do you usually spend more on hotels in london?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you usually spend more on hotels in london?
hello.i am choosing a hotel for our first trip to london.we usually travel on a budget.
i have used tripadvisor.com in the past to get hotel reviews.what i noticed however is that London hotels get *much* much harsher reviews than similarly priced ones on the continent. 85€ hotels were decribed as dumps having staff from hell. is it a case of higher expectations for those who visit london or do you need to spend twice the amountto get the same standard of hotel?thanks
i have used tripadvisor.com in the past to get hotel reviews.what i noticed however is that London hotels get *much* much harsher reviews than similarly priced ones on the continent. 85€ hotels were decribed as dumps having staff from hell. is it a case of higher expectations for those who visit london or do you need to spend twice the amountto get the same standard of hotel?thanks
#2
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes! That's why London is the first place I started seeking out apartments and have never looked back.
You can find a REALLY nice hotel in Paris in a great location for $200 US. In London, that's a real stretch. I'm not saying that you can't find one for that, but it won't be spacious, it won't have much charm, and it probably won't be in a great location (to me!).
You can find a REALLY nice hotel in Paris in a great location for $200 US. In London, that's a real stretch. I'm not saying that you can't find one for that, but it won't be spacious, it won't have much charm, and it probably won't be in a great location (to me!).
#4
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you need a lot of dosh to get a decent place. figure the pound is worth at least 1.8 times the dollar, and around 35% or so more than the Euro. an 85E hotel translates to about 60 pounds for a hotel, and yes, that's a dive.
a 100-120 pound hotel is maybe about where the decent stuff starts (not posh, just decent) and that translates to about 150-170E. (this is leaving priceline out of the equation).
a 100-120 pound hotel is maybe about where the decent stuff starts (not posh, just decent) and that translates to about 150-170E. (this is leaving priceline out of the equation).
#5
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
right - like Patrick said - 170E or so will be a bit more than 200 bucks - and you will have a very nice place in Paris.
120 pounds on the other hand, will find you something small, clean, and only maybe a good location if you use londontown.com like I did for this upcoming trip.
120 pounds on the other hand, will find you something small, clean, and only maybe a good location if you use londontown.com like I did for this upcoming trip.
#7
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for restos, you used to be able to say that you could just swap the dollar sign for the pound and the price-numbers would be about the same for the same type of restos/food. (i.e. you are spending 1.8 times on the food, entertainment, etc.) I don't think this follows for hotels however!
#9
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know what plans you have already made, but sometimes the packages on sites like go-today.com, gate1travel, or the virgin-atlantic vacations are of value. You can often find air and hotel for 6 or so nights at prices you might expect to pay for the hotel alone. Read the fine print so you understand any restrictions, and be sure to check the hotel location on a London street map.
#11
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I found an incredible bargain this summer with of all places, Claridges! The Savoy Hotel group was running a special of 299 pounds a night for two enormous bedrooms, two baths at either Claridges or The Berkeley. Sometimes you can get lucky even in London!
#12
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you usually travel on a budget, I'd guess you're not accustomed to spending $200 US on a REALLY nice hotel in Paris.
We've traveled twice to London on a budget. The first time, we ended up in a bit dumpy, but not horrible, little hotel with a separate bathroom down the hall (the shower/toilet were separate from one another, and both were shared with the entire floor). I wouldn't do that again, though we did survive! This was in 1996 and we spent ~50GBP for the room.
In 2003 we pricelined a room (got the Thistle Kensington Palace) for $60 US/night, taxes included. It was a great place. I would use priceline again in a heartbeat! I'll gladly sacrifice knowing up front where I'll be staying for that kind of savings, as long as I stick with high end hotels.
We've traveled twice to London on a budget. The first time, we ended up in a bit dumpy, but not horrible, little hotel with a separate bathroom down the hall (the shower/toilet were separate from one another, and both were shared with the entire floor). I wouldn't do that again, though we did survive! This was in 1996 and we spent ~50GBP for the room.
In 2003 we pricelined a room (got the Thistle Kensington Palace) for $60 US/night, taxes included. It was a great place. I would use priceline again in a heartbeat! I'll gladly sacrifice knowing up front where I'll be staying for that kind of savings, as long as I stick with high end hotels.
#16
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try a search on The Morgan Hotel. It is in Bloomsbury and there have been many good reviews on it here and on Trip Advisor. I had a room booked for 68GBP for a single including breakfast. I did not stay there because my plans changed, but I did go by there and it looks nice.
#18
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd take that last statement from mgmargate with a giant grain of salt.
You could have the most exquisitely decorated and furnished hotel you ever saw in France. It could have huge, spacious rooms and be fine in every detail. Yet if they do not happen to have a full scale restaurant, they can not get a rating higher than 3 stars. The star system ONLY has to do with the amenities offered by a hotel. The stars reflect everything from whether of not all rooms have private baths, to what meals are served, to whether there is an elevator, to if the hotel offers room service. There are many, many truly magnificent 3 star hotels in Europe. The star rating (particularly in France) has NOTHING to do with the quality or even the cleanliness of the hotel, only the amenties they offer.
You could have the most exquisitely decorated and furnished hotel you ever saw in France. It could have huge, spacious rooms and be fine in every detail. Yet if they do not happen to have a full scale restaurant, they can not get a rating higher than 3 stars. The star system ONLY has to do with the amenities offered by a hotel. The stars reflect everything from whether of not all rooms have private baths, to what meals are served, to whether there is an elevator, to if the hotel offers room service. There are many, many truly magnificent 3 star hotels in Europe. The star rating (particularly in France) has NOTHING to do with the quality or even the cleanliness of the hotel, only the amenties they offer.
#20
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<i>"The star rating (particularly in France) has NOTHING to do with the quality or even the cleanliness of the hotel, only the amenties they offer."</i>
That's why Americans need to be aware of the differences in the star-ratings. In the US, stars represent quality. Most 3-star hotels in the US are decent places to stay. The same cannot always be said of 3-star hotels in Europe. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with the rating system in Europe - but people just need to be aware of the differences.
I am normally perfectly content staying in a 3-star room in the US. But in London, we look in the 4-star range to get comparable quality.
That's why Americans need to be aware of the differences in the star-ratings. In the US, stars represent quality. Most 3-star hotels in the US are decent places to stay. The same cannot always be said of 3-star hotels in Europe. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with the rating system in Europe - but people just need to be aware of the differences.
I am normally perfectly content staying in a 3-star room in the US. But in London, we look in the 4-star range to get comparable quality.