![]() |
What would make you participate in Fodor's forums more fully?
I'm curious about what would make people engage with Fodor's forums more fully. I'm sure we each have our own reasons for participating at whatever level we do, but maybe some of us -- and IB in particular -- would find some value in hearing our thoughts.
I'll start off with some of my suggestions, the bottom line of which is: Make us feel good! :)
|
Good question! I hope this stands to allow discussion.
But I am already participating fully. I'm on the forums most days checking on any areas I might have experience in (destinations or general topics). I'm not thrilled with the recent step-up in moderation moving threads around, deleting people's comment on Lounge topics, etc. And the "related threads" and new "trending topics" are of zero use to me. But none of this negative enough to make me quit. As far as information I personally need to my own vacation planning purposes, that comes from Trip Advisor. There just isn't much participation here for places I need help with... well until and when I can get a Europe trip on the horizon again. thanks for asking... |
.. you see the problem, right? No one reads this forum.
What would make me participate more fully in Fodor's would be if more people participated on Fodor's. So a catch 22 going on. |
I agree there's a bit of a catch-22, suze, but still, this thread has been viewed 278 times. Maybe you have a better idea about how to generate ideas for IB's consideration about how to increase the value of the forums? I'd love to hear it -- even from people like you who DO participate as fully as possible!
|
I'm not sure quantity, i.e., participating more fully, is what Fodor's needs. Quality might be a better goal. Less is more. In addition, the Lounge needs to go to some hidden corner of the site, if not banished altogether. It's mostly nonsense, and has nothing to offer regarding travel. Is that not why Fodor's says not to post travel topics there? Well then, remove it from the 'Travel Talk Forums'. Maybe Fodor's uses it simply as click bait. Probably Travel Tips and Trip ideas should be eliminated as well, and simply made as an additional option when posting a question or Trip Report. I also think regular participants should refrain from commenting on threads on which they don't have any personal experience regardless of their Googling prowess. Most folks that ask questions in the forums are capable enough of Googling themselves and can sense the phoniness. I think regulars should do more trip reports, even if it's just a couple of sentences and a picture or 2. Even if it's a place you go to regularly and not much is necessarily new to you It shows you actually care about content on the forum, rather than just upping your post count. I think of recent posts by Daniel, Shellyk & MmePerdu. Something other than 'I'm here in X'. That's not a trip report. That's just being lazy. It'd be nice too if those that ask a question could offer some sort of acknowledgement either as a trip report or a simple thank you. How that happens, I dunno.
Anyway, I think some of those things might make the forums better, although I don't know if I'd participate any more than I do. I suppose I could post in any number of forums if I was a pretend travel agent. I really liked Venezuela, but there's not much current interest there. I tend to stick to what I know or where I've been recently. What or who is IB? |
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, baldone!
Originally Posted by baldone
(Post 16997890)
What or who is IB?
|
An interesting question KJA - best of luck getting some sensible input!
I did start typing a reply, but it quickly turned into a rant about what I don’t like about these forums rather that what could be done to improve them. Then I read baldone’s eminently sensible and more well balanced response and deleted it! I totally agree that a lot more attention should be on encouraging quality rather than quantity. Way too many, long standing members, people focused on getting their "post count" numbers as high as possible and rather than impart knowledge and information in their posts, just post for the sake of it. No point in having 50k posts to ones name if only 500 are actually helpful. Another pet peeve. When responding to a post - answer the bloody question! Too many response just do not address the question asked and seemed aimed at demonstrating the poster’s superior knowledge of some vaguely connected subject. Alternatively, it is -Oh, I wouldn’t do that if I were you or "don’t post here, no one will read it" etc. It’s ok to provide opinions but make them positive and pertinent, rather than negative and irrelevant. Certain members, yourself and Baldone amongst them have been exceptionally helpful to me in planning recent trips. Mainly because I know you have actually been to the places you are commenting on and keep your posts relevant to the question as well as offering up other ideas I hadnt considered. Yestravel , Glover, CaliforniaLady, Kathie, Marmot immediately spring to mind ( not an exclusive list,) TRIP REPORTS - My intention is to post a report on our forthcoming trip to South Africa in a sort of repayment for the help in planning that trip. The reality is that few will likely read it but if it helps lift the traffic a little great. TRs used to be a big feature of these forums and very helpful but maybe travel blogging has replaces them. I know that is where most of my efforts go. If someone goes to the trouble of posting TR and people find it useful - make a point of saying so, not just visiting the post. TOO MANY FORUMS - as mentioned above, some forums are seeing much less traffic than others. South America, Mexico and Central America used to one forum and was much better for it. USA and Canada could probably be combined. Is there any need or relevance to things like Air Travel & Cruises? I do thing that fewer but more encompassing forums would result in increased traffic and encourage cross fertilisation of ideas. e.g. many will combine Central with South America - USA with Canada. FREE GIFTS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I have lost count of the number of book Fodor’s sent to me over the years. Nic eto have and to be quoted in said books but I am not sure it actually encouraged me to do more. Maybe some form of acknowledgement similar to the "Destination Expert" tag on TripAdvisor. Maybe combine that with the "moderator" role. Any forum belongs to its members and, in reality there is only so much the organisers can do to facilitate a healthy and informative exchange of views. It is really down to the individual forum members to up the quality. With apologies to JFK "ask not what Fodors can do for your, ask what you can do for Fodors" PS good job I didn’t post my rant! |
I try and add positive help to travellers but the snark runs off new posters quickly. I am an old poster and have asked maybe two questions. I go to Rick Steves or my Facebook group or TA. TA has helped me a lot with transportation help since we do public in many places. If I asked here I would get a lecture on how you can't see anything unless you rent a car and how easy it is. BS on that. Prime example is the diplonat's wufe driving on the wrong side of the road and killing that young boy in England and then running back to the US.
|
I'm one for quality versus quantity. But unless “every” post is scrubbed to meet the posting guidelines (and who wants to do that?) there will always be people who ask the subjective questions like "What are the must-sees in MajorCity?" or the equally so, “Ten Days for London, Paris, Amsterdam and Belgium. Itinerary Help, Please!” And there will always be people who respond with genuine help. Or with genuine sarcasm.
On the subject of quality, I would love for the Lounge to disappear. I think having it cheapens the website; and the bad manners expressed there on a regular basis add no value to the travel community. "Destination Expert" a la Trip Advisor is the one reason I don't engage on TA. Some members here already consider themselves as such and that's enough ego for the boards. I can envision a devolution to members debating who is “more of an expert.” Anything that encourages competition on Fodors would discourage me from participating. I appreciate very much the advice and help I receive, and try to give back with helpful responses with trip reports, but I neither need nor want to somehow be rewarded for doing so. I know Fodors doesn't permit touting one's travel blog as the sole "Trip Report" to be posted, but it would be nice to have a category with nothing but links to member’s travel blogs (entirely voluntary) and also keep the TR format requirement for posting. I like reading Trip Reports but often they get bogged down with extra commentary and then I don’t return to finish; I also like looking at the photos but not necessarily opening each link. With a Blog category I could choose to “cut to the chase” or follow along for the ride in the forums. |
I think "posting guidelines for newbies" would help cut down on snark and unanswerable first posts. Either a sticky or something sent on sign up.
I'm not convinced that banishing Travel Tips is a good idea, it's the only place for threads that aren't destination specific. I mostly avoid the Lounge so have no strong opinions on whether it should stay. If it keeps off topic snark out of the destination forums I am in favor of it. If I asked here I would get a lecture on how you can't see anything unless you rent a car and how easy it is |
I agree with a lot of what baldone wrote. I gave up on the lounge about a year ago. I just left one day, no regrets at all. fourfortravel summed it up well.
I know my wish list is impossible, but I do think the forums would be much better and draw more people and be of better value if everyone would check their ego at the door. Not everyone travels the same way. I like fast travel, I like things other posters do not. That is ok, just as it is ok for others to like other ways. Also, post on your personal experiences and do not put down other peoples personal experiences. There are some posters that no matter what you post are going to attack you and that is just wrong. Since these posters can't seem to practice self control, I actually would opt for more moderation. Let the bad behavior have consequences. |
I guess I am in the minority here, but I enjoy the "lounge". Yes, there are certain people who seem to always be looking for some sort of conflict, but there is also a feeling of camaraderie there.
mms suggestion of checking egos at the door is a great one and would help avoid a good deal of the conflicts. |
Thursday, it is mostly when talking about Ireland. We are hopefully changing that by proving that you can see hidden treasures without the car. I appreciate my husband driving in France for his WW1 trips. We did take a one day tour last year and it was worth the money not to drive pluse the guy was amazing. I gave up the lounge for two years and it was nice but tend to hit new post and you get it all. I just don't read or reply to certain political ones.
|
"I know my wish list is impossible, but I do think the forums would be much better and draw more people and be of better value if everyone would check their ego at the door."
This is a good point against a "Destination Expert." Certain egos are strong on these boards and this would drive a wedge into what should be an inclusive community. Speaking of inclusivity, schmerl, fair enough that you enjoy the Lounge. But quite often this camaraderie is based on one's political leaning, and if you're not part of "The Club" the minions swarm. "So, just ignore the political posts..." you might say. I generally do. Mostly I ignore the Lounge altogether because I can look at a post title and predict how the "discussion" is proceeding. What value is any of this to new members? Online forums are rather old-school and I can see their appeal; but why accelerate their decline by servicing garbage non travel-related content? |
It's obvious that IB has interest only in quantity (clicks) and not quality. The constant website tweaks in a vain attempt to drive traffic, leading to various "fails" when attempting to post are truly annoying.
Certain forums have "bosses" and group-think cliques which lead me not to ask questions or comment much. (Europe and California in particular). While I'm in favor of less moderation, I do wish people would only answer from personal, recent experience. Too much of the "I've been to the opposite side of the country but people tell me" or "I was there twice a long time ago" by prolific posters who need to chime in on everything on "their" forum. It would be nice if posters would disclose just how long ago that visit was. Things can change a lot in 10 or 20 years, if not 5. Dead and dying I'm afraid but I appreciate those of you like kja and crellston who hang in there with trip reports. Yes, blogging is the new Fodors. |
Maybe you have a better idea about how to generate ideas for IB's consideration about how to increase the value of the forums?
No, sorry I've got nothing. And believe they have a business model they are implementing that is not open to our input. I wish they'd lighten up on the overly enthusiastic moderation that seems the latest style. If you don't like the Lounge don't go there. It is not meant to offer anything regarding travel, that's the whole idea. There are typically all of about 43 people there these days so hardly problematic. |
fourfortravel--I agree about the DE comment, and I am a DE, lol. I think too many times people think they have to be an expert, and that the experts opinions are the only ones worth anything. Completely false. There are terrible DE's and excellent non DE's. Your comments about the lounge are my feelings about it as well.
mlgb--I agree regarding bosses, group think etc. Also, yes, recent experience is the best, and if it isn't recent then at least say when it was so people can decide for themselves. |
Negative critiques of what others choose to contribute does not build a forum either. As long as people are truthful and transparent I see no problem saying... "I looked this up for you on Google" or "here are the best online maps I found for the city" or "I was in Paris but 10 years ago" or "this is a 2nd hand story told to me by someone I met on the plane". As long as you are clear about where what you said came from, the person reading can decide the value or lack thereof.
If we have to meet the criteria given in these few posts above you will have even LESS people on the forum than there are now. I feel the biggest problem with Fodor's is the low number of participants as it is. |
suze--I agree about being transparent. If people would do that, it would solve a lot of the issues, IMO. The issue is people not being truthful.
|
Every change in format and every change in ownership caused a loss of regulars and traffic. So, to help this site, STOP CHANGING THINGS! Oh, and don't let regulars die.
|
I find this forum very helpful, and love to read trip reports. I do find the USA and Canada forums pretty quiet; therefore uninteresting. I do go on though, in case I can answer a question for the CDN forum.
Like any forum, the interest lies in the updated posts. No point coming on if there is no action. So sometimes I will post a view or opinion even if my info is a bit outdated, or I haven't been to every village in the south of France. :) |
Such thoughtful answers! One thing that strikes me: There is something we can all do to add both quality and clicks, and maybe make people feel better, and that's to acknowledge each other -- to say thank you for advice or for trip reports. From my perspective, one doesn't actually have to find advice directly helpful to appreciate that someone took the time to provide it and to express that appreciation. And I'll never understand why people read trip reports without saying something, anything! Ah well, to each his/her own. As many of you do (but many Fodorite's don't), we can, when appropriate, acknowledge the responses of prior Fodorites when responding to an OP -- that won't add to clicks (I'm certainly not suggesting that we should all start posting "good idea" to every post!) -- but it could contribute to a collaborative, rather than competitive, tone. Another thing that strikes me is that we all have our pet peeves. I'd guess that there are as many ways of giving advice as there are ways to travel -- and I think that's to the advantage of anyone who posts a question. I choose to believe that people mean well, whether I agree with their advice or with the way they provide it or whatever. And I choose to (at least try to) contemplate the possibility that what seems to me to be snark may be because of the way I'm reading it, not the intent behind the writing of it. I'm well aware that I could be mistaken, but I'd rather err in people's favor than against them. Too, I know that I certainly say things that aren't particularly constructive -- I'm still learning ways to be more effective and more sensitive in my comments, and I appreciate it when people give me the benefit of the doubt. To further abuse JFK, maybe: "Ask not what Fodor's can do for you; ask what you can do for others who post on Fodor's." In case anyone at IB actually pays attention, I'll add my comments on a few of the ideas offered so far:
One last thing: Obviously some of you disagree, but I'd like to offer my sincere thanks to our moderators! I certainly don't know everything they do, and I don't agree with every decision that I know they have made, but I think they do an incredible job -- and they do it almost thanklessly, at least from my read of the their reception. IMO, no one needs to read some of the vile insults that get posted from time to time, and I'm sincerely glad that the moderators remove them. Kudos, moderators! :star: :star: :star: Looking forward to hearing more! |
Originally Posted by kja
(Post 16998347)
I like having a "Travel Tips" forum -- witness my use of it for this thread. : |
Quality clicks are worth something. Just clicks aren't. That means people have to stay . If somebody finds the forum via google and leaves after 30 seconds for whatever reason it's a click but it's a fairly worthless click.
I think of the DE more like moderators light. They answer the questions the rest would rather just roll their eyes at. I remember somebody asking if there was a Catholic church in Rome Italy. I kid you not. They hopefully correct the really outrageous comments some people make in answers. . If you want more participation the answer was alluded to above. Have more interesting threads for people to read and comment on. How? No idea. But it's almost 2020. Shouldn't it be easier to have images? |
"Dead and dying I'm afraid but I appreciate those of you like kja and crellston who hang in there with trip reports." Thank you mlgb. My intention with our South Africa trip is to post as we go here and then expand on that in our blog when I have the time. When future questions arise, I will no doubt provide links to our blog simply to avoid repetition.
Somewhere above, someone asked the question "how is it possible to make the forums more interesting" Can I just say that your own post are amongst the most helpful on these forums. Why? Because you actually take the time to read and understand the question being asked before answering clearly and concisely. The help you have provided to me personally in travelling around South America invaluable. Lima would not have become one of my favourite cities in the world if it were not for you. Of course the owners of this site are primarily concerned with the quantity of clicks rather than the quality of the contents. That is what drives their advertising revenues. However, the two factors are inextricably linked. Without decent content who will visit more than once? A little guidance on how to ask and answer questions, present trip reports might help, although it is always very difficult to get people to change there habits. Chicken and egg I suppose! The suggestion of creating Destination Experts seems not to be a popular one. My short experience on being a DE on trip advisor seems to be a little of what the above post #24 suggests - answering the posts no one else will and sometimes correcting erroneous info. The advantage is that I always get notified anytime a post for my particular forum happens so I can answer straight away. I think this can only encourage new member when their questions are answered quickly. That said, I have never been too sure why I was chosen to be a DE as I have far more in-depth experience of a dozen or more places other than the one I was appointed for! Moderators are a different matter. It is quite easy to work out who a few are as they sometimes forget to log out of their moderator accounts and into their personal accounts and VV when posting. One of those springs to mind as one of the more prolific posters of put down and snarky comments which makes me question how they were chosen in the first place. I confess it has crossed my mind more than once over the past year just to quit these forums as the traffic has declined. I am sure that others feel the same which is a shame, but maybe we need to accept that with the ageing membership demographic Fodors needs to do something to attract a younger participant. Will I still be asking myself this question this time next year? |
Oh no! In my effort to keep this thread focused on what we can do, I decided to keep my comments at a high level -- I didn't want to constrain the flow of the interchange of ideas. But in pursuit of that goal, I failed to do what I just asked that we all do, namely, to acknowledge one another. My bad! So, as the OP, let me offer at least a few words to each of you who have posted so far. I'll address you each in alphabetical order; I will not try to address all of the intriguing and thought-provoking comments you have offered. @ AJPeabody: I agree that change can be -- and has proven to be -- disruptive, and that IB should take the opinions of regulars into consideration before implementing changes that drive us away. I'm not sure they can keep us from death ;) but if they can, by all means, I agree that they should not let regulars die without consulting us! @ baldone: IB might want our clicks, regardless of quality, but as users, I think we agree that we prefer quality. Thank you for focusing our attention on quality! :tu: @ crellston: IMO, your cogent analysis forces us to focus on what we, as individuals, can do to make things better. While aware that those who participate in this particular thread are, perhaps, preaching to the choir, I think you have effectively drawn attention to the importance of posting with attention to the usefulness of advice, even if we don't always agree about what that means. @ fourfortravel: Your argument against the ways in which designations of expertise promote unwanted competition is, IMO, compelling -- thanks! @ Macross: You provide an important cautionary note about how enthusiasm for a particular mode of travel can discourage others: IMO, it is important to acknowledge alternatives, for example, noting when public transportation provides an alternative to renting a car, since there are pros and cons to each. @ mdinbc: What a great point about why people with possibly outdated information might comment! There can be value in even old information, and there can also be value to "bouncing" a thread to the top. :star: @ mlgb: I can't argue against your perceptions, but please don't abandon us, annoying as the ever "improving" Fodor's experience becomes! Instead, maybe you can help us find a way to deal with "'bosses' and group-think cliques" -- if through no other means than by encouraging each other to "speak truth to power" by describing one's own experiences, no matter what others have said. @ mms: I agree that bad behavior should have consequences, at least if repeated! My blood pressure rises when I see new threads by people who have, in the past, regularly attacked other posters. I never expected to use the "ignore" function, but I've learned to appreciate it. :) @ schmerl: I'm glad you find a feeling of camaraderie in the lounge, and maybe that's an argument to keep it. I must admit that my experiences of the lounge have been quite different. Nonetheless, as noted above (post 22), I see value in keeping it. @ suze: IMO, you've nicely highlighted the "Catch-22" difficulty we face. :( @ thursdaysd: Your words drew attention to the message that is actually sent to those who now sign up for Fodor's -- and I admit that I'd love to see it! Just not enough to try doing so. ;) I suspect that several of us might have suggestions about how to make it more welcoming and more useful. I could be wrong. @ Traveler_Nick: That's an interesting perspective on the role that could be played by "experts"! I wonder if there's a way to implement an initial "screen" that ensures that a new OP on Fodor's gets a constructive response to even a wildly bizarre request, without "clogging" the main forum with that initial interchange. Not that that's what you were suggesting... just a thought you inspired. Again, I'm not trying to diminish any one's comments by focusing on just one or two elements -- I just want to acknowledge each of you without limiting or constraining our conversation. Please keep your ideas coming, despite the awkwardness of my shepherding of this thread! |
@ crellston: You posted even as I was drafting a post that now follows yours, and I'm afraid I won't have time to take your response fully on board in the few moments I can spare just now, but I want to thank both you and mlgb for your help and kind words over the years, and to say how much I hope you both continue to participate on Fodor's. More tomorrow.
|
If it were not for the lounge posts, I probably would only visit here for trip planning and reporting, which would be far less frequent. I always click the "new posts" list, so I will sometimes see a travel post I could comment on.
As for blogs vs trip reports, I rarely click links within posts (paranoia?). When I do a trip report, I write it in a word processor then copy paste into Fodors. Travel bloggers who post abbreviated trip reports here would do well to copy paste the good parts of their blogs onto Fodors, although the standard relinquishment of ownership rights to Fodors might be a deterrent. Perhaps adding a copyright notice to the blog extracts may be protective. I don't know. I'm not a lawyer. and I don't play one on the internet. |
crellston--You comments regarding the moderators is interesting. I saw that happen once, where a moderator posted her personal comments, but on her moderator user name. It was changed immediately, but I saw it. That was from a very nice poster, but I still very much disagree with having users being moderators, and not saying who they are. A moderator needs to be unbiased, IMO.
|
It does not seem very professional the way it is handled.
|
Professionals are paid. |
Good point, AJ. Hadn't considered the copyright protection issue. I was assuming most bloggers use a copywriter protection feature.
Still, perhaps the powers-that-be could work on that somehow. I follow a number of travel bloggers and it's nice to read a story in its entirety and without the cut-ins of conversation. |
Thank you crellston for the kind words. And thank you to kja also.
It's really the quality of certain posters who I "know" which keep me coming back to Fodors and inspire me to branch out to more "exotic" locations. Re blogs, if they're on Wordpress or some of the other platforms (even the old Blogger) I'm more likely to peek at them, and I won't look if the link doesn't show up as "safe" on my browser. |
This thread is great! We really appreciate the insights on how to make the Fodor's forum a better place.
I think the occasional gift offer is a great idea! Looking forward to more suggestions! |
@ crellston: Another thoughtful response. :star: Thanks, and please don't quit Fodor's! It's always nice to have new members, including those who are new or relatively new to travel, but from my perspective, the greatest value that Fodor's provides to its readers (new or old, experienced or not, signed in or not) -- and the thing that will allow it to bring in new posters (even new clicks) in the future -- is the input of experienced and thoughtful travelers. IMO, you are such a traveler. (I won't try to list others -- I'd hate to inadvertently omit anyone!) Maybe I should ask: What will keep experienced, thoughtful travelers -- like you! -- engaged with Fodor's? @ mlgb: Ditto! @ AJPeabody: Another good reason to keep the lounge! @ crellston, @ mms, @ suze, & @ thursdaysd: .....I suspect that Fodorites will always disagree about the merits of our moderators, and sincerely hope that we can avoid turning this thread into rehashing those questions. I admit that it was unwise of me to summarize my view of them along with other themes from this thread. @ AJPeabody, @ fourfortravel, &@ mlgb: .....blogs do introduce another layer of complexity, don't they? I admit that I rarely open links to blogs, and generally do so only when I'm convinced that I will find the traveler's blogs of particular interest. And only if they show up as "safe"! Same (for me) with links to photo albums. @ IBanna: Thanks so much for reading this thread and letting us know that you've found it helpful! *** IB is paying attention! I look forward to seeing other ideas that they might be able to implement. *** |
I have deleted several posts that referenced posts that were deleted because they contained attacks on another poster.
|
Originally Posted by Moderator3
(Post 16999042)
I have deleted several posts that referenced posts that were deleted because they contained attacks on another poster.
|
Kja, to answer your question, I would participate more fully if I traveled more often and went on longer trips. I have a tendency to log on to fodors only when I am planning a trip, and I participate in the forums or answer questions randomly during that time based on my more recent travel experiences. My responses tend to be relatively short. The typical poster on the fodors forums is an experienced traveler who seeks a more immersive experience and is able to articulate these experiences in an engaging manner. I sense less interest or tolerance in logistics and plain tourism on these forums, that seems to be more the style of tripadvisor as some members have pointed out. So in that sense I think Fodors is getting full participation from its members, unless they want to change their profile.
|
Originally Posted by vipsha
(Post 16999059)
I would participate more fully if I traveled more often and went on longer trips.
Thanks for sharing your perspective, vipsha -- the differences between posters and forums is interesting, isn't it? |
I would be happy to share my trips and tips, but I don't travel in a noteworthy way by Fodor's standards, like what people would photograph and blog about.
So I have to stick to helping (and I do, daily) about using public transportation in Seattle, about hotels and activities in Puerto Vallarta or Waikiki. A few places in the Caribbean, my favorite towns in Switzerland. On the Solo Travel forum I'm really good (i think) at just helping newbies understand and do the math about why they can't see half a dozen countries in a one week trip :-) and why it's OK to eat dinner alone. Or why maybe your very first time leaving home doesn't need to be a RTW 6-month adventure. Different people have have different things they can help with. I wish that posters didn't attack each other. That would probably be my #1 input. To me is the biggest negative on this forum. Why people have to critique others contributions and spew hateful messages. That to me doesn't serve anyone well. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 AM. |