Search

Hotels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26th, 2000 | 05:17 AM
  #1  
Kathy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hotels

Which hotel would you recommend over the other and why? The Midland or Palmer House Hilton? Thanks.
Kathy
 
Old May 26th, 2000 | 05:24 AM
  #2  
KN1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What city?
 
Old May 26th, 2000 | 06:23 AM
  #3  
KAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Kathy, I assume it's Chicago. I've attended meetings at the Midland and it was nice. I stayed at the Palmer House and it's absolutely gorgeous. I'd stay there again in a heartbeat.

Slightly better location. Closer to the museums, Grant Park, Mag-mile, but you may want to take a taxi if it's late.
Kal
 
Old May 26th, 2000 | 06:56 AM
  #4  
howard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's no contest--definitely the Palmer House Hilton.
 
Old May 26th, 2000 | 07:23 AM
  #5  
Kathy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am so sorry - of course these hotels are in Chicago! My error. I have a class at 230 W. Monroe. I know The Midland is closer but since you guys seem to choose Palmer House, I assume I can walk to the site or grab a cab. Thanks!
Kathy
 
Old Jun 23rd, 2000 | 09:21 AM
  #6  
Deena
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've stayed at both hotels and my vote goes for the Palmer House. The Midland is in the process of being refurbished and the newer rooms are nice but it is deeper in the loop than the Palmer. The Palmer is closer to the attractions, the lobby is exquisite, and the rooms are nice. I found the staff at the Midland to be a bit 'unfriendly'.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -