Brexit
#21

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 19,644
Likes: 0
It is exactly because of the ESTA that the EU is introducing the ETIAS.
#22
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
It's time to grow up from aping the USA. Europe has no need for that.
#24
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
If it would be a retaliation it would apply only for US citizens, but it's going to apply for Japanese, Israelis, Mexicans, etc...who are used to travel hassle free into Europe.
#25
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,247
Likes: 0
Canada, Australia and India also have similar travel authorization systems.
I assume that international travellers have become used to a myriad of pre-trip or on-arrival registration schemes that it won't really matter to anyone.
I assume that international travellers have become used to a myriad of pre-trip or on-arrival registration schemes that it won't really matter to anyone.
#26
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Leaving the EU will have zero impact on non EU visitors so that's all non EU visitors need to concern themselves with. After all, I don't visit the US with Trump's tariff war with China on my mind, why would I?
#27
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
The forecast for economic growth? Which ones are you talking about? The only positive one I have seen was from an obscure think tank and had such a long time frame as to be useless.
#28

Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
And the negative ones don't?
I could point out to not confuse the macro with the micro.
I could suggest you look at what is considered "negative". There is an Oxford paper which claims Brexit negatives of less "competition" in the workforce. Leading to more worker rights and higher wages. Have we really gotten to the point that Victorian workhouses are considered a positive? Why not just bring back the lash?
Reality is the EU is based on ever widening inequality. Stripping away worker rights in every way.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-g...grant-workers/
That's the stuff that is considered a Brexit negative.
#29

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
And the negative ones don't?
I could point out to not confuse the macro with the micro.
I could suggest you look at what is considered "negative". There is an Oxford paper which claims Brexit negatives of less "competition" in the workforce. Leading to more worker rights and higher wages. Have we really gotten to the point that Victorian workhouses are considered a positive? Why not just bring back the lash?
Reality is the EU is based on ever widening inequality. Stripping away worker rights in every way.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-g...grant-workers/
That's the stuff that is considered a Brexit negative.
I could point out to not confuse the macro with the micro.
I could suggest you look at what is considered "negative". There is an Oxford paper which claims Brexit negatives of less "competition" in the workforce. Leading to more worker rights and higher wages. Have we really gotten to the point that Victorian workhouses are considered a positive? Why not just bring back the lash?
Reality is the EU is based on ever widening inequality. Stripping away worker rights in every way.
https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-g...grant-workers/
That's the stuff that is considered a Brexit negative.
#30
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
What nonsense. There is not a country on the globe that has stronger worker rights than does France and France is not leaving the EU.




