Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

London-Cromwell Road-Walks

Search

London-Cromwell Road-Walks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12th, 2003 | 04:35 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
London-Cromwell Road-Walks

I will be in London 09-17 through 09-30. I will be staying on Cromwell Road near the Earl's Court tube station. I was wondering which of the following sites would you consider "walking distance" (I am 50 y.o. and in very healthy) from this area. Any I should cross off my list?

Holland Park & Cricket Fields (when do they play cricket there?)

Kensington Gardens and Palace
Hyde Park
Science Musem & Natural History Museum
Victoria & Albert Hall
Harrod's
Royal Albert Hall

I appreciate any and all input.

Thanking you in advance for your kindnesses,

Ron
Dietdoctor is offline  
Old Aug 12th, 2003 | 04:47 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
Ron, when we go to London, we walk, walk and then, walk some more. Sure we occasionally (to make time or if we're tired) hop a double-decker or dip into the tube.

A good part of the fun, in our view, is the "getting there", soaking up the atmosphere of the various neighborhoods. The "means" to the "end" is often more important than that "end".

Therefore, in my opinion, you can and should, walk to all on your list. (This fits in with another answer I gave to you regarding the Travel Card.)
TuckH is offline  
Old Aug 12th, 2003 | 05:13 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Speaking as someone rather older, and probably a great deal less fit than the poster, I'm puzzled about why the question is being asked.

All of them are in easy walking distance. Unless you're suffering from some serious incapacity, the weather's unpleasant, or you've got luggage or heavy shopping, you'd be nuts to travel any other way. If traffic's light, cabs'd be quicker (if diet doctoring pays well these days). But for such nearby places, buses or tubes would almost always work out at least as time-consuming as walking.

Something so obvious from any map, dietdoctor mustn't have a map handy. Go to multimap.com, and input your hotel's postcode. Then plan some serious walking.
flanneruk is offline  
Old Aug 12th, 2003 | 05:24 AM
  #4  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,374
Likes: 0
The furthest to walk is probably the Albert Hall from Earl's Court, and that would maybe be half an hour's walk.
Tulips is offline  
Old Aug 12th, 2003 | 05:45 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
Picking up on flanner's criticism:

A lot of the fun of travel is the time spent in research and planning leading up to the trip...
TuckH is offline  
Old Aug 12th, 2003 | 05:49 AM
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Question answered! Thanks so much, TuckH and Tulip! You are most kind and, as always, very informative.
Dietdoctor is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dallison
Europe
31
Dec 18th, 2009 10:02 AM
PatrickLondon
Europe
23
Dec 1st, 2008 08:09 AM
jturner
Europe
18
Aug 3rd, 2004 04:11 PM
PatrickLondon
Europe
9
Oct 9th, 2003 02:52 PM
Harrie
Europe
14
Apr 12th, 2003 05:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -