Which would you do?

Reply

Jul 31st, 2001, 06:00 PM
  #1
Diaz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Which would you do?

Hi!My wife and I are in the planning stages of planning a year off to travel the world. We innitially talked about going to countries off the beaten path or countries we would not typical go to but want to see. Our thinking was that in our lifetime, we would probably see London, Paris or some of the more common tourist/traveler destinations at one time or another. Now I sort of have thought about the flip side of this. If we are going to spend all this money for a once in a life time experience, wouldn't we rather go to the places we want to, even if some of these destinations are the Londons and Parises. Which would you do?
 
Reply With Quote
Jul 31st, 2001, 11:14 PM
  #2
April
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd want to do both.
 
Reply With Quote
Jul 31st, 2001, 11:22 PM
  #3
Karen Michaelson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why Paris & london? What are you going to experience there? and Why not one of the best wildlife country in Africa? e.g: Tanzania - Ngorongoro Crater, Serengeti, The whitesands of Zanzibar. You have to do something which will linger with your memories forever. AFRICA THE BEST CHOICE- UNSPOILEC AREA AND NO POLLUTION.

Karen
 
Reply With Quote
Aug 1st, 2001, 02:52 AM
  #4
gail
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Go where YOU want. Forget about what you SHOULD see in the world. When we went to Egypt this spring everyone told us we were crazy since we hadn't yet done the Paris's, London's, etc. of the world. There is no right place to go - anytime you go one place, you don't go to another. There is always next time and planning it/dreaming about it is half the fun.
 
Reply With Quote
Aug 1st, 2001, 06:27 AM
  #5
something
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
From the Europe Forum, with 17 responses:
Author: Diaz ([email protected])
Date: 7/11/2001, 3:49 pm ET

Message: Hi! My wife and I are in the planning stages of planning a year off to travel the world. We innitially talked about going to countries off the beaten path or countries we would not typical go to but want to see. Our thinking was that in our lifetime, we would probably see London, Paris or some of the more common tourist/traveler destinations at one time or another. Now I sort of have thought about the flip side of this. If we are going to spend all this money for a once in a life time experience, wouldn't we rather go to the places we want to, even if some of these destinations are the Londons and Parises. Which would you do?

Diaz, how many opinions do you need? Or are you collecting information for a book or magazine article?
 
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 PM.