Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   Africa & the Middle East (https://www.fodors.com/community/africa-and-the-middle-east/)
-   -   Kirkman's Kamp versus Exeter River? (https://www.fodors.com/community/africa-and-the-middle-east/kirkmans-kamp-versus-exeter-river-848285/)

shouldbewriting Jul 6th, 2010 01:38 PM

Kirkman's Kamp versus Exeter River?
 
For a mid-range first time 12 day SA safari in September 2011, I'm trying to decide between these two camps for 4 of the nights. (There is a 4 for 3 special). KK would have potentially more people than ER, but apparently (according to posts which may now be out of date) longer game viewing times & less people in vehicle. Ngala Lodge has also been suggested for 4 nights (like the sound of waterhole & again the deal) but reviews a tad tepid on these boards and I worry about noisy young children. (Love the little dears, but maybe not on safari.) Final 4 at Forest Lodge, which all seem to like a lot. We may go on to Sodwana Bay, as we love to snorkel, though that sounds a bit iffy due to tides and winds. A bit too old for roughing it & flying from SF so need as much comfort as possible. Any info or added suggestions on any of above much appreciated! Also: is it likely I'll see lots of giraffe? Love those guys!

cary999 Jul 6th, 2010 03:44 PM

Maybe a little bit of help, I've been to Ngala Lodge 8 nights in Sep 2008 and Kirkmans Kamp 5 nights in Sep 2009. Kirkmans easily better in every way, except perhaps for meals/food equal. Forget Ngala Lodge. (Think Ngala Tented better).

Not been to Exeter but heard good things. Of all three Exeter Camps: River, Leadwood, Dulini. I'm sure they share traversing rights. I'm sure they would also be good as Kirkmans. How about logistics getting in and out, same? Both in Sabi Sand but at different ends and both run by &Beyond.

regards - tom

living4safari Jul 6th, 2010 10:58 PM

Hi there

I've stayed at both Kirkmans and ERL. Kirkmans has a very old-worldly feel to it, it is a beautiful property and the game viewing was also very good when we were there. Unfortunately you don't have the type of views from the rooms and quite the nice setting that you would have at ERL. Exeter River Lodge is one of my favourite lodges due to the fact that they are situated on the river and the rooms were built to maximise the view. The lounge/dining area also has wonderful views and we were served lunch under a huge tree next to the river every afternoon - pure bliss. If it is about luxury, I would definitely go ERL. Rangers at both lodges are well trained and I enjoyed the food at both as well. Game viewing at ERL was also excellent.

Kind regards

KK01 Jul 7th, 2010 12:54 AM

Hello,

I've stayed extensively at both lodges(Kirkman's and Exeter).
When it comes to accommodation Exeter is more luxurious than Kirkman's. The question you've got to ask yourself is: How much time do I really want to spend in my room?

Food is very similar at both lodges aswell as the staff.

Game viewing has two main facets:
Firstly, like you mentioned, Kirkman's do put less people in a game drive vehicle. they keep it to max 6 whereas Exeter go up to 8 if it's full.
Secondly, Quality vs Quantity. Exeter is situated in the Western Sector of the Sabi Sands and shares 10 000ha(22 000acres) with ten other lodges. Approx. 25 game drive vehicles. (400 ha per game drive vehicle) With more vehicles out, there's a bigger chance of someone finding something somewhere...Thus a bigger quantity of sightings. But a limit of max 25 minutes is usually applied at cat sightings.
Kirkman's Kamp will only send out 6(maybe 7) vehicles on 6300ha. Thats 1050ha per vehicle. So that means that when something is found, quality time can be spent with the animal. It's all up to your motives regarding what you want out of your safari.

I recently stayed at Phinda Forest lodge and loved it immensely! With almost double the number of bird species than Kruger, it's a birder's paradise!! Getting there is a bit pricey though...

My personal choice would be andBeyond Kirkman's Kamp. Quality game viewing, great rangers, good food and great overall guest experience!

Kind Regards,

KK01

HariS Jul 7th, 2010 01:35 AM

Agree with KK01. Western Sabi is all about Quantity. Too many lodges for my liking. I was at Exeter, though it was Dulini Lodge. Fantastic lodge and service. Cars at Dulini were not over-crowded. Sightings in that Western Sector were all on a queue system and really frustrating in terms of photography.

That said, I have not been to Kirkmans. But, I'm sure it's fantastic in every way and beyond .......

living4safari Jul 7th, 2010 01:45 AM

I forgot to mention that I've stayed at Phinda Forest Lodge a number of times and never less than four days at a time. It is one of my favourite places in the whole world - the birding, game viewing, food, staff, rooms...everything is just wonderful...so enjoy that!!
Kind regards

shouldbewriting Jul 7th, 2010 02:29 PM

Thank you all! What a great resource this is! Of course I am now quite conflicted! We never do "luxury", so that is sounding quite appealing -- I love the thought of that river view from the room at ERL, with maybe elephants wandering by. Late Sept. is low season, so maybe not too busy in vehicles.

KKO1: since I have never been on safari, it is hard for me to truly get the impact of the two game drive styles, though I understand what you're saying. Sounds like at ERL there's a chance of more sightings for shorter periods of time & maybe more people in vehicle.

Tom: Was the game viewing what really put you off Ngala (I read your report) or the overall experience? I would like to stay somewhere with a watering hole & that does not seem so common in SA, at least from what I've seen so far. Would it give a better/more diverse experience (animals & topography)to include Timbavati as well as Sabi Sand? Or not...

living4safari: Since there are apparently several (7?) different kinds of habitat in Phinda, would you think we'd be seeing them all in a 4 night stay? Or is that why you stay longer?

Appreciate everyone's comments. All best.

Atlantasuger Jul 7th, 2010 05:13 PM

We are staying at Ngala lodge in September-is really that bad?

atravelynn Jul 7th, 2010 07:21 PM

I'll just respond to the Phinda habitat question. A four night stay allows 2 nights in the south at Rock (pricier) or Mountain (more moderate) and 2 nights in the north at Vlei (pricier) or Forest (more moderate). The north has the unique sand forest habitat and broadleaf forest habitat. The south has the mountains and the river.

You could see all the habitats in a 2-night stay if that were your goal. I stayed one week at Forest.

One reason to spend several days, besides it being a great place, is there are also about 7 different activities including walks, leopard tracking, aerial safaris, rhino tracking, canoe/kayak/boating & cultural activities. You could do something different every day for a week. I spent 3 mornings tracking rhino, for example, among other activities.

cary999 Jul 7th, 2010 10:34 PM

Summarize Ngala Lodge in 25 words or less-
Rooms average. Camp staff, and food/meals excellent. EVERY game drive "wasted" 30 minutes -each way- by going way south to adjacent property near Ngala Tented. My guide below average, I changed after a few days. Overall game viewing average. (Ok, so 37 words).

Timbavati and/or Sabi Sand. Very similar terrain, not big difference. (They are only about 10 miles apart). But if you are staying 8-12 days in that area then you should stay in 2-3 camps just for the different camp and guides. I like camps stays of 4 or more nights. Would not necessarily move from Sabi Sand to Timbavati if you find two camps in one that you are interested in. Charter air between these reserves-camps is typically $150-200 per person.

Your game drive guide/ranger will really make or break your game drives. By far the most important person to/for you in camp. (Yes, even more than the chef :) ).

Know you said you read my report, for anyone else, FWIW, my Fodors report that included Ngala Lodge -
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...4&tid=35161085

regards - tom

living4safari Jul 7th, 2010 11:34 PM

We usually see all seven habitats even though we only stay at Forest Lodge. I've been on more than one specialist safaris there which also makes a difference, because then you have your own private vehicle and you can literally go where you want to on the property without having to be concerned about other guests on the vehicle (that is the ideal!). To me, Phinda = paradise. The canoeing is almost a MUST and so is tracking on foot.
Kind regards

KK01 Jul 8th, 2010 07:51 AM

SBW,

I see you are really hanging on to the romantic scene of lying in bed and seeing elephants come drink from the water source right infront of your room. This is great and I'll definitely recommend ERL in that case. Late Sep is a perfect time to spend 4 nights at a lodge situated on the Sand River. You'll have some of the best game viewing in Africa in a very luxurious setting.

Regarding Phinda - I have to say that Phinda offers a bigger variety of things to do.(incl. all the above mentioned in ann's post) Spending time on a boat on the Mzinene river was absolutely amazing. Seeing birds that do NOT occur anywhere else in the world. Walking in the magnificent Sand Forest surrounded with 2000 year old Lebombo Wattles(BTW, 1100ha of the remaining 4000ha of the world's Sand Forest is located on Phinda Private Game Reserve). This is truly a special place on this amazing earth. If you choose Phinda, don't split the 4 nights. It's really easy to see the southern, more rocky area of phinda. Your guide will try to show you all the different habitats Phinda has to offer anyway.

Hope this helps.

Kind Regards,

KK

atravelynn Jul 8th, 2010 10:49 AM

Parts of the sand forest, mentioned in such glowing terms above, permit you to walk around safely by yourself on trails between the Forest Lodge cottages. Some of my best antelope and monkey photos were taken as I just wandered around. The Forest Lodge location allows you to maximize your time in this beautiful setting and do so at your own pace between scheduled activities.

You should be aware that Phinda is a fenced reserve of around 55,000 acres.

I believe there is still a walking camp you can book that is located in the north. As I recall this was a less expensive option than the other lodges and you could pick the # of days you wanted to spend. The walks from camp were primarily done in the morning and then drives were done in the afternoon, turning into night drives. If you were going to do lots of walking anyway, I think this would be an attractive alternative (not just for budget reasons) and one I'd look into on a return trip.

KK01 Jul 8th, 2010 12:54 PM

Phinda do not offer Walking safaris anymore. The camp was shut down.

A brand new hide has been built at Forest lodge and I saw 7 Green twinspots bathing together at 10h in the morning. A very rare bird to see at Phinda. Magical place indeed!

Phinda is indeed fenced but so is Kruger, Sabi Sands, Timbivati etc. Every game reserve in the world is fenced. That's just the way it is...Phinda Private Game Reserve is one of the best conservation success stories I have ever encountered and I am so happy to have witnessed the final result.

cary999 Jul 8th, 2010 02:17 PM

Fenced, so is planet earth compared to the universe. Phinda is 23,000 hectares, Kruger 2,000,000 hectares. Kruger about 90 times larger than Phinda. No comparison. Kruger about the size of our state New Jersey. Phinda about the size of Brooklyn NY.

Also, re Timbavati and Sabi Sand. They are fenced as an extension of Kruger. That is, their east side is open to Kruger so game is free to migrate both ways. In some sense you could say that the Timbavati and Sabi Sand are as large a Kruger. Of course one big difference is that the two reserves are private property not National Park.

regards - tom
ps - a hectare is 10,000 square meters. In English acres a hectare is about 2.5 times larger. E.g. Phinda is 57,000 acres.

shouldbewriting Jul 8th, 2010 04:01 PM

"To me, Phinda = paradise."

"Late Sep is a perfect time to spend 4 nights at a lodge situated on the Sand River. You'll have some of the best game viewing in Africa in a very luxurious setting."

"Seeing birds that do NOT occur anywhere else in the world"

"The Forest Lodge location allows you to maximize your time in this beautiful setting and do so at your own pace between scheduled activities."

Gee, I wonder why I am now so excited??!!

Thanks to all for sharing knowledge & enthusiasm!

Best, Liz

PS -- still chewing on Ngala Lodge -- guess there is an airstrip; my husband would hate that...

Atlantasuger Jul 8th, 2010 05:30 PM

What do you mean about the airstrip?

mytmoss Jul 8th, 2010 06:03 PM

I have been to both Phinda Forrest (twice) and Ngala Tented once. I have no plans to ever go back to Ngala.

There is no comparison to me between the two lodges. Phinda game viewing was excellent except for leopard, and its my understanding that the leopard viewing has greatly improved since I was there. The food was great and the staff was great. The idea that its fenced was a completely non issue for me as I never saw the fence.

My experience at Ngala Tented was at best OK. The tents were nice but when windy, they were noisy and the monkeys would play on them, creating a racket. The food was OK, but not great. My ranger was nice, but like Cary999, inexperienced. Fortunately I had a good tracker which helped. My game viewing experience there was not that great with the huge exception of seeing wild dog. I will credit the ranger with great viewing, but that was the only thing of merit in 3 days.

I would highly recommend Phinda over Ngala. If the leopard sightings are what they say now, it would be fantastic. However wild dog sighting, if that is important, would not likely exist at Phinda.

Mike

shouldbewriting Jul 8th, 2010 06:24 PM

Atlantasugar: there is an airstrip next to Ngala Lodge (not N. Tented, which mytmoss is referring to.) My agent tell me there would be approx. 2 flights in & 2 out per day. Probably not major for most, especially if you are out looking for stuff, but my husband has a "thing" about noise from small aircraft & can hear it miles off. Not sure it's going to be the place for us, though apparently a very good value with good game viewing. (Though, as noted, possibly not for the expert photographer, as per Tom.)

KK01 Jul 8th, 2010 11:24 PM

Tom,

I am merely pointing out that seeing a fence on a game drive should not be such a bad thing seeing that all other reserves have them. Keeping in mind that Phinda uses every opportunity to drop fences with neighbouring properties, this is gives a guest the chance to appreciate where his/her money is going to preserve the magnificent beauty of nature.

Kind Regards,

KK


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:47 PM.