| Ed |
Jul 26th, 2002 05:04 AM |
Ok, call me naive - I thought with today's technology, a week or so from the estimated date would be the earliest that a baby (in a normal pregnancy) could be born. Further, I've heard stories where women would be in labor for hours and hours (enough time to drive home) before they had to get to the hospital. If those beliefs are incorrect, I'm to blame. <BR><BR>We waited so long because once we found out we were having a baby, we were busy for two months looking for a house and after we closed, it seemed like a problem (some major) was cropping up every week and we were interviewing contractors for nine different services throughout the past four months. In addition, we had to take off to meet the contractor at the house, to review their work, etc., etc. (I'm sure those with house issues know what I'm talking about).<BR><BR>Anyway, thanks for the great ideas. I may still use them if we are able to take a short vacation the beginning of next week (so it would be more than a month away). If it did come down to anything within four weeks, I will be in the Plaza in NYC. The Sagamore (Lake George), the Inn and Perry Cabin and the Basin Harbor Resort all look fantastic and if we can't go this time, I'm sure to visit somewhere down the road. The Canyon Ranch Health Spa was just way too expensive (i.e., around $4k for three days).<BR><BR>Thanks for all your feedback.
|