Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Asia
Reload this Page >

7 nights--Tokyo/Kyoto--is Hiroshima a must?

7 nights--Tokyo/Kyoto--is Hiroshima a must?

Old Dec 29th, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
7 nights--Tokyo/Kyoto--is Hiroshima a must?

My husband and I will be in Japan for 7 nights in April. We plan to divide our time among Tokyo and Kyoto but are also considering Nara, Hiroshima and Miya Jima. I'd appreciate your input regarding that proposed itinerary. I don't want to pack too much in a short amount of time but don't want to miss out on anything vital either. Thank you for your time.
chicagoahc is offline  
Old Dec 29th, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #2  
kja
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 25,757
Likes: 0
Hi, chicagoahc -

Hiroshima is very moving, but with only 7 days, I'm not sure it makes sense for you to try to go there. If you do decide to go, it is easily paired with Miyajima.

Nara is easy to reach from Kyoto and has some wonderful sites, but whether it is worth it to you to spend a day there depends on your priorities for the many magnificent things to see in Kyoto and Nara.

Hope that helps!
kja is offline  
Old Dec 29th, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
with only 7 nights, u might even forego tokyo since kyoto is sooo wonderful
there's a lovely castle west of kyoto worth a 1/2 day visit too
lilipad is offline  
Old Dec 29th, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #4  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
1m Airline Miles
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,412
Likes: 0
with 7 nights you have fewer options.

Are you flying into NRT and out of KIX? Doing that would give you one more night in a city.

I would do 4 nights Tokyo and 3 nights in Kyoto then fly home from KIX.

Tokyo is a much larger city with lots to see spread out over a large area. The first day you will be recovering from jetlag and will probably not do much but adjust and adjust to the being in Asia.

Kyoto is a much smaller city with lots of interesting attractions but they are all much closer together. By the time you hit Kyoto you will be better in tune to the Japanese culture and can hit the city in stride.

I know others will advise more time in Kyoto but that's just my opinion. Either way, have fun!

Aloha!
hawaiiantraveler is online now  
Old Dec 29th, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
<< I would do 4 nights Tokyo and 3 nights in Kyoto then fly home from KIX.>>
Ditto on this advice, except as HT predicted, I'm one of those who'd make it 3 nights in Tokyo and 4 in Kyoto. It depends on what kind of "Japanese culture" you prefer. Four days in Kyoto would also allow a day trip to Nara or Hiroshima/Himeji if you really wanted it.
WillJame is offline  
Old Dec 30th, 2008 | 01:16 AM
  #6  
Community Builder
40 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
1m Airline Miles
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,801
Likes: 0
Miyajima is certainly not an absolute must visit.

Assuming you are fling in/out of Tokyo then you would have a 7-day JR Pass. In that case a trip to Hiroshima would not cost any more. It is possible to visit Hiroshima as a day trip from Kyoto. But that is leaning towards packing in too much. So, no, Hiroshima is not necessary.

Do visit Nara.
mrwunrfl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jenniferhaywardtx
Asia
9
Jun 25th, 2008 07:19 PM
scheldekaai
Asia
6
May 21st, 2008 02:56 PM
veromar
Asia
11
Nov 20th, 2007 06:57 PM
alibi13
Asia
9
Aug 18th, 2005 12:29 PM
ginnyp
Asia
4
Aug 13th, 2004 02:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -