Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Eurostar question

Search

Eurostar question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28th, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Eurostar question

I will be traveling with my two teenage children and husband from London to Paris. Our travel package with Solar Tours included a flight from Heathrow to Charles de Gaulle. We are staying right by the Arc De Triomphe.
My question is this: Do you suggest forgeting the flight and purchasing tickets on the train? I can get a standard fare on the first train out for 350.00 for the four of us through www.eurostar.com.
magialmemories is offline  
Old Nov 28th, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,523
Likes: 0
Well, one factor in the decision will be the inconvenience of flying. Get to the airport, check-in, security and at the other end pcik up bags, get into city..
While for Eurostar, city centre to city centre, and views of the countryside. I'd bet that overall you will save time versus plane even though the actual air time is shorter than the train travel time.
That would be $350 and not £350?
Michel_Paris is offline  
Old Nov 28th, 2007 | 04:11 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Sorry..yes 350.00 us
magialmemories is offline  
Old Nov 29th, 2007 | 03:11 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Another vote for Eurostar over flights. In addition to minimum 3-4hrs "wasted" going to/getting from airports, likely delay at LHR take-off, check-in time ahead of departure, time to retrieve luggages, you'll also have to consider transportation costs to/from the airports.

$350 for four equates c.£40 per person, which i think is a pretty darn good fare. Minimum check-in time for Eurostar for regular class is 30 min, but I've noticed there are teething glitches at St Panc, so I'd add another 15min or so, and another 15min for picking up tickets from the automated machines. Still much less stress than flying. Plus you're right in the centre of Paris at Gare du Nord.
W9London is offline  
Old Nov 29th, 2007 | 03:14 AM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,269
Likes: 0
If you're London-based, and there's no issue about connecting from a flight from elsewhere, then there's no question in my mind.

Eurostar all the way: much less hassle and stress than getting to and from flights, and you can stretch your legs while on the journey.
PatrickLondon is offline  
Old Nov 29th, 2007 | 05:40 AM
  #6  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi M,

$350 for 4 is a very good price.

ira is offline  
Old Nov 29th, 2007 | 06:05 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,641
Likes: 0
Have you already paid for the flight from LHR to CDG--you say it was "included" in the package. If you have to pay extra for that flight, skip it and take the train.
But if the flight is already paid for, then I'd consider taking it despite the benefits of going by Eurostar. Esp. if you are coming into LHR from somewhere else and then connecting on to Paris that same day.
BTilke is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Susanne07
Europe
11
Aug 26th, 2008 05:34 AM
WillTravel
Europe
5
Jun 6th, 2008 10:47 AM
retiredinflorida
Europe
10
Jan 22nd, 2006 03:03 PM
SaveThePanda
Europe
19
Jul 30th, 2004 06:25 PM
Franm
Europe
7
Sep 13th, 2003 07:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -