Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

European healthcare

Search

European healthcare

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 01:29 PM
  #281  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And politicians, basingstoke2, have a way of ignoring the liabilities they promise. Lest I be reminded that we are spending billions (trillions?, quadrillions?) on a war, it is true for cities, towns, counties, states and countries. The bill will come due be it San Diego (oh, that one did come due), California, US, UK or France.
jsmith is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:15 PM
  #282  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
danon: this WHO survey (and in the end it is just one survey) didn't said that the people in the other countries were unhappy - just that the Americans were the happiest and most satisfied.

robjame: you asked "if you didn't use a "bunch" of matrices how would you evaluate?"

My point was that the particular weighting that WHO chose to put on the survey wouldn't have been my choice. Automobiles have lots of attributes too - do you think it is strange that different people prefer different cars? Or should we all choose the car that you prefer because that's the obvious best choice?
bobludlow is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:33 PM
  #283  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
> I think it makes more sense to look at total health care expenditures (both per person and as a share of national income), including both public and private spending. An Excel spreadsheet with those numbers is available herelt;

Thanks for the data, J.

Hi SM,

>Ira - Society is subsidizing your Medicare, that is why it appears less expensive than your private coverage.<

Sonderbar!! I hadn't thought of that.

My point, dear colleague, is that my employer and I paid 17% of my income for medical care. Is that higher or lower than we would have paid for equivalent coverage in France?

>Do you believe that we could magically transition to a massive single-payor socialized system without giving that up? <

Are you sure that we wouldn't, Bob?

>Each individual receiving Medicare is supported by multiple workers that are ineligible.<

Hey SM, that's the whole point of insurance. The risk is spread among a large population.

As noted above, I pay for other people's kids to go to school. They grow up to pay for my Social Security, Medicare, Pension (whether public or private), etc.

Also, those other workers aren't "ineligible"; they are "not yet eligible".

ira is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:35 PM
  #284  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The word "Socialist" and the phrase "socialized medicine" are being thrown around a lot.

Anyone care to define these terms?

ira is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:39 PM
  #285  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"But if you are not a patient, how can you express your satisfaction?????"

- The "key informants" used in the survey mentioned but not cited by bobludlow were not even patients - they were toilers in the health sectors of the countries concerned. Put another way, they were the producers, not the consumers. That's how I read it, anyway. For those interested it can be found at www.who.int/healthinfo/paper22.pdf. Be warned though that it's eye-glazing stuff and a statistician's wet dream.

For myself, I'm not sure I'd want to be part of a system in which the people insuring me apparently spend so much of their time and money trying to avoid paying the bill, assuming they haven't dodged insuring me in the first place.

Most Australians are strong supporters of our universal insurance and subsidised medicines schemes. They'd be surprised to find themselves described as "socialists", but I've noticed that the term is often applied rather liberally in the United States.
Neil_Oz is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:41 PM
  #286  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In American public discourse "socialist" means something like "liberal", only worse. In other words, any political belief that presumes that the state has any more purpose than defence.

If you want to meet real socialists, come to Europe. We still have some.
Padraig is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:49 PM
  #287  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>any political belief that presumes that the state has any more purpose than defence.<

And why should I accept that the purpose of the State is defense?

We have the right to keep and bear arms; why do we need to pay taxes to a bunch of politicians to maintain a military force?

Damn bunch of socialist liberals.

ira is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 02:54 PM
  #288  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or is that liberal socialists?
ira is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 03:07 PM
  #289  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We even have self-called liberals, Padraig (but no one believes them..they are just conservatives)
kenderina is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 03:33 PM
  #290  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A lot of American socialists I guess.
And to answer smueller...

“A majority of Americans [64%] say the federal government should guarantee health insurance to every American, especially children, and are willing to pay higher taxes to do it, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll” March 2007

http://tinyurl.com/37lwnw
robjame is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 03:48 PM
  #291  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 15,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
robjame,
everyone knows that New York Times, CBS,NBC, ABC ... are members of the liberal ( 'socialist&quot media.
The only information to be believed comes from the ... fair and balanced .. and radio bla bla bla
danon is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 04:16 PM
  #292  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
danon, I just love satire and irony!
jody is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 05:04 PM
  #293  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18,618
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jsmith- Can't argue your point about politicians and bills coming due.
basingstoke2 is online now  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 05:32 PM
  #294  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May I ask a question, please excuse me if it has been already answered or if I am confused about which country has which type of coverage......

If a national health care system is superior (in some peoples eyes) than why do others opt to purchase private insurance along with their national insurance coverage, i.e. UK citizens?
ElaineF is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 05:49 PM
  #295  
sjj
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
National health programs often offer limited coverage, for example poor dental insurance and shared rather than private rooms in hospitals. People in countries with programs like this usually take out extra insurance, just as Americans on Medicare often buy supplementary insurance if they don't have retiree benefits from their employer.
sjj is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 05:51 PM
  #296  
esd
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would rather be right here in America, thank you!

My husbands family live in Italy and we've visited there often and I know the medical history/experiences of all his family. Have they received some good care?..of course. Have they not? Yes to that, too.

Years ago I went with a niece to a local doctors office. We walked into a large, crowded waiting room. She asked who was before her and that was who she was to keep track of so as to know when it was her turn. While waiting a girl came in crying..she'd stepped on a hypodermic needle in the sand at a nearby beach. Everyone was very sympathetic and she was told by all that she could be next. We never saw any personnel..as one came out from seeing the doctor, another went in.

Different, but it worked. HOWEVER, anyone with any money and/or a serious illness goes through their private system if possible and not the free-for-everyone government plan.

I want to point out too that when my husband had cancer treatments a few years ago (he's been fine since) he went to Atlanta...as did a number of Europeans that we met while there. I wonder if that scenario is ever reversed..I doubt it.

Would I be 'afraid' to be treated over there if I were there and had to be? Of course not! Would I 'rather' be there than here and sick? No way!
esd is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 05:58 PM
  #297  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 15,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
National health care coverage does not include everything related to health care.
Private insurance may cover drugs outside the hospital, dental care, private hospital room , glasses, physiotherapy. braces, and similar
Often the cost of this additional private insurance is shared by the employer and the employee.

danon is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 06:12 PM
  #298  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just as i suspected sjj. I wonder if any
of the brits or any other non usa-national (who praise their national health scheme) on the board elect to have private insurance?

...and why would they pick to have private insurance? do they feel more comfortable with the 'extra'...Another question...doesnt the private only allow you to shorter wait times and to see certain doctors that allow for private insurance?

ElaineF is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 06:14 PM
  #299  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks danon
ElaineF is offline  
Old Aug 15th, 2007, 06:53 PM
  #300  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me guess esd - you are not one of the 40+ million with no health insurance.

Elaine - I think you may have misunderstood what sjj told you.
I have supplemental insurance in Canada. It does not give me quicker service. It gives me an opportunity for a double room instead of a ward (4 person) room in hospital.
The major reason I have it is for the 5 months a year that I spend in the US. The extra cost if I should fall ill or have an accident there would bankrupt me as my Health Insurance only reimburses me outside of the Province for the amount of the equivalent cost in Ontario. It would provide air ambulance home etc.
These services are deemed to be outside the basic coverage.

Basic coverage is guaranteed for every citizen (and sometimes provided even for non-citizens)
robjame is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -