Brexit
Dec 22nd, 2019, 01:16 AM
#21
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is exactly because of the ESTA that the EU is introducing the ETIAS.
Dec 22nd, 2019, 01:47 AM
#22
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's time to grow up from aping the USA. Europe has no need for that.
Dec 22nd, 2019, 03:35 AM
#23
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They aren't aping they are retaliating.
Dec 22nd, 2019, 05:02 AM
#24
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it would be a retaliation it would apply only for US citizens, but it's going to apply for Japanese, Israelis, Mexicans, etc...who are used to travel hassle free into Europe.
Dec 22nd, 2019, 05:23 AM
#25
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Canada, Australia and India also have similar travel authorization systems.
I assume that international travellers have become used to a myriad of pre-trip or on-arrival registration schemes that it won't really matter to anyone.
I assume that international travellers have become used to a myriad of pre-trip or on-arrival registration schemes that it won't really matter to anyone.
Dec 26th, 2019, 04:14 AM
#26
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leaving the EU will have zero impact on non EU visitors so that's all non EU visitors need to concern themselves with. After all, I don't visit the US with Trump's tariff war with China on my mind, why would I?
Dec 26th, 2019, 08:12 AM
#27
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The forecast for economic growth? Which ones are you talking about? The only positive one I have seen was from an obscure think tank and had such a long time frame as to be useless.
Dec 26th, 2019, 08:31 PM
#28
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the negative ones don't?
I could point out to not confuse the macro with the micro.
I could suggest you look at what is considered "negative". There is an Oxford paper which claims Brexit negatives of less "competition" in the workforce. Leading to more worker rights and higher wages. Have we really gotten to the point that Victorian workhouses are considered a positive? Why not just bring back the lash?
Reality is the EU is based on ever widening inequality. Stripping away worker rights in every way.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-g...grant-workers/
That's the stuff that is considered a Brexit negative.
Dec 26th, 2019, 08:54 PM
#29
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the negative ones don't?
I could point out to not confuse the macro with the micro.
I could suggest you look at what is considered "negative". There is an Oxford paper which claims Brexit negatives of less "competition" in the workforce. Leading to more worker rights and higher wages. Have we really gotten to the point that Victorian workhouses are considered a positive? Why not just bring back the lash?
Reality is the EU is based on ever widening inequality. Stripping away worker rights in every way.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-g...grant-workers/
That's the stuff that is considered a Brexit negative.
I could point out to not confuse the macro with the micro.
I could suggest you look at what is considered "negative". There is an Oxford paper which claims Brexit negatives of less "competition" in the workforce. Leading to more worker rights and higher wages. Have we really gotten to the point that Victorian workhouses are considered a positive? Why not just bring back the lash?
Reality is the EU is based on ever widening inequality. Stripping away worker rights in every way.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-g...grant-workers/
That's the stuff that is considered a Brexit negative.
Dec 27th, 2019, 03:00 AM
#30
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What nonsense. There is not a country on the globe that has stronger worker rights than does France and France is not leaving the EU.
