to 20th century) mining shafts, museums, old towns and churches (Freiberg, Annaberg, Altenberg, Marienberg ... and many more, even crossing the border into Czech Rep.) will apply as UNESCO world heritage this or next year and are near Dresden (30 minutes - 1 hour are the closest sites.)
Görlitz will apply soon as well.
Bad Muskau is on the list, the only one in Saxony at the moment.
#48
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Dresden being de-UNESCOized must be a first - just because of some modern bridge built across the Elbe! Not saying I'm in favor of the bridge but UNESCO's actions do indeed seem a bit foolish in that one single bridge can make the difference in what is worthy of UNESCO status or not!
#49
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,212
Likes: 0
This is from the UNESCO site explaining why it was delisted.
"The World Heritage Committee decided to remove Germany's Dresden Elbe Valley from UNESCO's World Heritage List due to the building of a four-lane bridge in the heart of the cultural landscape which meant that the property failed to keep its "outstanding universal value as inscribed".
"Dresden is only the second property ever to have been removed from the World Heritage List".
They knew the city would be delisted but built the bridge anyway. Perhaps traffic easement or tourist (and other) revenue overshadowed UNESCO celebrity. After all, how many people in the world know what UNESCO signifies.
I used to collect ceramics during my travels. Now I'm "poor" I collect UNESCO sites.
http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/522
"The World Heritage Committee decided to remove Germany's Dresden Elbe Valley from UNESCO's World Heritage List due to the building of a four-lane bridge in the heart of the cultural landscape which meant that the property failed to keep its "outstanding universal value as inscribed".
"Dresden is only the second property ever to have been removed from the World Heritage List".
They knew the city would be delisted but built the bridge anyway. Perhaps traffic easement or tourist (and other) revenue overshadowed UNESCO celebrity. After all, how many people in the world know what UNESCO signifies.
I used to collect ceramics during my travels. Now I'm "poor" I collect UNESCO sites.
http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/522
#51

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 0
Ok, so Dresden was the second ever to have been removed.
Personally, I think the bridge is awful and the UNESCO did the right thing. One can argue if they overreacted, but the bridge was indeed built at a very sensitive place, very much affecting the previously unspoiled riverbanks in this area and certainly destroying one of the most beautiful views of Dresden.
What saddens me even more (than the removal from the UNESCO list) about the bridge is that it a) has proven not to be needed (only half of the predicted number of cars use it) and b) the whole thing cost about 180 Million Euro while at the same time three other existing bridges in Dresden are in (more or less urgent) need of repair.
Adrienne, on this trip you can collect future UNESCO world heritage sites ;-)
Btw, Saxon Switzerland will make the list sooner or later, too. They are in the (relatively early) process of application, together with neighbouring Bohemian Switzerland. As the number of sites that one country can suggest at once is limited, they plan to ride on the Czech ticket.
Personally, I think the bridge is awful and the UNESCO did the right thing. One can argue if they overreacted, but the bridge was indeed built at a very sensitive place, very much affecting the previously unspoiled riverbanks in this area and certainly destroying one of the most beautiful views of Dresden.
What saddens me even more (than the removal from the UNESCO list) about the bridge is that it a) has proven not to be needed (only half of the predicted number of cars use it) and b) the whole thing cost about 180 Million Euro while at the same time three other existing bridges in Dresden are in (more or less urgent) need of repair.
Adrienne, on this trip you can collect future UNESCO world heritage sites ;-)
Btw, Saxon Switzerland will make the list sooner or later, too. They are in the (relatively early) process of application, together with neighbouring Bohemian Switzerland. As the number of sites that one country can suggest at once is limited, they plan to ride on the Czech ticket.
#52
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
https://www.google.com/search?q=dres...=1600&bih=1075
The new bridge that cost Dresden its UNESCO World Heritage Site Status. Nice looking bridge but in an awful location that yes scars the nice landscape.
The new bridge that cost Dresden its UNESCO World Heritage Site Status. Nice looking bridge but in an awful location that yes scars the nice landscape.
#53
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,212
Likes: 0
I'm on UNESCO's side with this one - that's one ugly bridge! Sorry to disagree with you Pal!
Ingo - I'll get two more from Berlin and Potsdam to add to my list.
https://adriennetravels.shutterfly.com/unesco
Ingo - I'll get two more from Berlin and Potsdam to add to my list.
https://adriennetravels.shutterfly.com/unesco
#54
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Well adrienne I kind of agree with you except that when the bridge was being planned UNESCO tried to Blackmail Germany into not funding or building the bridge - a bit of thuggery if you ask me - that is what rather annoys me - the blackmail part - I do not disagree with removing somethings from the list if they no longer fulfill the requirements which would have been fine in this case.
Oh well UNESCO citation is nice but I doubt if it has made any difference to tourism in Dresden or perhaps the controversy boosted it. I have been to Dresden several times, including in old DDR days and I would return now to see this bridge - pictures can't do much - I have to take a look myself from afar and then probably agree that it is a serious desecration of an ancient city's elegant riverside facade.
Oh well UNESCO citation is nice but I doubt if it has made any difference to tourism in Dresden or perhaps the controversy boosted it. I have been to Dresden several times, including in old DDR days and I would return now to see this bridge - pictures can't do much - I have to take a look myself from afar and then probably agree that it is a serious desecration of an ancient city's elegant riverside facade.
#55

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 0
Quite an impressive list, adrienne!
The number of tourists/overnight stays in Dresden is still growing. No, the delisting doesn't have an impact on tourism in the city, it seems.
Pal, it's not that the bridge would affect the city's elegant riverside facade, this bridge affected the setting in the landscape. Where else in Europe can a river flow through a city without being canalized/regulated, green meadows and hillsides at both banks?
The number of tourists/overnight stays in Dresden is still growing. No, the delisting doesn't have an impact on tourism in the city, it seems.
Pal, it's not that the bridge would affect the city's elegant riverside facade, this bridge affected the setting in the landscape. Where else in Europe can a river flow through a city without being canalized/regulated, green meadows and hillsides at both banks?
#56
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Ingo - I agree 110% - it is the bullying that UNESCO tried that I object to - oh if you do this we will delist you - well Dresdners said fine what difference will it make - actually it may have backfired and caused locals in favor of the bridge - assumingly there were some - business interests probably - but the bridge is a desecration it does seem.
#57
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Have you been to Lutherstadt-Wittenberg? Where Luther started his rabble rousing - nice old restored town - I was first there in old DDR days and it was rundown and shabby but went back recently and shines.
Many Luther related sites including the church door he peraps apocryphally
Many Luther related sites including the church door he peraps apocryphally
#59
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,212
Likes: 0
I seems I have tons of time on this trip so will add Saxon Switzerland for a day.
I've been incredibly lazy and have not done much prep so far for this trip. I'm allocating 5 full days in Dresden. The arrival day the only thing I have planned is a nap, vespers, and dinner.
The other sights:
Dresden Walk - Old Town
Kunsthofpassage
Frauenkirche
Pfunds Molkerei
Historic and New Green Vaults
Semperoper guided tour (if available)
Zwinger
Martin Luther Church
Albertinum
Pal - Is it blasphemy to go to Germany and have no interest in Luther? Am I missing something here?
I've been incredibly lazy and have not done much prep so far for this trip. I'm allocating 5 full days in Dresden. The arrival day the only thing I have planned is a nap, vespers, and dinner.
The other sights:
Dresden Walk - Old Town
Kunsthofpassage
Frauenkirche
Pfunds Molkerei
Historic and New Green Vaults
Semperoper guided tour (if available)
Zwinger
Martin Luther Church
Albertinum
Pal - Is it blasphemy to go to Germany and have no interest in Luther? Am I missing something here?
#60
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
Pal - Is it blasphemy to go to Germany and have no interest in Luther? Am I missing something here?>
No I share the same feeling but from a historical standpoint, the launching of the Reformation it makes sites associated with that interesting. But though Wittenberge-Lutherstadt is a nice old town it is not nicer than many so if not into Luther, Heaven only knows why, then skip it.
If time Meissen again makes a nice easy half day trip from Dresden - nice castle complex on hill if not into the famous Meissen ceramics factory/tour.
No I share the same feeling but from a historical standpoint, the launching of the Reformation it makes sites associated with that interesting. But though Wittenberge-Lutherstadt is a nice old town it is not nicer than many so if not into Luther, Heaven only knows why, then skip it.
If time Meissen again makes a nice easy half day trip from Dresden - nice castle complex on hill if not into the famous Meissen ceramics factory/tour.

