Cinque Terre
#3
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,369
Likes: 0
Yeah, two nights makes it much less stressful to be able to hike one full day and not worry about needing to depart the same day. I stayed in Levanto the time I visited the CT (three nights) only because I couldn't reserve ahead of time what I thought I needed in a lodging; going back again I'd probably stay in Vernazza or Riomaggiore.
You don't NEED a car, either - the trains take you efficiently between the five towns.
You don't NEED a car, either - the trains take you efficiently between the five towns.
#4
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
My husband and I stayed in Manarola 3 years ago. Absolutely loved it. I would stay there again as it is quieter than some of the other towns. We hiked to Vernazza then took the ferry down to Riomaggiore and walked back to Manarola. 2 nights would be good, of course more is better!
#5
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
If you are arriving from Arezzo, you will not likely get to the CT very early, assuming you will be traveling by train. We were surprised how long it took from Florence and you will have to go through it on your way. At best you would arrive and have only a half day and then be thinking of departure after your single night.
My experience has led me to suggest at least two nights and preferably three. This allows the exploration and movement between towns which makes the area so attractive. In spite of our desire to return, we have declined when we have not had adequate time to explore and relax.
Good luck.
My experience has led me to suggest at least two nights and preferably three. This allows the exploration and movement between towns which makes the area so attractive. In spite of our desire to return, we have declined when we have not had adequate time to explore and relax.
Good luck.




