Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Asia
Reload this Page > Chiang Mai vs. Chiang Rai and Golden Triangle

Chiang Mai vs. Chiang Rai and Golden Triangle


Dec 6th, 2006, 11:29 AM
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Chiang Mai vs. Chiang Rai and Golden Triangle


Which do you recommend to go?
1. Chiang Mai and the surrounding area.
2. Chiang Rai and Golden Triangle?

I have been in both places -- Chiang Mai (YCV and other hotels), Golden Triangle (Anantara), and prefer Chiang Mai.

Chiang Rai and Golden Triangle -- not much to do and see besides enjoying to stay at luxury hotels. For me, two days are enough.

Chiang Mai and surrounding area -- a lot of activities, choices of restaurants, and sights to see. Chiang Mai is the center of Northern Thailand culture (Lana) which we do not see much in Chiang Rai and Golden Triangle area. There are many many tuk tuks available to go anywhere in the city so that transportation is not inconvenient at all. Sunday Market in the old town has incredible atmosphere with music and scenery. I love to go there before it is crowded.

Of course, Chiang Mai is a touristy place, but there are reasons why it is so popular.
wlee88 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Dec 6th, 2006, 11:35 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,612
My preference is for the Golden Triangle area. I found plenty to do there.

CM is a huge city, so, true it has more restaurants and such, but if I want city, I much prefer Bangkok.
Kathie is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 PM.