Copenhagen, Berlin, Prague Itinerary 10-12 days
#21



Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,080
Likes: 50
Cowboy1968 made my point better than I did. ANY two cities are doable. Don't pick two simply because they are easy by train -- UNLESS those two cities call to you. If you have always dreamed of visiting two cities that are farther apart - the same length of travel would be involved . . . close/close-ish = train, farther away = fly.
The rail system and budget European airline make just about any two cities a reasonable itinerary. Don't tie yourself to trains . . . UNLESS two cities you'd love to visit are convenient by train.
The rail system and budget European airline make just about any two cities a reasonable itinerary. Don't tie yourself to trains . . . UNLESS two cities you'd love to visit are convenient by train.
#22
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
I don't think there is the magic combination of two cities.
IF someone has a strong priority for ease of travel, I agree that choosing two cities close to each other and connected by rail is a good choice.
Yes we agree and also agree yes they can fly between any two cities at not that much more time but much more hassle - getting out to airport and all but yes not that much more but if a Paris and Amsterdam or Venice and Rome, etc then taking train once on your trip could be fun - seeing more than airport and tarmacs. But yes all of Europe is at your disposal as long as your destination city has an airport - many do not.
IF someone has a strong priority for ease of travel, I agree that choosing two cities close to each other and connected by rail is a good choice.
Yes we agree and also agree yes they can fly between any two cities at not that much more time but much more hassle - getting out to airport and all but yes not that much more but if a Paris and Amsterdam or Venice and Rome, etc then taking train once on your trip could be fun - seeing more than airport and tarmacs. But yes all of Europe is at your disposal as long as your destination city has an airport - many do not.
#24
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
I don't think there is the magic combination of two cities.
IF someone has a strong priority for ease of travel, I agree that choosing two cities close to each other and connected by rail is a good choice.>
Not my quote but Cowboy's who said it all for you. So you are disagreeing with cowboy not me. My fault was in neglecting to put in quote marks as I usually do. I agree with cowboy and you now do not where before you said you did!
IF someone has a strong priority for ease of travel, I agree that choosing two cities close to each other and connected by rail is a good choice.>
Not my quote but Cowboy's who said it all for you. So you are disagreeing with cowboy not me. My fault was in neglecting to put in quote marks as I usually do. I agree with cowboy and you now do not where before you said you did!
#25



Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,080
Likes: 50
Cowboy meant there was no magic in choosing two cities simply BECAUSE they are near each other and easy by train. He said >>But IF someone wanted to see very different cities on his/her first time visit, I think he/she should "sacrifice" a few of those precious hours to get what they want.<<
So no, I was not disagreeing w/ cowboy, but agreeing with him . .
So no, I was not disagreeing w/ cowboy, but agreeing with him . .
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smithgardner
Europe
4
Mar 15th, 2010 08:00 PM
Wekiva
Europe
13
Nov 8th, 2007 09:19 AM




