Search

How much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:02 AM
  #21  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Rufus,
that is priceless. Thanks!

This post is wonderful. Mille grazie, Viaggio. Lei e molto divertimenti!
wanderlust5 is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Mary Fran, you need a map.

VS
viaggio_sempre is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #23  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Less is more.
ira is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #24  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
More or less.
ira is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #25  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
More than last time but less than next.
laughingd2 is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #26  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Much too much.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #27  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
A little less would be more than enough.

:-"
viaggio_sempre is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #28  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,821
Likes: 0
Viaggio_sempre

Please be more specific. Do you mean:

How: in what way, to what degree, by what method, in what manner, according to what specifications, from what source, by whose help, whence, wherewith, by virtue of what, whereby, through what agency or by what means?

Much: important, weighty, notable, considerable, prominent, memorable, momentous, stirring, eventful, serious, urgent, pressing, critical, paramount, principal, leading, significant, telling, first-rate, in the front rank, in great quantity, full, many, very many, adequate, abundant, satisfying, enough, sufficient, considerable, substantial, ample, everywhere, copious, voluminous, plentiful, profuse, complete, lavish, generous, immerasurable, endless, countless, extravagant, hell of a lot, all over the place, and no end.

Those of us who are regular contributors can only help you if you help yourself. No offense intended and with all due respect, the more information you offer the better we can waste your time with our own version of the truth.
brotherleelove2004 is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #29  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Yeah, what he said........
bakergirl is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #30  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Much more!
Brazilnut is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #31  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
As my daddy used to say, "six of one, half a dozen of the other".
BabsB is offline  
Old Mar 17th, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #32  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Twenty-eight point three six eight megatons.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Mar 18th, 2006 | 06:01 AM
  #33  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841 97169399375105820974944592
ira is offline  
Old Mar 18th, 2006 | 06:16 AM
  #34  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Ideally....more than I can spend!
ahotpoet is offline  
Old Mar 19th, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #35  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 0
Robespierre,

MEGATONS! Yeah, now you are speaking my language. Nobody speaks in Megatons any more, thank God!

By the way, 28.3 is a REALLY big one, as those things go.

nukesafe is offline  
Old Mar 19th, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #36  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
That's the punchline from a duck 'n' cover-era joke.

The Civil Defense council held a public meeting to air issues that concerned citizens might have about nuclear warfare.

There were Air Force generals, and statesmen, and scientists on the panel, and each in turn spoke on the topic of his or her speciality.

A nuclear scientist was discussing how large "devices" needed to be to produce certain blast effects, and a member of the audience asked how big one would have to be to vaporize New York.

So the scientists got out their slide rules and calculated for twenty or thirty seconds and their spokesman said, "Somewhere between eight and nine megatons."

"So how about Los Angeles?"

"Well, that's much more spread out, plus you have the factor of the mountains..." and they put their heads together for another computation. "Something on the order of fourteen to sixteen megatons" was the reply.

"Thank you. How about, say, Moscow?"

Without hesitation, the Air Force general stood up and said...
Robespierre is offline  
Old Mar 19th, 2006 | 04:46 PM
  #37  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,821
Likes: 0
Without hesitation, the Air Force general stood up and said...

"Idaho or Russia?"
brotherleelove2004 is offline  
Old Mar 19th, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #38  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Moscow, <u>Idaho</u>? A medium-sized IED would probably handle it.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Mar 19th, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
And the winner is....

Brotherleelove, for his typical-of-a-real-regular-information-giving first response. You will receive a pie-in-the-face for your efforts.

Second runner-up will be divided between those that rode the nuclear bomb to the ground. You have your reward.

I have nothing to offer the rest of us.

SV
viaggio_sempre is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nysmom
Europe
43
Jul 6th, 2008 04:57 PM
THERESA10
Europe
8
Dec 30th, 2005 03:44 PM
marmaduke
United States
36
Jul 19th, 2004 10:32 AM
GOL
United States
8
Jan 23rd, 2003 09:13 AM
alwayslate24
Europe
4
Jul 19th, 2002 12:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -