Museums in London
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Museums in London
We would LOVE to linger for hours in numerous museums and galleries in London, but tht would fill too many hours. Leaning toward British Museum. Any suggesions for a second or alternative? Archaeology and historical diversity a plus.
#2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 0
The Museum of London is very well-laid out, has a diverse selection of exhibits and and media, provides an excellent overview of London's history starting with the ancients. I would say 2-3 hours would cover it.
It's just a couple of blocks from St Paul's cathedral, between St P and the Barbican.
The British Museum is overwhelming to me, I'm good for a couple of hours and then I need a cuppa. Except for the Elgin Marbles, it is not one of my favorite museums, but it is important imo to get past the first floor to see the full range of what it has to offer.
It's just a couple of blocks from St Paul's cathedral, between St P and the Barbican.
The British Museum is overwhelming to me, I'm good for a couple of hours and then I need a cuppa. Except for the Elgin Marbles, it is not one of my favorite museums, but it is important imo to get past the first floor to see the full range of what it has to offer.
#4
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
The British Museum has amazing archaeology and historic diversity - you should definitely spend time there. If you also want art, consider the National Gallery. It you prefer modern art, try the Tate Modern. If you like history and design, the Victoria & Albert is a good choice. The Fodor's London Destinations page has a good description of the museums.
#7
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
If you are interested in archaeology within London then the Museum of London is the place. They have a good collection and archaeology is a large part of their focus. The museum is well worth a trip. Check their website for special programs. The V&A is great for objects and their ceramics collection is one of the best around. I find the British Museum is best with some research beforehand so you know what you want to see and aren't just wandering aimlessly.
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
On the criteria you've given, there's only one alternative. The Museum of London has good archaeology (and is usually good on how archaeology works, as there's almost always a recent excavation featured) but it's not at all diverse. It's about London, and nothing else.
So unless there's an archaeology-inspired blockbuster (like the odd, but certainly historically diverse and long on archaeology "The Turks" currently at the Royal Academy), the only alternative to the BM is the Sir John Soane's museum in Lincoln's Inn Fields. It has reasonable archaeology, stuff from everywhere and every epoch and is capable of being seen through pretty quickly. It's one of the very few museums here you can do justice to without getting an attack of Museum Head. In fact it's really the only one, apart from the Wallace Collection, which is similarly individualistic and quirky, but is really limited to fine art.
The V+A is diverse to the point of near-insanity, but it doesn't do archaeology, apart from a few (but wonderful) excavations from Central Asia. Though if you've never been exposed to the glories of Gandharan art, this is place to discover it.
The real answer to your question, though, is to buy Time Out at the airport when you arrive (or preferably before you leave home) and go through their thumbnail sketches of the major couple of dozen museums, and their current exhibitions. Inevitably, you'll be collectively drawn to something quite different from the brief you've given us.
So unless there's an archaeology-inspired blockbuster (like the odd, but certainly historically diverse and long on archaeology "The Turks" currently at the Royal Academy), the only alternative to the BM is the Sir John Soane's museum in Lincoln's Inn Fields. It has reasonable archaeology, stuff from everywhere and every epoch and is capable of being seen through pretty quickly. It's one of the very few museums here you can do justice to without getting an attack of Museum Head. In fact it's really the only one, apart from the Wallace Collection, which is similarly individualistic and quirky, but is really limited to fine art.
The V+A is diverse to the point of near-insanity, but it doesn't do archaeology, apart from a few (but wonderful) excavations from Central Asia. Though if you've never been exposed to the glories of Gandharan art, this is place to discover it.
The real answer to your question, though, is to buy Time Out at the airport when you arrive (or preferably before you leave home) and go through their thumbnail sketches of the major couple of dozen museums, and their current exhibitions. Inevitably, you'll be collectively drawn to something quite different from the brief you've given us.
#9
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,198
Likes: 0
We enjoyed the 200 Treasures Room at the British Library. It has the Gutenburg Bible, Magna Carta, original manuscripts from Handel, Mozart, the Beatles and Lewis Carroll (Alice in Wonderland). It made a memorable stop on a rainy afternoon.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seetheworld
Europe
34
May 31st, 2006 05:14 PM





