Does AA still have extra room in coach?
Jul 3rd, 2006, 06:38 AM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does AA still have extra room in coach?
It's been a few years since I was on AA but I remember a few years back that AA was boasting the "most leg room in coach". I am traveling from DCA to PDX with a connection through ORD. On three legs of the flight the equipment is MD80 (Super) and one leg is ERJ. When I called the 800# to inquire if they still have extra leg room they said yes.
Is that true? Have anyone else traveled that route and found that there is indeed extra leg room in coach?
Is that true? Have anyone else traveled that route and found that there is indeed extra leg room in coach?
Jul 3rd, 2006, 08:07 AM
#2
<i>When I called the 800# to inquire if they still have extra leg room they said yes.</i>
I truly wish you had obtained the name of the CSR that said that on the phone.
"MRTC" - More Room Throughout Coach - is long gone. AA has the same seat pitch as everyone else now, worse than some actually.
The only US carrier offering extra legroom in coach nowadays is United, provided you qualify for (through elite FF status) or have purchased the right to sit in their "economy plus" seating section on many - but not all - aircraft.
I would definitely try to avoid the RJ sector (I presume DCA-ORD or v.v.)
I truly wish you had obtained the name of the CSR that said that on the phone.
"MRTC" - More Room Throughout Coach - is long gone. AA has the same seat pitch as everyone else now, worse than some actually.
The only US carrier offering extra legroom in coach nowadays is United, provided you qualify for (through elite FF status) or have purchased the right to sit in their "economy plus" seating section on many - but not all - aircraft.
I would definitely try to avoid the RJ sector (I presume DCA-ORD or v.v.)
Jul 3rd, 2006, 02:45 PM
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks so much for the info, when the CSR told me that they did have more leg room, I thought that this was wrong information. Sometimes, I think the CSR's are generally mis-informed or they just tell you anything to get you off the phone.
Jul 4th, 2006, 03:56 AM
#8
Gardyloo, you are correct that E+ seating is on most but not all UA flights. I'll be a bit nitpicky and suggest that "most, but not quite all" UA flights have E+ seating and E+ is availaible on Ted and on United Express flights (where it is call ExPlus).
Jul 4th, 2006, 03:34 PM
#11
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure what percentage of the United Express fleet has explus (first class plus E+). There's a press release from last year that says 1/3 of the UX fleet by the end of 2005 and another from earlier this year that says that says there is explus service to 70 markets. All of the CR-700s I've been on recently have had it, including the one we flew from Jacksonville to Chicago just a few hours ago. Mr. Easy Chicken Online offered me the chance to upgrade to first class for $130, but I declined.
May 4th, 2007, 03:20 PM
#13
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More leg room in coach went the way of most airline service.
Americans talk a good game, but we VOTE with out pocketbooks. AA wanted to charge more since they had fewer seats... we wanted to pay less. They adapted to meet our wants.
Americans talk a good game, but we VOTE with out pocketbooks. AA wanted to charge more since they had fewer seats... we wanted to pay less. They adapted to meet our wants.
May 5th, 2007, 12:59 PM
#14
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not exactly how it happened. AA wasn't charging perceptibly more on "More Room in Coach" flights. They just re-discovered that they could get more income from more passengers; and with the reduction in numbers of flights (esp. since 9/11) overall, they could get away with taking out the extra room, because on a great many routes, their passengers really don't have a huge choice among carriers. Sure wish I could vote against AA with my feet, but that would mean walking to many of my destinations.
May 5th, 2007, 03:41 PM
#15
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Folks,
Go back to www.seatguru.com and check out the pitch for the various airlines, this will tell you if there's more or less leg room.
Go back to www.seatguru.com and check out the pitch for the various airlines, this will tell you if there's more or less leg room.
May 5th, 2007, 05:18 PM
#16
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AA said they couldn't afford to give the more room through coach. I read an interview with an AA excecutive. Basically they had "hoped" that this would allow them to raise prices when that didn't happen they had to look at revenue per flight. Fewer seats equals less revenue so.....
May 5th, 2007, 07:25 PM
#17
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to agree with Carol on this one. They're going to have to put more seats back to stay competitive. They couldn't have fewer seats compared to other airlines & charge the same as the other airline does especially with fuller flights.
May 6th, 2007, 11:52 AM
#20
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AA didn't charge more, but once the loads were getting back to "normal", ~2005/06, AA could not sustain their business plan. If they were to match all the other legacy airlines in fares, they needed more seats to fill. Let's not forget that 4 of the 6 legacy airlines were under bankrupcy protection, shedding their retirement plans and not paying many bills. AA kept on paying into the retirement plan, kept on paying bills and it's the only US based legacy airline that has never been in the bankrupcy court.
