Search

British Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 03:44 PM
  #1  
Tina
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
British Air

Hi everyone, my husband and I are flying to germany nonstop on British Air.We will be flying on a 747-400. Does anyone know how the leg room is on these planes? How is the service,food? I tried their we-site.
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 04:48 PM
  #2  
Sylvia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Tina, I haven't flown many other airlines to Europe, so I don't know how leg room compares to other carriers. I do know that BA keeps you pretty well entertained--newsreels, Tv shows, movies, practically non-stop. Besides dinner and breakfast, there will be snacks (ice cream bars tend to be a favorite), and lots of juice and water gets handed out. I think you'll be pretty happy with that. I'm glad you're going nonstop. I prefer to do it that way--once you're done, you're done.
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 04:58 PM
  #3  
Leslie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
From any destination in the US, if you fly BA (British Airways, not British Air), you must stop and change planes in London. BA must fly through its home base, which is London.
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 05:18 PM
  #4  
Christina
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BA has really small seats and not much leg room, about the smallest in the business except for the real discount airlines like Ryanair. I've seen stats several places that say it is 31" seat pitch and 17-1/4" seat width on their 747s. I just flew one in June and they were really really small, however, that's about the same as some other major carriers, I guess (like Air France). I just booked a ticket on them next week because of a fairly good deal (and I was going to London, Virgin was no better) and chose a flight that was a 767 because I read they have a little more seat space on those planes. Their web site is a little secretive about that, as I recall, I had to get the information some other place. Service and food was okay, I guess, although some of their staff at Heathrow seemed a bit snappish.
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 06:19 PM
  #5  
Genny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Tina, we flew BA on the old 747 five yrs. ago and then last year on the new 747.<BR><BR>Believe it or not we liked the old 747 for the legroom which really is not that much but we were so cramped in the new 747 that it felt as though they put more seats into that plane. I'm sure that's not the case-it just felt tight. The food was also better in the years past. Service was not professional - my son had an airsick accident and the steward refused to dispose of the bag for us. Can you imagine?
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 08:22 PM
  #6  
Denise
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Flew BA from Heathrow to Milan. They lost my luggage which is a problem in itself. While I can understand this happens, it was frustrating to try to find a "live" person with any answers. They told me a lot of "BS" (luggage will be there in the morning, etc, never called back as they said they would, and never told me I should go and get some clothes. Also gave me a number to call that was out of service. Kept me thinking the luggage was on the way. Finally 3 days later it arrived after we went to the airport to find it ourselves. The plane was fine, a bit bumpier both going and returning compared to American airlines (Heathrow to NYC) less legroom and just decent snacks. Still haven't heard from their customer relations dept so the jury is till out on them.<BR><BR>Denise
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 08:23 PM
  #7  
Pat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does anyone know if the 777s have more room than the 747s? What about BA's<BR>economy-plus seating? How much better is that?
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 08:27 PM
  #8  
Rex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BeWARE of their TIGHTLY ENFORCED five kg limit on carry-on bags.<BR><BR>I don't remember anything else good or bad about flying them (in 1999), JFK to LHR.<BR><BR>Best wishes,<BR><BR>Rex<BR>
 
Old Aug 11th, 2002, 08:53 PM
  #9  
elvira
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The 777 didn't seem to have anymore room per person than the 747 - it's a bigger plane, so they just add extra seats to fly more people.<BR><BR>I flew BAB a year ago, food's not as good as it used to be, but as a whole it's a better flight than other airlines provide. Only fly steerage, so I can't compare their first class to others.<BR><BR>Maybe there's an economy class out there with significantly better leg room and seat width, but I've never found it. I'm a small to average size woman and every seat gives me barely 3" leeway and absolutely no room for my legs. DON'T EVER sit in the row in front of the movie screen; sure, lots of leg room, but everyone uses it to cross over to the other aisle so you constantly get kicked, stepped on, bumped...after the 35th "oh sorry", the extra leg room loses its appeal.<BR><BR>
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 01:33 AM
  #10  
xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Economy is fine but small similar to ALL airlines these days. Traveller Plus (their extra leg-room economy) is just that... and a big help for my 6'2" husband (but depends on whether you want to pay the extra cost). I find the food and service on BA to be far superior to United.
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 04:22 AM
  #11  
janine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Flown British Air many times. Leg room seems about the same as other carriers, but thought food and service better than most.
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 05:43 AM
  #12  
Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I used them last month and I thought it was the worst overseas airline that I have flown. There are three classes with British Air. Business-Economy-and steerage(Elvira-I also use your term)In steerage,it is absolutely miserable-I'm six feet tall.<BR>As mentioned earlier, you must fly thru London to get to the rest of Europe.<BR>If you think Atlanta or Northwest's Detroit terminals are bad, you ain't seen nothing yet. On our outbound flight, the walk to our next gate was more than a mile! We were then reqired to wait under a departure screen for about 30 minutes until they could decide our departure gate.<BR>Coming back,we had to take a bus from our arriving terminal to (Terminial 4 I believe) about a 3 mile ride. Once there, We were made to wait at an unmarked gate. After another 20 minutes, we were then herded back onto another bus and driven about another 2 miles unto the Tarmac. All this time, there was no one around to give us direction unless you asked.<BR>BA,IMHO has a I don't care attitude that goes along with their refusal to answer their telephone.<BR>
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 05:53 AM
  #13  
Genny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What Bill mentions about the chaos in the terminal-Heathrow for us-was unbelievable. And this was before 9/11. After we disembarked at Heathrow to catch our flight home, we had to walk a ways and then line up to what we though would be to get to the gate and the end of it. But after we lined up we were herded with tons of other passengers to one central escalator that was to go down to the buses to take us to the connecting flight terminal. But as there were so many people they had to limit the number going down the escalator. Finally after what seemed like an eternity we finally made it down the escalator and then had to board the buses. My family consisted of five people and so we had to make sure all of us were on the same bus so as to not be split up in all the commotion. <BR><BR>I don't know how I forgot about this part of our trip. Maybe because it was so horrendous I put it out of mind. <BR><BR><BR><BR>
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 06:01 AM
  #14  
Bill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Genny,<BR>We went thru this exact thing twice-Changing terminals and going to the Tarmac!
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 06:14 AM
  #15  
xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unfortunately, Heathrow is one of the busiest airports in the world... I've had nightmare transfers at Heathrow, Gatwick, CdG, JFK, O'Hare, LAX, DIA, San Diego. The fun part is never the airport/airline - unless you are upgraded to 1st ;-).
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 06:26 AM
  #16  
xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
They have a pompeous attitude...<BR><BR>I am flying with them this week. When I booked the ticket several weeks ago, I asked for an aisle seat. I was given one of those obscene middle seats between 2 strangers.<BR><BR>I called them and explained I had a medical condition which required me to have an aisle seat for easy access to the lavatory. Now I know that they don't pre-assign all the seats. There are seats left for check in. The piece of garbage explained she could not make an exception. The computer would not allow it. I asked for a supervisor who also gave me the same lie and babbled something about fairness to all pax. I told the witch that she as a supervisor had the code to unlock the seats.<BR><BR>All she said was they would put my request in the computer but that I would have to arrive at check in extra early to get what I need.<BR><BR>Is this anyway to run an airline?
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 07:11 AM
  #17  
Martha
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
xxx, This is the standard way that seat allocation is done in the UK. Can I suggest that if you HAVE to have a certain seat, that you pay the extra to travel 1st, or business class ... or do what they say, and turn up early, like the rest of us have the option to do.
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 07:14 AM
  #18  
Christina
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've seen charts that the BA seats are an inch wider on the 777s (18.25"), which is pretty good. Here is one chart on seat width<BR>http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cacheq-iHV7WUu0C:www.cheapflights.co.uk/misc/legroom_report.html+%22seat+pitch%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8<BR><BR>Here's a chart on seat pitch which doesn't designate by plane type:<BR><BR>http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cacheq-iHV7WUu0C:www.cheapflights.co.uk/misc/legroom_report.html+%22seat+pitch%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8<BR><BR>Here's a pretty good chart designating airlines by seat pitch (all of the sites I've seen imply BA designates the same seat pitch on various planes)<BR><BR>http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:QSxjJAxWl1MC:www.geocities.com/profemery/entertainment/legroom.html+%22seat+pitch%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8<BR><BR>I like their designation of 29" pitch as "circus midget chair" which is true. <BR>Here's another good chart on comparative seat size and features on BA's flights<BR>http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cachelt1PXnEM60C:www.travelleronline.co m/planner/airnews.shtml+%22british+airways%22+767+seat+pitch &hl=en&ie=UTF-8<BR><BR>and here's yet another where I found the comparison between their new 767s and others:<BR><BR>http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:i6G666Y-BXIC:www.extratall.co.uk/news_cramped_seats_can_kill.htm+%22british+airways %22+767+seat+pitch&hl=en&ie=UTF-8<BR><BR>Anyway, I mainly choose by price and times, but when it's a tossup, I do consider seat size as with those small spaces, I think an inch makes a big difference, myself. On the other hand, I don't care that much about service unless they really botch things up, because the seat comfort is what affects my flight the most. I don't really care at all about food, I don't look at flying as a dining experience.
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 07:26 AM
  #19  
John
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cheapflights.co.uk says BA's 747s use 17.25" (wide) x 31" (pitch - row spacing) seats, just about the max Boeing will stuff into that plane. It says their 777s use 18.25" seats, a big difference on a 6-10 hr. flight. (Their premium coach seats are 38" apart.) The BA website says they're reconfiguring all their long haul equipment for "more comfort" by the end of the summer. Wanna bet?
 
Old Aug 12th, 2002, 07:29 AM
  #20  
Kay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
xxx, that's pretty muchthe way seats are allocated in the US also.<BR><BR>Genny, Heathrow, and other British airports, have been dealing with the terrorist IRA for a long time before 9/11.
 


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -