Zoom lens question...

Reply

Jul 6th, 2005, 01:42 PM
  #61
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Kavey
I would love to see your photographs. Do you have them posted somewhere. I am going to Bateleur Camp, Masai Mara this month, looking for good ideas.
Thank You
John Dunne
kylebrook is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 02:17 PM
  #62
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,153
I think I said somewhere before but I don't recall which thread, a second hand 10D or a new 350D would be fine as a BACKUP for your 20D. These cameras will both produce good images. Heck, a good photographer can get good images from much, much less expensive equipment.

I've said on many threads that I really do NOT think L glass is a good investment for a learner or indeed anyone who's photography is not already pretty darn good - the difference for a good photographer is noticable but for the rest of us it's not the main thing that will improve our photographs. I don't have L glass myself yet though I think I'm improving so I may get a single L glass lens when I next purchase a new lens if I have the budget. Then again I may not.

Cooncat, I do think you have what it takes to get better images from your equipment - that is the will to learn and the patience to research and spend your budget most wisely.

Kylebrook
Photos from my 2004 Southern Africa trip, taken on a Nikon D70 digital with the kit lens wider zoom and a CHEAP Nikon telephoto zoom are here:

http://www.kaveyland.com/FavellesTra...2004/index.htm

Photos from my brief April 2004 trip to Kenya were taken on my Minolta film SLR using regular Fuji Superia print film and inexpensive equipment/ lenses and are here:

www.kavey.dpcprints.com (the ones with DSWF in the title)

Kind Regards
Kavey
Kavey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 02:19 PM
  #63
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,153
PS the Canon 350D (what is called the Rebel XT in the States) feels too small to me too. Friends that have it LOVE it, photographer hobbiests included but it HAS to feel comfortable to hold and use so if you find it too small, as I do... don't buy it!
Kavey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 04:38 PM
  #64
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,297
Kavey -- Funny that you mention it being too small -- I have never found any camera too small, let alone the Rebel, only too large -- now I'm thinking maybe this means I'm carrying mine around too much instead of holding it & using it!

Then again my hands are small...I always look enviously at people holding a tiny Canon Elph, etc... and think how much spare room they must have in their packs for souvenirs!
lisa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 06:24 PM
  #65
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,553
Lawrence,

Thanks for the feedback.

Man, that lens lust is very hard to resist. My current lenses slap me every time they see me looking lustily at another lens, but it does little good!

Now, if I may disclose the entire reason why I have gone the DSLR route...it was while I was at Kulefu in Lower Zambezi last year. There was this Scandinavian guest there and his lens was just so...well, BIG. Yes, his camera was very well hung!

Imagine my embarrassment as I sat there for about three days with him in the same vehicle with my little Sony F707 while he was sporting a massive 400mm lens on his body. Oh, the shame!

It was then that I decided that I would not be put to shame by anybody else's large focal unit next time around!

Anyway, only because I have so much other stuff to still get before my safari (really good ball mount to support my big lens), laptop, a couple more Gigs of memory, a couple more batteries, a couple more filters (one for sunsets and possibly a neutral density), a backup Canon 20d body and especially a good Tamrac photo backpack.

The 120-300mm f/2.8 lens will be on top of my wish list, but for now it will have to wait.
Roccco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 07:57 PM
  #66
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 814
Roccco, Re lens lust:
Hanging around a fire after sundowners with friends, all conservationists, mostly women, we were musing over how men who are hunters think they are so macho...but we think they are overcompensating. If you know what I mean. In a word, big gun, little....

Now we did not talk about lenses, but before anyone gets too lustful...

By the way, we definitely concluded that if the photographer is a woman, then a lense really is just a lense.
tashak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 08:31 PM
  #67
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 58
That's a really funny story Rocco. I am just the opposite. I love my super small XT (350D) with a little 50mm prime on it. Its about the same sime as your old 707 but it takes fantastic portraits. The best part is it only costs $70.

I uploaded some photos I took in the last month or so with it, mostly at two friend's weddings.
http://individual.utoronto.ca/ltaylor/web/
sunny_days is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 6th, 2005, 11:05 PM
  #68
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,553
Tasha,

While that may hold true for hunters, I have never lied about the zoom of my lens!
Roccco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 12:22 AM
  #69
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2
Thank you Kavey
Stunning pics
kylebrook is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 02:04 AM
  #70
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,153
Thanks!

Lisa, I don't find the Rebel too small (the 300d) just the new Rebel XT (350D) which is much smaller than any other SLR I've ever held.

Friends with smaller hands really like it and if it weren't for the comfort in holding it I'd probably be happy with it too.
Kavey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 05:11 AM
  #71
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 859
Kavey - Thanks for the vote of confidence! I do remember your advice about the 10D for a backup- I was responding to, I think Tashak? Or someone who suggested that I save money on the body and buy a better lens.

Sunny Days - Very nice pictures!

Rocco - you are too funny. I hope your arms are as big as your... ahem....lenses, because you've got yourself quite an arsenal to carry around! ;-)
cooncat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 05:38 AM
  #72
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,153
Cooncat, I really like cameras with a body and hand grip shape that allows me to easily swing it up one handed straight to my eye, composing FAST and pressing that shutter button in one fluid motion if necessary.

The 350D is just too small for me to do that.

Also, my husband, 6 foot 6 inches tall and with hands and feet to match, finds it almost toy like to hold and given that he'd be using it a lot too... it's a definite no-no for us.

But it looks like a great camera for the price.
Kavey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 05:58 AM
  #73
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,553
Kavey (you braggart)

And just what does the size of your hubby's feet have to do with holding a camera?
Roccco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 06:11 AM
  #74
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,153
It's his HANDS that hold the camera - but as with most tall people, he has large hands AND feet. I think the phrase "hands and feet" just came to mind automatically in one lump phrase when explaining why his hands are so big - because he's so tall!


Kavey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Jul 7th, 2005, 06:35 AM
  #75
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 859
Kavey - I'm with you. It's easier for me to hold steady a larger, heavier camera. And it's not like the 20D weighs 10 pounds! Or kilos!;-)
cooncat is offline  
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 PM.