Just returned from Antarctica!
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Just returned from Antarctica!
Still a work in progress, but if anyone is interested, here are my photos:
http://tinyurl.com/ycvbx3v
and "blog":
http://tinyurl.com/ykra9rr
Thanks
http://tinyurl.com/ycvbx3v
and "blog":
http://tinyurl.com/ykra9rr
Thanks
#5


Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 22,041
Likes: 0
Read your blog again and looked at all your pictures again.
Great stuff.
I would love to goto Antartica also.
There are some places in the world you just want to go to .... and itis difficult to explain to others . why!
I am glad it was summer there !!!
Great stuff.
I would love to goto Antartica also.
There are some places in the world you just want to go to .... and itis difficult to explain to others . why!
I am glad it was summer there !!!
Trending Topics
#9
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Chris, after much debate right up to the last minute, I ended up leaving the 100-400 home. Mainly for weight reasons. So I took my 70-200 f/4 (old version, non IS) and a 1.4x extender.
I had the extender on during my first zodiac ride, and wouldn't you know it, we encountered some really close wildlife, too close, and I missed my shots. So the extender stayed in the cabin after that.
I found the 70-200 worked well for me for the rest of the trip. Oh, and the 17-40 too!
I had the extender on during my first zodiac ride, and wouldn't you know it, we encountered some really close wildlife, too close, and I missed my shots. So the extender stayed in the cabin after that.
I found the 70-200 worked well for me for the rest of the trip. Oh, and the 17-40 too!
#10
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Thanks for the response. It is always hard to figure out lenses for a trip like that, because you can encounter such a huge variety of subject distances. We are going to the Galapagos next May and it seems like exactly the same kind of situation. But in my case, I have my wife taking pictures too, so we can "divide and conquer." In Antarctica, I used the 100-400 and she used the 24-105 on shore landings, and that worked out really well. Not sure what we will do in the Galapagos but I am tempted to give her the 100-400 and use the 500/4.
Anyway, congratulations again on your excellent pictures, and thanks for sharing them.
Chris
Anyway, congratulations again on your excellent pictures, and thanks for sharing them.
Chris
#14
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Thanks gshah!
Charli: I too went in January. I didn't take note of the temperature, but it wasn't as cold as one would imagine. Then again I packed really well. The coldest and windiest situations were in the zodiac, and outside while on the ship - sometimes it was too brutal to take for more than a minute. On land it was a lot calmer. When the sun was shining I even took off my outer jacket once or twice!
Charli: I too went in January. I didn't take note of the temperature, but it wasn't as cold as one would imagine. Then again I packed really well. The coldest and windiest situations were in the zodiac, and outside while on the ship - sometimes it was too brutal to take for more than a minute. On land it was a lot calmer. When the sun was shining I even took off my outer jacket once or twice!
#17
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
Heading South on Nov 26th .. Wondered what filters besides maybe a polarizer that you used for your shots. Taking 55-250 and 18-55 lens, Canon Rebel and a point and shoot.
Would you recommend tri-pod? I guess the extender should stay at home.
Also with type of thermals did you bring for the trip. Still debating choices. Seems like cotton is out. Appreciate feedback
Would you recommend tri-pod? I guess the extender should stay at home.
Also with type of thermals did you bring for the trip. Still debating choices. Seems like cotton is out. Appreciate feedback
#18
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
I didn't find any filters other than a polarizer useful.
I used a monopod instead of a tripod; especially with my 100-400 lens. If your extender works with your 55-250, I'd definitely take it ... though I didn't use my 100-400 nearly as much as my 17-200, there were times I was glad for the added reach of my long lens.
Have you looked into smartwool long johns. Soft; not at all scratchy ... my husband and I both swear by them now.
Have fun and come back and share your photos and your impressions.
I used a monopod instead of a tripod; especially with my 100-400 lens. If your extender works with your 55-250, I'd definitely take it ... though I didn't use my 100-400 nearly as much as my 17-200, there were times I was glad for the added reach of my long lens.
Have you looked into smartwool long johns. Soft; not at all scratchy ... my husband and I both swear by them now.
Have fun and come back and share your photos and your impressions.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thit_cho
Africa & the Middle East
7
Feb 27th, 2008 05:49 AM





