San Francisco as a base for Yosemite?
 

Planning a trip to San Francisco with just my husband. If I only have 3 days is a day trip to Yosemite worth it. We are going to go to sequoia National Park for 3 nights then to Hearst castle and up the cost to San Francisco. We only have 2-3 nights in San Francisco and want to see Alcatraz. We chose sequoia national over Yosemite since the sequoia groves in Yosemite are closed until 2017. It is likely to be our one and only trip to California. What are the must sees in San Francisco and is a rental car heading to Yosemite to tiring. I have points for hotels and the closest one to Yosemite in the one I can choose from are in Modesto. I could spend one night there go to Yosemite and then to SanFrancisco for the next 2 nights but that is a lot of Road time. Is that route scenic. We do like car rides. Any views?

I'd say unless you can stay in the park skip Yosemite. And even then, I might say skip Yosemite. Alcatraz pretty much wipes out half a day. The drive between SF and Yosemite is not very quick- a day trip would not be worth it at all to me. The last bit of road is windy and narrow. I found the trip tiring. I did 3 nights at Yosemite- if I did that drive again, I'd probably do minimum 4.


A possibility (maybe) would be to skip sequoia and substitute in Yosemite. Go to the Muir Woods as a day trip from SF (home to coastal redwoods- related to sequoias, just taller and skinnier). Mostly suggesting this because there is just so much more to Yosemite than the sequoias, and I hate recommending to anyone to skip it:)

Forgot to say- SF is worth at least 3 nights. I did 5 and still didn't get to see everything I had planned. So I don't know about must sees- but I'd divide your time equally between city and park.

>>We chose sequoia national over Yosemite since the sequoia groves in Yosemite are closed until 2017.<<

IMO (having been to YNP at least 10 times and SNP 3 times) I would definitely 100% choose Yosemite over Sequoia. And since you need to base in the SF area Yosemite makes a LOT more sense than Sequoia/Kings Canyon. Sequoia is great -- but Yosemite is absolutely iconic and one of the most famous natural wonders in the world.

>> I have points for hotels and the closest one to Yosemite in the one I can choose from are in Modesto.<<

Absolutely <B><red>HORRIBLE</B></red> idea. Modesto is an arm pit. And Modesto to Yosemite Valley is a three hour drive each way.

In your short time frame I;d do 2 nights in Yosemite (or in El Portal if you can't get into YNP), 2 nights on the coast divided between Cambria and Carmel/Monterey, and whatever time you have left - in San Francisco.

I used to live in SF (man I miss it!). There is so much to do in and around SF and you have only a few days. I would recommend making Yosemite a separate trip. The place is truly magical and requires a few days to soak it all in. Most of the drive from SF is boring and you'd lose so much of your trip in the car. If you're more interested in nature do some trips like Muir Woods, hike the Marin headlands, lots of beaches, etc. Bike riding in wine country is fun too but don't do it on the weekends when it is very congested. Skip the touristy city sites like Union and Ghiradelli Squares, the warf, etc. If you feel the need to take a cable car grab it on California street instead of the main tourist route down by Union Sq. Pacific Heights is a gorgeous neighborhood, Filmore St has cool shops and restaurants...the Presidio....so much to do!

If and only if I could get a room at the Yosemite Lodge I would use Amtrak to avoid driving all the way to Yosemite from San Francisco.
How to do it: Amtrak bus #6612 leaves Fisherman's Wharf at 6:50AM. Bus takes about 40 minutes to the Emeryville station where you transfer to the #712 San Joaquin to Merced arriving about 10:33AM. The YARTS bus leaves at 11AM (designated as Amtrak 8412). You arrive at the Yosemite Lodge about 1:25PM. The price for 2 adults one way as about $76. The YARTS bus stops at El Portal if you can only get a room there. You can pay the YARTS bus driver when you get on the bus for the ride.
I agree with janisj about Modesto. If you are on that tight a lodging budget, don't spend much time in San Francisco.

Thank you all for your replies. Would a east coast southern girl be impressed with Muir Redwoods? Our Number one reason for choosing California is the redwoods, but then after looking at the state there is so much more to awe anyone. Big Sur slowly topped my must dos. But then the fog. I saw pictures with the fog and it still looks amazing. June is the month I will be coming and I'll pray the fog lifts for part of the day we travel Hwy 1. I have 7 nights in all and was planning on sequoia for half but it is sounding like I would have a better trip planning the entire time in or near San Francisco. But still Muir? don't know much about it?

If you're going across the Golden Gate bridge anyway, go to see Muir Woods. You may find too many people for your liking but they are amazing Coast Redwoods. With only 7 days, I would not spend the time to go inland to See the Giant Sequoias in the Sierras.
There are large Coast Redwoods south of San Francisco. Check out Butano State Park and others.
By all means, see Big Sur and the town of Monterey.
Cannery Row and the Aquarium are the big attractions in Monterey.

Well, if you are driving Big Sur, that does change things. Skip Yosemite entirely. It takes more than one day to drive Big Sur. Do 3 nights on the coast in different spots, 4 nights SF, and yes, I think you'd enjoy Muir Woods. Coastal redwoods are amazing- Muir Woods are old growth redwoods that have amazingly been left not far at all from SF. Where are you flying in? If possible, consider flying into LAX and doing the trip one way- LA to SF.

There are so many amazing things in CA, but you're not accounting for driving times and you just don't have enough days for everything.

For Yosemite- SF- Coast- I think that's about 10 days, and that's pretty rushed.

Coastal redwoods - the REALLY tall ones, and Giant Sequoias - the REALLY Big/'fat' ones . . . are different species and grow in entirely different regions/climates.

Trust me, an east coast southern girl would be VERY impressed by either. But I would not bother w/ Muir Woods. There are Redwoods in Big Sur and in the Santa Cruz mountains that are nicer stands in parks that don't get a fraction the crowds of Muir Woods.

IMO/IME you do not have enough time to even consider Sequoia/Kings Canyon. If you can stretch the trip by a day or two then you <i>could</i> fit in Yosemite, Carmel/Big Sur/Coastal Redwoods, and San Francisco. But if you are limited to 7 nights I'd just do SF and Carmel/Big Sur and do some walking/hiking at Point Lobos and the two 'Pfeiffer parks' in Big Sur, and maybe squeeze in an afternoon at Big Basin.

Thank you so much I think I will change my plans to include the coastal Redwoods and San Francisco. I plan to fly into LA and out of SF. My Husband and I plan to rent a car in LA and then drive to Hearst castle spend and night nearby. The next day we plan to head up the coast. How long should I allow for the drive up Hwy 1 to Big Sur and should we stay on Hwy 1 all the way to SF? If so How long for that and where to stop for the night if needed? Can you drive from Hearst up Hwy 1 to SF in a day? Our trip is in June/fog, so is the drive doable and worthy. Pictures look amazing with or without fog.

>>My Husband and I plan to rent a car in LA and then drive to Hearst castle spend and night nearby. <<

Not after a cross country flight I hope. You'd want to break up that drive -- It is over 5 hours from LAX to San Simeon.

It sounds like you haven't booked the flights yet - right? If so, I'd fly in and out of SFO and forget LAX.

Janisj, I haven't booked the flight. And the distance vs time here is very different from there (at least that's the impression i'm getting. Isn't it closer from LAS to San Simeon? What route would you take from SF to Hearst? Would you drive Hwy 1 twice? Help, I'm out of my comfort zone on this.

Don't do the drive in one day. It's really a pull over every few miles for a view point and there's so much to see.


Sample itinerary:
I'd stay the 1st night in Santa Barbara- depending on when you fly in, I think you'll want some "just in case" time for traffic or other delays, and Santa Barbara Mission is definitely on my must see list.

Then get an early start. Stop at Hearst Castle, see the elephant seals. Drive to Big Sur- go to Pfeiffer state park. At that point it'll be night time. You don't want to drive further in the dark. Stay somewhere on big sur- I stayed at Ragged Point Inn, which may not be far enough for you, but has amazing views. Ragged Point Inn is about where the road gets really windy, and although I'm used to windy- in the fog and dark it was just too risky. Also- ragged point was my only unplanned stop for the night on the month long trip and it's one of my best memories- seeing big Sur in the early morning was just amazing.

Third night Carmel. Even if you have no interest in aquariums, the town, cypress trees and 17 mile drive are worth at least a half day. (But go to the aquarium anyway- it's very good).

Finish driving to SF. Santa Cruz boardwalk is a fun stop. Devils Slide is a good hike.

>>(at least that's the impression i'm getting. Isn't it closer from LAS to San Simeon? <<


Assuming you mean LA<B>X</B> -- no. Using 101 it is about 3.5 hours from SFO to San Simeon (and only about 3 hours to Cambria where there are good places to stay for San Simeon/Hearst Castle) . . . Then for the rest of your itinerary you could drive back north via hwy 1 through Big Sur, Carmel, Monterey and to SF.

Re marvelousmouse's itinerary - it would work . . . I'd just personally avoid the whole LAX/LA basin/southern coast looooooong haul and fly in/out of SFO

Should also say that my post is assuming hwy 1 is something you want to experience. If not- then I'd encourage you to just skip Hearst entirely. It's pretty cool- but I really don't think it's "10 hour detour" cool.

To answer your question-

Google maps says 4 h 51 minutes if you go Lax to Hearst castle. That's the coastal route. 4 and half in land. And that's not accounting for traffic or getting the rental or grabbing food or bathroom breaks. So let's say easily 7 hours from touchdown to Hearst. It could be more- no one knows with la traffic. That doesn't sound fun after a flight.

Then google say 4 hours from SFO (inland) to Hearst Castle. People moan a lot about LA traffic but I actually spent more time waiting in traffic in the Bay Area. I think it's about the same amount of time, and you'd want to go down 101 south and back up north on 1. I don't think you'd make Hearst on the first day ( I don't see how) and you really need a a full day to drive Big Sur. I think no matter if you go in one airport and out the other, or if you go in and out only SFO- the trip is still at least 2 nights however you slice it. Flying into LAX and out of SFO just gives you more time to sightsee.

Now I see what you are getting at janisj! I was thinking since they haven't been to CA they'd enjoy the whole stretch. And Santa Barbara was one of my favorite stops. But I liked the missions more than Hearst.

I don't know, if it were up to me, I'd bag it entirely for Yosemite. Big Sur is beautiful, but Hearst Castle isn't worth the 8 hour trip in my opinion. I want to return to a lot of the places, but I'd settle for just Yosemite in California.

>>Flying into LAX and out of SFO just gives you more time to sightsee.<<

I don't understand that (at all)

I avoid google maps for drive times. But yes -- there can be bad congestion in the South Bay/Silicon Valley just like in LA. SFO to Cambria is typically about 3 or 3.5 hours.

LAX to Cambria would take 4-5 hours via fast/butt ugly I-5 and about 5 hours via 101 (one should allow for traffic through the LA basin, San Fernando Valley, Oxnard/Ventura and Santa Barbara).

What I mean is: you are driving more on the coast going one way. More chances to see new stuff. If you do it round trip- half your driving time is boring. (It probably only makes sense in my head. Never mind.)

I was really lucky traffic wise before Hearst castle. North of Hearst Castle, I encountered several delays, and that's probably coloring my impressions. But if you're a tourist in a new place, you're not usually driving straight through anyway. Unless the OP has more self restraint than I do- I have no self restraint whatsoever when it comes to stopping at every interesting spot.