Long URLs
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Long URLs
Hi all,
The Fodor's computer can't handle long URLs.
The formatting gets all messed up.
If your URL won't fit into the width of the Reply box, please copy it to www.tinyurl.com and post the short URL here.
Thank you.
The Fodor's computer can't handle long URLs.
The formatting gets all messed up.
If your URL won't fit into the width of the Reply box, please copy it to www.tinyurl.com and post the short URL here.
Thank you.
#3
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Ira thanks for the reminder. But there are cases where long URL's don't cause the problem like the followings. I don't make a space between two lines and just paste a copy the whole URL.
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34925717
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34906885
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34925717
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34906885
#6
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
How about going ahead and pasting long URLs, thereby causing posters to write nasty letters to the editors, thereby maybe eventually possibly getting it fixed?
I have published the solution many times: display only the server name as link text, and hide the rest within the anchor tag!
This would be rendered thus:
<a href="http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...s.com<a>
The only part of the above that would be visible is the http://www.fodors.com
I have published the solution many times: display only the server name as link text, and hide the rest within the anchor tag!
This would be rendered thus:
<a href="http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...s.com<a>
The only part of the above that would be visible is the http://www.fodors.com
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
Does that invisible link actually work? If it doesn't show up does it still take up space somewhere?
Do you suppose there could be a reason why the Editors have decided not to "fix" this "problem?"
If there is, do you think they might let us know what it is?
Do you suppose there could be a reason why the Editors have decided not to "fix" this "problem?"
If there is, do you think they might let us know what it is?
#10
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 0
My experience is that many apparently long URLs don't mess up the formatting. I test them by previewing, and if they do, then I use tinyurl.
Check out the long URL I used at
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34941714
Check out the long URL I used at
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34941714
#12
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Here is how grownups do links: http://tinyurl.com/2lzxzd
#14
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi trav,
Paste your long link and then break it up by hitting the "enter" key.
It will require the reader to copy and paste the sections.
Why are you using your employer's resources to fiddle away your life here?

Paste your long link and then break it up by hitting the "enter" key.
It will require the reader to copy and paste the sections.
Why are you using your employer's resources to fiddle away your life here?

#15
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
There is no way to tell if a url is too long because people have different size screens, fonts, and screen resolutions, so it does make things easier to use a small url. Try citebite. There are lots of small url sites, but the nice thing about citebite is that it lets you highlight a specific bit of text. This link will take you to a Fodors page about the Grand Canyon; the yellow highlighted text was chosen by me - it is not part of the original page.
http://pages.citebite.com/f1g0r4k4s2nvf
http://pages.citebite.com/f1g0r4k4s2nvf
#17
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
It's not their computer that can't handle long URLs. It's their server script.
Fodor's probably have a reason for MAKING US DO THEIR WORK FOR THEM, but I can't imagine what it might be.
There is no excuse for the "long URL problem" in the first place. Fixing it in the server script would take a few minutes to code and test. With time for coffee and cake. It's already designed.
p.s I just noticed there's a bug in my proposed solution. Anybody spot it?
Fodor's probably have a reason for MAKING US DO THEIR WORK FOR THEM, but I can't imagine what it might be.
There is no excuse for the "long URL problem" in the first place. Fixing it in the server script would take a few minutes to code and test. With time for coffee and cake. It's already designed.
p.s I just noticed there's a bug in my proposed solution. Anybody spot it?

