First visit to New Zealand and (possibly) Australia
Jun 18th, 2013, 11:25 AM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First visit to New Zealand and (possibly) Australia
Hi -
My wife and I are at the preliminary planning stages of a trip to New Zealand. Depending on time we may visit Australia also, but New Zealand is the priority. We will be traveling from New York and are thinking of a stop over for a night in each direction in Los Angeles just to break up the flying a little.
Our initial thoughts were to go either in October or April. So the first question is, assuming we visit during a shoulder season, what time period would likely provide the best weather?
The second question may be more difficult. How much time would we need to have a reasonably relaxed vacation to see the highlights, do some hiking, etc.? I realize we could spend months and more time is always preferred, but is two weeks reasonable? If we wanted to add Australia, would we need an additional couple of weeks or would 3 weeks total be OK? And if we had only 3 weeks, would we be better off spending it all in New Zealand rather than trying to squeeze a little time in in Australia also? Because we will be traveling such a long distance, It would be a shame not to see both areas, but depending on the amount of time I have available, I would rather have a nice vacation than try to see everything and wind up feeling rushed and needing a vacation from my vacation
.
My wife and I are at the preliminary planning stages of a trip to New Zealand. Depending on time we may visit Australia also, but New Zealand is the priority. We will be traveling from New York and are thinking of a stop over for a night in each direction in Los Angeles just to break up the flying a little.
Our initial thoughts were to go either in October or April. So the first question is, assuming we visit during a shoulder season, what time period would likely provide the best weather?
The second question may be more difficult. How much time would we need to have a reasonably relaxed vacation to see the highlights, do some hiking, etc.? I realize we could spend months and more time is always preferred, but is two weeks reasonable? If we wanted to add Australia, would we need an additional couple of weeks or would 3 weeks total be OK? And if we had only 3 weeks, would we be better off spending it all in New Zealand rather than trying to squeeze a little time in in Australia also? Because we will be traveling such a long distance, It would be a shame not to see both areas, but depending on the amount of time I have available, I would rather have a nice vacation than try to see everything and wind up feeling rushed and needing a vacation from my vacation
.
Jun 18th, 2013, 12:27 PM
#2
trips, I'm just planning our 17 day trip to NZ and it's not long enough.
my advice - with 3 weeks just stick to NZ. you will have loads to see and will probably have difficulty getting all you want to see into one trip.
my advice - with 3 weeks just stick to NZ. you will have loads to see and will probably have difficulty getting all you want to see into one trip.
Jun 18th, 2013, 04:04 PM
#4
Ditto three weeks one country, and even then you'll have trouble narrowing things down, believe me.
I find that stopovers are actually more tiring than flying straight through, unless there's a transit hotel IN the airport in question, and there isn't in LAX. By stopping over, you have to collect your luggage, and then get back to the airport and deal with security all over again the following day. I don't find that particularly restful and it eats up a day of vacation time.
In two weeks you can see the highlights of one island of NZ (unless you're a fast paced traveler and don't mind lots of driving). With three weeks you could see the highlights of both, or see a lot of one.
October and April are good months for NZ, although the weather can be unpredictable year round. I suggest you avoid school holidays and Easter.
http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistr...msAndHols.aspx
I find that stopovers are actually more tiring than flying straight through, unless there's a transit hotel IN the airport in question, and there isn't in LAX. By stopping over, you have to collect your luggage, and then get back to the airport and deal with security all over again the following day. I don't find that particularly restful and it eats up a day of vacation time.
In two weeks you can see the highlights of one island of NZ (unless you're a fast paced traveler and don't mind lots of driving). With three weeks you could see the highlights of both, or see a lot of one.
October and April are good months for NZ, although the weather can be unpredictable year round. I suggest you avoid school holidays and Easter.
http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistr...msAndHols.aspx
Jun 18th, 2013, 05:26 PM
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks for the replies.
It looks like we are likely to try to go toward the end of March into the beginning of April, which seems to be a good time of year and will avoid Easter. October will be here faster than we expect and we haven't even made plans for a vacation this summer yet. I would love to take 4 weeks, but I think I may have to settle for 3.
Melnq8, I'll give some thought to what you said about stopping in LAX for the night vs. flying straight through. I agree, it's a bit of a pain. I'm just not sure about being on a plane for that long -- although there would probably have to be a change of planes at some point that would provide a chance to stretch a little in any event.
Now I'm going to spend some time looking at others itineraries and threads. More questions to come, I'm sure!
It looks like we are likely to try to go toward the end of March into the beginning of April, which seems to be a good time of year and will avoid Easter. October will be here faster than we expect and we haven't even made plans for a vacation this summer yet
. I would love to take 4 weeks, but I think I may have to settle for 3.Melnq8, I'll give some thought to what you said about stopping in LAX for the night vs. flying straight through. I agree, it's a bit of a pain. I'm just not sure about being on a plane for that long -- although there would probably have to be a change of planes at some point that would provide a chance to stretch a little in any event.
Now I'm going to spend some time looking at others itineraries and threads. More questions to come, I'm sure!
Jun 18th, 2013, 06:32 PM
#6
I agree about stopovers Mel. Unless it's a destination I want to visit & I can take a couple of days, or a Transit Hotel within the airport, I never bother.
Frankly, the pfaffing about going through Customs twice for 24 hours or less is a lot more irritating to me than just flying straight through. You're not padlocked into your seat & a wander around, chat with the crew & a stretch now & again can make even cattle class quite bearable.
Besides, you'll be buoyed by the excitement & anticipation on the outbound leg & chattering about your wonderful adventures on the homeward.
Frankly, the pfaffing about going through Customs twice for 24 hours or less is a lot more irritating to me than just flying straight through. You're not padlocked into your seat & a wander around, chat with the crew & a stretch now & again can make even cattle class quite bearable.
Besides, you'll be buoyed by the excitement & anticipation on the outbound leg & chattering about your wonderful adventures on the homeward.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kktravelbugs
Australia & the Pacific
15
Sep 27th, 2012 11:35 PM
Barbara_Mckeon
Australia & the Pacific
10
Aug 14th, 2012 06:50 PM
Alice9
Australia & the Pacific
6
Sep 21st, 2007 09:19 AM
