Car or Train for 2 weeks in Europe?

Old Dec 21st, 2018 | 07:47 AM
  #41  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 49,560
Likes: 0
<<I think car is almost every time the best option. You have much more storage space, and you can travel around freelly>>

Hogwash. A car is an enormous liability if you are spending any time at all in European cities. Wonderful for traveling around the countryside.

The storage space note confounds me. If you're traveling, you have suitcases and bags, presumably. Everything has to fit inside them, whether you're in a car, in a train or bus, or on foot. So what if you can spread some stuff all over a rental car - it all has to be gathered up and repacked for transport when you're done with the car, so what's your point?
StCirq is offline  
Old Dec 21st, 2018 | 07:55 AM
  #42  
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
All this presupposes that you have your reservation for Thalys booked already. It's not as if you can take any Belgian train and then hop on any Thalys train. Your stuck to a reservation for that.>

Thaks for clarification - I should have said that better. I think you can only get the ABS fare in conjunction with a Thalys fare with reservation.
PalenQ is offline  
Old Jan 1st, 2019 | 02:47 PM
  #43  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,094
Likes: 1
Personally, we would find "train" to be extremely limiting.
Largely because, to us, all big cities look about the same (tall buildings, traffic, large stores), other than their unique features (think Tower of London, Eiffel Tower).
Contrast that to small towns/villages, each with a unique flavor.

Given what you've divulged, I'd heartily recommend rental car. (we use www.gemut.com)
tomboy is offline  
Old Jan 4th, 2019 | 07:37 PM
  #44  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,942
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tomboy
Personally, we would find "train" to be extremely limiting.
Largely because, to us, all big cities look about the same (tall buildings, traffic, large stores), other than their unique features (think Tower of London, Eiffel Tower).
Contrast that to small towns/villages, each with a unique flavor.

Given what you've divulged, I'd heartily recommend rental car. (we use www.gemut.com)
Trains stations are not only to be found in "big cities"
menachem is offline  
Old Jan 4th, 2019 | 09:02 PM
  #45  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 27,709
Likes: 1
Largely because, to us, all big cities look about the same
Really? Cities look pretty different to me. I would never confuse London and Lisbon, New York and DC, Paris and Prague, etc. etc. Whereas one small village with thatched cottages and a pub is much like the next. And if it rains there is a lot more do in a city.

Of course menachem is right. Take a look at a rail map sometime. And then there are buses.
thursdaysd is offline  
Old Jan 4th, 2019 | 10:11 PM
  #46  
kja
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 25,749
Likes: 0
IME, thursdaysd raises an excellent point. I can't imagine confusing any city I've visited for another. In contrast, my tolerance for small villages (with or without thatch) is limited and my memories of them merge into a bit of a mishmash. Maybe others experience it differently.

Either way, as others have noted, there are many parts of Europe in which visiting smaller towns or villages is quite easy by public transportation.
kja is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
katutubo
Europe
13
May 31st, 2018 07:01 AM
butterfingers
Europe
16
Mar 30th, 2018 03:23 PM
maxz
Europe
6
Sep 3rd, 2015 09:47 PM
darcey
Europe
20
Feb 5th, 2007 03:10 PM
darcey
United States
5
Jan 23rd, 2007 08:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -