Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Some help regarding a Digital Camera

Search

Some help regarding a Digital Camera

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Some help regarding a Digital Camera

Hi Everyone, This forum gets a lot of responses so I'm calling on your wonderful knowledge and experience . . .

I have just ventured into the world of digital photography and purchased myself a very nice camera, but having been a manual SLR user for many years I'm finding the whole thing daunting.

My questions are the following: -
What size memory stick(s) do you travel with? It has a 32mb memory that came with it but this only holds about 26 standard photos, now I snapped away last weekend but only ended up saving about 6 photos which I downloaded onto my computer but I know I'd be saving many, many more when travelling.

How do you save your photos when you are away? Assuming I use all my memory sticks where do I download my photos to? I know that many sites such as yahoo groups etc have areas that you can download photos to but is this easy enough to do while on holiday (assuming I don't want to travel with my laptop and will be using internet cafes).

Once you've downloaded your photos to computer (hard-drive or internet site) do you burn a copy to CD-Rom or do you print out wanted photos on a printer? My old laptop doesn't have a burner in it and I'm a bit loathe to fork out another few hundred for an external burner?

I'm assuming that down the track the fact that I will no longer have to purchase film or actually pay for developing (except for those photos I really want), that the camera will pay for itself but at the moment it's all becoming quite expensive now that I'm confronted with the prospect of having to buy a burner, more memory, a printer etc.

Apart from that loving the experience of digital.

Thanks everyone in advance.
My cameral is a 5 mega-pixel, 3 x optical zoom but I am using it at the 3 mega-pixel and standard rather than fine setting which I am finding quite acceptable (and uses less battery/memory). What about you guys - do you find that this is ok or should I be using the higher (ie. 5 mpx and fine settings)?
Daneille is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Unless you are bringing along your own laptop with CD burner, I wouldn't rely on having easy access to computer resources abroad to download and burn CDs.

Camera memory cards are relatively inexpensive. I recently traveled with 512 MB of camera memory (450 pictures).

I find that taking pictures at 3MP are great for computer based photo albums and prints up to 5x7. I would only use the 5 MP setting if you intend to print 8X10 or larger.

What you will need is a reliable battery charger with dual voltage input (for european voltages) and converter plugs. There are several threads on this site dealing with this issue.

I hope that this helps. Remember that while your trip will end quickly, your pictures will last forever.
DonnieD is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,112
Likes: 0
What is the end use of your photos? This is critical info for advising you on whether you should be shooting at a higher format. (Professionals shoot in raw format for the maximum amount of data capture.)

My Olympus 8080 came with a 32mb xD card, but I use a 1 gig compact flash card which will hold more photos than I am ever likely to take at one time.

The size of memory you will need is directly related to how high a format you are shooting at, since the higher the format, the more room each photo will require.

All major cities will have photo labs that can burn a CD of your photos for a small fee. (Although, from a cost savings standpoint, it's as much as getting a roll of film developed.) Theoretically you can then erase your memory stick and reuse it. However, if you have any problem with the CD when you get home, you will be out of luck. It's largely a matter of how paranoid (or careful) you want to be.

My own plan is to have my tiny notebook computer with me, so I can upload the photos from my camera, view and store them on the computer, and also burn a safety CD (CD burner is built in).

I'm not sure what the usual policy is at internet cafes about uploading your photos to a website where you could store them. But within the next few years, as more and more people go digital, I'm sure we will see all sorts of options for solving these problems.
Marilyn is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
We no longer print all the photos we take on holiday - gets expensive and takes up room.
We just got a program called ProShow Gold (there are other similar ones) which we'll now use to make DVDs of our trips. We get music from the place we've visited and set the photos to that; the program is really easy to use and it puts movement on the pictures, titles, dissolves between them, etc...whatever you want. Then we can watch them (and listen) on the TV - much easier when looking at them with groups of friends or family.

The other day I was kind of down, the weather was nasty and I was lonely because my DH was out of town. I put on the DVD of our holiday in Greece and was instantly transported back - the sun, the views, the music... so wonderful.
taggie is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 0
I use this when I travel, it's a portable burner:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2004_...eno_cp200.html

You only need to travel with 1 memory stick (say 256 MB or 512) and blank cds and a converter. No need for a laptop.

Every day I would just come back and burn my pics, and empty out the card for the next day.

AP6380 is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0


I have just ventured into the world of digital photography and purchased myself a very nice camera, but having been a manual SLR user for many years I'm finding the whole thing daunting.


Use the search function and you will find a ton of information is already here.

My questions are the following: -
What size memory stick(s) do you travel with? It has a 32mb memory that came with it but this only holds about 26 standard photos, now I snapped away last weekend but only ended up saving about 6 photos which I downloaded onto my computer but I know I'd be saving many, many more when travelling.

How do you save your photos when you are away? Assuming I use all my memory sticks where do I download my photos to? I know that many sites such as yahoo groups etc have areas that you can download photos to but is this easy enough to do while on holiday (assuming I don't want to travel with my laptop and will be using internet cafes).


Some say buy more memory; some say burn cds; some say get a device such as a laptop, mp3 player, or digital wallet. Loading your pictures onto the internet is usually not a viable option, as it takes up a lot of bandwidth and time, and to get sufficient storage capacity at a web site you will have to pay. There are arguments for and against each of these options, as you will find in the results of your search.


Once you've downloaded your photos to computer (hard-drive or internet site) do you burn a copy to CD-Rom or do you print out wanted photos on a printer? My old laptop doesn't have a burner in it and I'm a bit loathe to fork out another few hundred for an external burner?


You aren't going to be hauling a printer along, are you? Assuming that you are talking about printing out selected pictures after you return home, I would suggest you have a photoshop, or one of the online services do it. I know that some home printers do a fairly good job, but to get good prints you need not only a good printer, but special paper. I keep all my pictures on one of my hard drives, backed up to another, but only print those special shots that I want to put into a book. The rest are better viewed on my monitor; or on a website if I want to share them.


I'm assuming that down the track the fact that I will no longer have to purchase film or actually pay for developing (except for those photos I really want), that the camera will pay for itself but at the moment it's all becoming quite expensive now that I'm confronted with the prospect of having to buy a burner, more memory, a printer etc.

Apart from that loving the experience of digital.

Thanks everyone in advance.
My cameral is a 5 mega-pixel, 3 x optical zoom but I am using it at the 3 mega-pixel and standard rather than fine setting which I am finding quite acceptable (and uses less battery/memory). What about you guys - do you find that this is ok or should I be using the higher (ie. 5 mpx and fine settings)?


The degraded settings you are using are probably good for snap-shot quality pictures, but not good enough for pictures that you want a large print of. The problem is you don't know which is that picture until after you've taken it. One drawback of digital cameras is that its hard to evaluate the quality of photos on the tiny screen. I suggest you use all of the capacity you have bought, after you have solved the memory/storage situation. I know also that since going digital I take far more pictures, even some of signs so I will know which church I was at for the picture, but I have enough storage to do that. I had anticipated that exhausted batteries would be a problem, so I bought a spare, but I have never needed it (my camera powers down when I am not actively shooting) and I only use it once in a while to run it down and recharge it.

As you have a laptop, you could use that for storage, but if you don't want to take it along, you will definitely need some way to offload pictures. I have an mp3 player that keeps me amused on the long plane ride, and has enough storage for all the pictures I could take. I prefer not to get cds burned while touring, as it takes time, and I don't want to have to haul a bunch of cds, nor risk breaking one. When you shell out the money to solve the storage problem, just think of it as money you will save from not buying and developing film!
clevelandbrown is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Thanks everyone for your help. I knew this would be where I'd find good stuff!! I've had an Mp3 player suggested to me before and considering I can get more use out of it than just saving photos this may be the way to go.
The technology revolution is leaving me behind I'm sad to say - so I'll just ask one more question. When I download my photos to an Mp3 player is it an easy enough process to then upload them from the Mp3 player to my laptop?

Thanks.
Daneille is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 05:21 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Danielle, you'll receive perhaps fewer and slower replies, but you do have a great resource of online info at www.dpreview.com in their "forum" section of the website.

You can use the "search" function there to locate almost anything you need to know about cameras. There are some "experts" who post with regularity there. The online glossary and the tutorials are helpful for a new digital user, as well.

Digital Photography Review online.
TripleSecDelay is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 09:36 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
just buy more memory...much easier. on vacation time is precious and you don't want to worry about what photos you've taken. and plus, unless you're viewing them properly it's impossible to tell what you've got on the lcd display. some of my best photos appeared to be duds on the lcd...
ucsun is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 11:33 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Buy extra memory. In your position I'd take at least 2 x 512Mb cards, and take pictures at the highest quality setting. You can get pictures downloaded to CD if need be. I'd take extra memory cards so that you're not left without a camera in the unlikely event that one is corrupted. I wouldn't use a laptop or CD burner because of the weight.
SidB is offline  
Old Dec 1st, 2004 | 11:58 PM
  #11  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
"...in the unlikely event that one is corrupted."
Are we still talking about the same thing?
TripleSecDelay is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 02:45 AM
  #12  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 0
First off, the size you are shooting at should be fine for most things. I also have a 5mp camera but shoot at resolutions that produce images of between 1 and 2 mp. It's easy enough to change the resolution on the spot when you are shooting a scene you really like and think you might want to blow up (printed). However, even at 1mp I have many beautiful 8x10s printed. Have even got some nice 11x14s. And as time goes on you'll probably print less than you originally think. Showing your photos on the computer (or TV if you have a DVD player) is much more fun than passing around a photo album.

Regarding how to save images when traveling. For the past four years I've used a "digital wallet" which is a tiny harddrive. Available from "Minds at Work" (google it). There are other similair products by other companies - in all cases you download your memory card to it and then transfer to computer when you get home. But they cost about $300 (they do hold 20-40gig). But now that memory cards have come down so much in price I'm not sure it's worth it to have a separate memory source. I would get at least one 512mb card. You are right that it will seem expensive at the begining but they last forever and after a few trips the savings on film and developing will really pay for it.

You can have a CD burned at any internet cafe in any city in Europe. Last summer they seemed to range from 5-10€ each. But they hold 700mb of data and the price is the same whether your memory card is a 32mb or a 512mb. Another reason to get the 512. The poster who said having a CD burned will cost as much as having film develped was right only if you are using a 32mb card. Think how much you'll save if you only have to burn a CD after shooting 512mb worth of images. And since you don't have a CD burner at home this makes the most sense. Then you'll have the CD with permanent storage and you can just pop it in your computer to edit, view, etc.

I personally don't edit my stuff while traveling. I save almost everything I shoot. You'd be surprised how much better (or worse) something looks on a real computer screen than on the camera's tiny screen. I average about 1000 shots a week when traveling. If you can afford it make the investment for memory cards now, you'll be glad you did when next year you find you spend almost nothing. You will love digital photography. My old Nikon SLR is all dusty and lonely in the closet as I never use it any more.
isabel is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 03:11 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
1,000 a week. That's a picture every 10 minutes day and night !
SidB is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 05:14 AM
  #14  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
I guess it depends on what you think your time abroad is worth. I travel to enjoy the sights and sounds and people and food, not to spend my time looking for a place where I can spend my limited time copying camera memory to disks, and verifying the results.

Figure out how much memory you'll need for the number of pictures you anticipate taking, buy enough chips to hold them, and get on with it. Watch edealinfo.com for bargains.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 05:47 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Hi Daneille

As others have written. what is the purpose of your photos? If you plan on enlarging past 8 by 10 the 3 MP setting may not be enough. (i have had excellent results with the Fuji though, blew up 11 by 15 on a 2 MP camera.

Size of memory stick- depends on the length of your trip. For a two week trip I took a 512 and 256 stick. If you use the review function in your camera to delete photos you dont really like a stick of 512 should be enough.

Where do i save to? Nothing special really, though i have seen a larger number of places that will copy the pictures on your memory stick to a CD. good as backup and not terribly expensive. (7 euro in Italy a few weeks ago)

printing- you can print directly from a number of new printers,many seem to make how old or new the computer is almost irrelevant. just stick the memory into the slow in the printer and follow the prompts...this might be a bit more difficult if you have a lot of pictures and only want to print a few.

You will find, realistically, that the digital camera will pay for itself after one of two vacations where you take a lot of good pictures. Buena suerte
Wildfire is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 06:15 AM
  #16  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Getting back to the OP question: always shoot at the highest resolution your camera is capable of, and figure out how much memory you will need on that basis.

Why? Because you might take a picture of a scene that you will later want to crop down to a fraction of its original size, and the more pixels that cropped image has in it, the better the print will look. For example, if you take a 5mp image and crop out half of its height and width, the resulting image will contain 1.25mp. However, if the original image is 3mp, the half-sized image will only have .75mp, which you can practically <i>count</i> in an enlargement of any useful size.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 06:48 AM
  #17  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
I debated flash cards vs microdrives and chose a IBM microdrive for my 4 MP Canon G3 (it doesn't use memory sticks and only came with a 32mb flash card....which I've never used at all). The microdrive is more useful for me than flash cards since it plugs right into my Apple Powerbook and could be used as a secondary drive...not that I've ever done that...but I could (it won't take a flash card). At a mid-level resolution, it holds more pictures than you could ever take on a trip. (I took about 2000 last year on a 3.5 wk trip to Italy...and just returned from a 9 day trip to Paris where I took about 450 pics.) And printing them out at 8.5 x 11 doesn't reveal any image degradation.

I would periodically review pics and delete the obvious throw-aways during the trips...but even if I didn't, running out of capacity was never a concern.

A bigger concern is getting the right power converter/adapter &amp; plugs for whatever country you're going to....assuming your camera doesn't use disposable batteries. (And they present a problem as well. Deb's Blackberry failed and, apparently, a AAA battery in Europe is different than here; it didn't work with new ones bought in Paris...but worked fine with new ones bought here. go figure.)

I think downloading to a computer or the internet and/or burning a cd during a trip would be a big hassel and a big waste of time.

My 1st trip more than paid for the camera + microdrive + 2nd battery as compared to what film and processing would have cost.

The biggest effort you'll make is editing all the pics you shoot. I now have 6 GB of pics...and they're accumulating faster than I can edit them.
Ramblero is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 06:50 AM
  #18  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Daneille,

Regarding the mp3 player. First, not all of them have the capacity to hold pictures, so you would have to check on that. Mine has a 20GB hard drive, which is plenty to hold music and pictures; it also does movies, but I've never tried that.

Transferring from the camera to the mp3 player usually requires some sort of interface (not all cameras use the same type of memory). Transferring from the mp3 player to the computer requires some way to hook them together; mine uses a usb cable, so you would have to check your computer and the mp3 player for compatibility.

Incidentally, the mp3 player with a noise cancelling headphone makes a long flight almost tolerable.
clevelandbrown is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #19  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
I would also add that shooting at max resolution is the only way to go... as has been mentioned you never know which picture you'll want to crop and/or blow-up on print. Depending on how many megabytes of data you produce during a set vacation time dictates which solution is best. The MP3 player with storage for pictures is generally a good idea if you want/need an MP3 player also, otherwise 2-3 large memory cards will usually do the trick. If you expect to use your laptop for anything else than downloading pictures bringing that one solves the problem, but if not again it's too heavy. I would at least make sure when you return that you have 2 physical copies of the pictures i.e. on 2 physicly seperated harddisks, on a CD or DVD and a harddrive etc. If you are feeling very paranoid make sure you've got that during your travels as well. In that case a laptop or storage device/mp3 player is a good idea for backup.

Sindre
Kahvi is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2004 | 07:28 AM
  #20  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
I use a 5 mp camera and shoot most pics on a fine or very fine setting( it's not the highest/tiff)

I just got back Venice canal scene that I had enlarged to 16x20 by an online processor.

I had never enlarged a digital photo that size before and was shocked to see how great it came out. It is extremeely clear and as good as a 35mm.

Now if only I could seel all of the extra rolls or 35mm film

Dick is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -