Fodor's Travel Talk Forums

Fodor's Travel Talk Forums (https://www.fodors.com/community/)
-   Europe (https://www.fodors.com/community/europe/)
-   -   Please comment on my itenerary (https://www.fodors.com/community/europe/please-comment-on-my-itenerary-44844/)

Amanda May 20th, 1999 04:09 PM

Please comment on my itenerary
 
I've noticed such great help with the comments given to iteneraries, that I thought I'd put mine up. As this is our (I'm going with my boyfriend) first time in Europe, we're not sure what sort of sights take long and which ones don't. <BR> <BR>Comments will be much appreciated. Here goes.. <BR> <BR>Paris (2.5 days) <BR>0.5 Day - Arc De triumph, Eiffel Tower, Notre Dame <BR>Day 2 - Louvre, Latin Quarter, Orsay Museum <BR>Day 3 - Versailles <BR> <BR>Bruge (1 day - one the way from Paris to Amsterdam, not staying the night) <BR>Basilica of the holy blood, groenich museum, chocolate shops, windmills <BR> <BR>Amsterday (2 days) <BR>Day 1 - Ann Frank House, Rijks Museum <BR>Day 2 - Marijuana Museum, Van Gogh Museum <BR> <BR>Cologne (1 day) <BR>DOM Cathedral, museums, bridge, chocolate museum <BR> <BR>Rhine Cruise (1 day) <BR>Depart from Cologne early morning, taking train to Koblenz and then cruising down to Bacharac. Spending night at Bacharac. <BR> <BR>Berlin (3 days) <BR>Day 1 - Museumsinsel, Potsdamer Platz <BR>Day 2 - Kulturforum, national gallery, german historical museum <BR>Day 3 - Gemaldegalerie (1/2 day) <BR> <BR>Prague (3 days) <BR>Day 1 - Churches/Museums Hradcany, Staramesto <BR>Day 2 - Prague Castle and surroundings <BR>Day 3 - Wolenstein Palace (malastrana) <BR>Possibility of Going to a crystal factory and Mucha <BR> <BR>Vienna (2 days) <BR>Day 1 - Schloss Schonbrunn, Kurshistoriches museum <BR>Day 2 - Ringstrasse tour (bus tour from Rick Steve's book) St.Stephens Cathedral, Coffee houses and wind houses on kartner strasse <BR>Hoffberg Palace <BR>Possible mozart concert at night <BR> <BR>Salzburg (2 days) <BR>Day 1 - Day trip to Halstatt <BR>Day 2 - Festung Hohensalsburg (fortress), mozart walking tour <BR> <BR>Munich (3 days) <BR>Day 1- Deutch Museum and general city sights <BR>Day 2 - Neucweinstien and other castles (not sure of spelling) <BR>Day 3 - Dachau <BR> <BR>Zurich (0.5 days) <BR>Quick sightsee while changing trains from munich-lucerne <BR>Courtyards, Fountains, Barnhoff Strass, Lindt&sprugi Chocolate factories <BR> <BR>Lucerne (1 day) <BR>Glacier grande, kapelbruck and spreuerbruck bridges, scenic cuirse on lake lucerne and possibly going via cog railways to have dinner on the moutnains. <BR> <BR>Lauterbrunnen (3 days) <BR>Day 1 - Jungfrau <BR>Day 2 - Schilthorn <BR>Day 3 - Boat trip on either lake thun or brienz. Trummmelbach falls <BR> <BR>Montreaux (1 day) <BR>Chateau de Chillon <BR> <BR>Venice (3 days) <BR>Day 1 - Grand Canal Tour (from rick steve), St. Marks Square, glassblowing, St. Mark's bascilica. <BR>Day 2 - Doge's Palace, Galleria dell' Academia. Possible Vivaldi concert at night. <BR>Day 3 - Peggy guggenheim collection, Cheisa dei Frani <BR> <BR>Florence (4 days) <BR>Day 1 - Renaissance Walk (from Rich steve's book), Baptistry, Bargello <BR>day 2 - Uffize <BR>Day 3 - Pitti Palace <BR>Day 4 - Science Museum, Accademia Gallery <BR> <BR>Sienna (1 day) <BR>visit Pisa on the way to Sienna <BR>Il Campo, The Duomo <BR> <BR>Naples (2 days) <BR>Day 1 - Baia <BR>Day 2 - Pompeii <BR> <BR>Rome (3 days) <BR>Day 1 - Colloseum and Roman Forum. Floodlit walk as per Rick Steve's book <BR>Day 2 - Vatican and surroundings. Dolce Vita Stroll (walk as per RS) <BR>Day 3 - Pantheon & Central Rome. Capuccin Crypt. <BR> <BR>----- <BR> <BR>The trip is 6.5 weeks.. and that's what we've come up with. Please comment esp. on the duration which we've set aside. <BR> <BR>Thanks heaps. <BR> <BR>Amanda. <BR> <BR>

wes fowler May 20th, 1999 05:36 PM

Amanda, <BR>My initial reaction was to hope that you had set aside 8 to 10 days in Luzerne because you'll need a hospital stay of that duration to recover from total exhaustion! I realize you're young and being Australian a far piece down the road from Europe. Don't think of this trip as a once in a life time experience. It took Hitler, Napoleon and the Caesars years to cover as much ground as you envision. Scale this trip down on the premise that you'll do it again and catch what you missed this trip. There are a number of things you should take in to consideration. For example: with only two and a half days in Paris it's uneconomical to pay 60 Australian dollars for a museum pass. Have you considered the time you'll lose standing in line at the Louvre, or Florence's Uffizi? Are train schedules going to allow you enough time for a full day in Brugges or simply time to visit its train station for lunch? Your query will prompt a lot of responses I'm sure and I'm equally sure each will tell you that your itinerary is too ambitious and cheats yourself of the opportunity to really indulge in the delights of Paris or Florence or Vienna or wherever. Pare it down and plan to come back again!

Donna May 20th, 1999 05:44 PM

Gosh, are you organized! I would recommend modifying Paris as follows: on the first day start at the rooftop of La Samaritaine for a glorious panoramic view of the city, then the Louvre, then Place de la Concorde, then Arc de Triomphe. A ride to the top of the Tour Eiffel is best at dusk when the light is the most beautiful, staying until after dark when the lights are turned on all over the city. I would recommend a boat ride on the Seine either before or after going to the Tour Eiffel (glorious late afternoon or after dark). On the second day, you may want to start at Musee Rodin (not to be missed in my opinion - the gardens, mansion, and scupltures are outstanding), perhaps preceded by a visit to Napoleon's Tomb at the Eglise du Dome, then the Musee d'Orsay, then St. Chapelle (have you been to Notre Dame previously - for most folks this is a must see), then to the Latin Quarter. Actually, I would recommend winding up the day in the St. Germaine area, rather than the Latin Quarter for an excellent dinner and terrific nightlife. As for Lucerne, don't miss the Lion Monument. In Zurich, you can walk Banhoffstrauss in 20 minutes (unless you plan to do some serious shopping, which I would discourage since virtually everything can be purchased for substantially less elsewhere), and the old section of the city is wonderful. Full of fabulous restaurants and gorgeous buildings. A walk to the lake is nice. This is quite the ambitious itinerary and I congratulate you on your planning!

Amanda May 20th, 1999 07:41 PM

Thanks for your comments Wes and Donna. <BR> <BR>By getting the museum pass, won't you be avoiding the queues at museums in Paris? Or did you mean queues to actually enter the museums? <BR> <BR>We did check out the train timetables - the above itenary does take that into account. We get to Bruges around 10am and leave there to go to Amsterdam around 6pm. :) <BR> <BR>I am aware that it does have a fair amount of travelling. We thought that for this trip we'll have a sample of what is there.. enough to know where to return to. <BR> <BR>Is it really that rushed though? <BR> <BR>We did originally set aside a whole day for the Louvre as we have for Uffizi. <BR> <BR>*confused* <BR>

martha May 21st, 1999 05:45 AM

Anyone whose itinerary includes chocolate is thinking along the right lines, I'd say. <BR>I think one of the big advantages of the musuem pass is that it allows you to see the Louvre in three-hour chunks over several days, rather than entering the equivalent of Biosphere II for an entire day. <BR>I hate to sound pedestrian, but it seems to me that at some point you're going to need to do a load of laundry and might also want to spend a day cafe-sitting, writing postcards, etc. Where does that fit in? <BR>Also, while your schedule accommodates train schedules, what about museum closings? Have you plotted this out on a calendar to see where they fall? What about national holidays? <BR>If your goal is getting a general feeling for Europe, I'd suggest bagging some of the smaller towns for which you've planned one-day stays. Add the time to the major cities, from which you can plan day trips if you feel so inclined, lesser sights of the big cities if something interests you, laundry if you need it, or soup and a nap if you get sick (one of the big hazards of high-speed travel, in my experience).

Kimberley May 21st, 1999 06:12 AM

<BR>Amanda- <BR>You certainly hit on a lot of good sights, but you are definitely too rushed. Not so much because you didn't allow enough time for each thing, but because you didn't factor in mental exhaustion and time to absorb what you've seen. For example, you just might not have room in your mind to register anything you see at the D'Orsay after spending all morning at the Louvre. Some of these things take some time to sink in, and you will soon find that you're not appreciating any of the sights if you are concentrating more on where you're going next than on just absorbing where you are at that moment. I hope your trip is fantastic for you! Enjoy it...

dAWN May 21st, 1999 06:44 AM

WHOA, And I thought my husband and I planned alot. I do agree with some of the posters in that, with the itinerary you've designed, places will start to run together. When you see some of these sights, it can be quite moving. You will not be able to appreciate these places, sights, etc. at your rate of speed. After a while, they will all run together, and although you will be able to say you were there, you will not be able to apprecaite the beauty and the experience at this rate. To start you will need more time in Paris. We waited 3 hours in line for the Eiffel Tour. The Eiffel and Notre Dame will take one day, maybe with an hour at a side walk cafe. Louvre and Orsay in one day, I say impossible. Versailles in one day is fine. I will only comment on the areas I know about. Venice and Florence are about right, but you have not figured in any down time. Also, something to consider, rain, late trains, train strikes, museum closings, etc. Honestly, I done this and it was not fun. Missed many things, and never relaxed. The only way to see it all is to condense and make plans to go back. I would start by concentrating on less countries. What are your favorite places?

lynn May 21st, 1999 06:45 AM

Hi Amanda - <BR> <BR>Let me preface my comments by saying you're a woman after my own heart. I usually like fitting in lots of sites too but yours, I think, is even too much for me. <BR> <BR>1st, two major museums in one day is just not good IMO. The Louvre is a daunting task in its own right. Unless you are a major museum hoping fan (and you might be, I don't know) you will have had your fill for the day at the Louvre. <BR> <BR>Also, only 2.5 days in Paris? Are you crazy? I've taken two trips to Paris for 6 days each and I'm still making lists about what I want to see next time we go. PLEASE allow at least 4-5 days for Paris. I don't think you'll regret it. What about the Catacombs, St. Chapelle, Rodin Museum, etc. and just wandering around for no good reason? You will miss much if you only stay 2.5 days. <BR> <BR>I would stay over night in Brugges. I haven't been but from what I've read on this forum, it's really neat and requires more than 8 hours. <BR> <BR>As for other locations, I would recommend, as I have seen other posters recommend in the past, to stay in one strategic location for 6-7 days and then do day trips from there. You will be amazed at what a pain in the butt packing and repacking is. <BR> <BR>Which leads me to luggage. I hope you're only planning on one bag each and perhaps a tote. Believe me, you don't want to be running around with luggage in tow. Also, it's terrible trying to get around on the Metro with all the stairs and whatnot with luggage. <BR> <BR>Good luck with whatever you plan! <BR> <BR>:-) <BR>

gina May 21st, 1999 08:00 AM

Amanda--a few thoughts. First, I have twice done a whirlwind tour like yours and while hectic, I wouldn't have traded it for ld. You need to take into account your age, health and tude. While everyone says you have to figure you will return, you also have to figure how much it's costing you to go, so you might as well do as much as you can. I think you are going a little heavy on the Rick Steves. While his suggestions for seeing the sights are usually right on, his suggestions for lodging were, in my family's opinion, a little too bottom-of-the barrel. So many European hotels are noisy because of traffic, so you have to figure on little sleep. Almost every hotel he recommended that we chose had uncomfortable mattresses and no air conditioning. That was very hard on my husband who doesn't sleep well away from home, so he turned into a grouch and got sick. Also, I can't for the life of me understand what Rick Steves sees in Bacharach. There is absolutely nothing there. And, it is impossible to sleep because of the trains that go right under the hotels' windows. Go on to Heidelberg. Don't stay in Bacharach. In Salzburg you will find several laundries that will wash your clothes so you can see the sights or just rest and enjoy. I say go for it. Eat well. Give each other space. Keep a journal. Buy earplugs. Spend a little extra on a quieter hotel if you can. Have a great trip. <BR>

Peter May 21st, 1999 09:37 AM

Versailles? skip it if you only have 2.5 days in Paris - really not worth a trip - spend more time in Paris!!! <BR>Versailles...maybe on sunday when they have the fountain "show" which is really no big deal.

wes fowler May 21st, 1999 11:52 AM

Amanda, <BR>It's me again with some more thoughts. Firstly, I'm surprised that there haven't been more respondents to date strongly suggesting that you curtail your itinerary. A second thought crossed my mind. Obviously, you've planned for the sights you wish to see most meticulously. Have you done the same for accommodation reservations? Will you be staying in hostels or hotels? If the latter, have or will you make reservations in advance so that you aren't losing precious time hunting for a bed at night? What happens if you've reserved in a town or city and your schedule goes askew? Will credit card deposits or other deposits and reservations be lost? Now, for some analogies. Think of yourself in a fine restaurant presented with a menu; a menu comprised of all the sights you wish to see in Europe. You tell the waiter you'll have a sample of each item on the menu. What will you accomplish, besides throwing the kitchen staff into turmoil? Assuredly you'll desensitize your palate and be bloated by taste after taste that by their sheer number leave no pleasant, meaningful, lasting memories of the individual dishes that comprised the meal. Take another analogy. Same restaurant but now the menu is comprised of page after page of all the wonders of Paris. You order the Louvre and the Tour Eiffel. Can you say you've experienced Paris? Do two museums, an arch and a tower comprise Paris? <BR>I think not. What of the leisurely stroll through the Jardin du Luxembourg, the stained glass windows of Ste. Chapelle, the hours idly spent in a sidewalk café? What of the street entertainers on Pl. Georges Pompideau or the restful silence of the Place de Vosges? Miss these and so many other experiences like them and you miss Paris. So, too, with Amsterdam, Berlin, Florence, Prague and many other places on your itinerary. <BR>

wes fowler May 21st, 1999 11:52 AM

Amanda, <BR>It's me again with some more thoughts. Firstly, I'm surprised that there haven't been more respondents to date strongly suggesting that you curtail your itinerary. A second thought crossed my mind. Obviously, you've planned for the sights you wish to see most meticulously. Have you done the same for accommodation reservations? Will you be staying in hostels or hotels? If the latter, have or will you make reservations in advance so that you aren't losing precious time hunting for a bed at night? What happens if you've reserved in a town or city and your schedule goes askew? Will credit card deposits or other deposits and reservations be lost? Now, for some analogies. Think of yourself in a fine restaurant presented with a menu; a menu comprised of all the sights you wish to see in Europe. You tell the waiter you'll have a sample of each item on the menu. What will you accomplish, besides throwing the kitchen staff into turmoil? Assuredly you'll desensitize your palate and be bloated by taste after taste that by their sheer number leave no pleasant, meaningful, lasting memories of the individual dishes that comprised the meal. Take another analogy. Same restaurant but now the menu is comprised of page after page of all the wonders of Paris. You order the Louvre and the Tour Eiffel. Can you say you've experienced Paris? Do two museums, an arch and a tower comprise Paris? <BR>I think not. What of the leisurely stroll through the Jardin du Luxembourg, the stained glass windows of Ste. Chapelle, the hours idly spent in a sidewalk café? What of the street entertainers on Pl. Georges Pompideau or the restful silence of the Place de Vosges? Miss these and so many other experiences like them and you miss Paris. So, too, with Amsterdam, Berlin, Florence, Prague and many other places on your itinerary. <BR>

Bob May 21st, 1999 11:53 AM

WOW! I am already tired just reading that schedule! If it's Tuesday..... My recommendation concurs with above. Bacharach on the Rhine is a short trip and not an overnight destination. Heidelberg much better. Overall, I too would eliminate a few things, slow down and enjoy what you see. My wife and I still talk about the couple we ran into on a cable car ride when we lived in Germany. They were on a "See all of Europe" tour. I asked them where they had been and they disagreed on where they had been the day before. They were not really sure of the last week and the wife could not remember one of the stops the husband was telling us about. Take a video and talk into it so you can remember when you arrive home exhausted and needing a vacation. WOW!

Beth May 21st, 1999 11:59 AM

Hi Amanda, <BR> <BR>I'd like to offer the same suggestion I've made before to anyone spending more than 3 or 4 weeks in Europe. I think its great to pick someplace to settle for an entire week and take daytrips from. It gives you a chance to relax, and to really immerse yourself in the European lifestyle more. If it were me I would pick the countryside in either France or Italy. Maybe rent a villa in Tuscany for a week. Or a villa in Provence. If cities are really more your speed than stay a whole week in Florence or Paris, where you rent an apartment and go to the market and buy food and such. It almost forces you to slow down and enjoy. Not to mention doing laundry, and sleeping late, and NOT going to museums. Maybe go to the beach somewhere and spend an entire day NOT sightseeing. I know I couldn't keep up the pace you've set.

Walter May 21st, 1999 12:38 PM

Amanda- I think you can rearrange/eliminate some things on your Italy leg (slight pun-boot:). Venice: Is the RS's Grand Canal Tour, a canal trip on the water-bus? If so I wouldn't plan it just do it when the opportunity/time arises. I would combine St. Mark's Sq., Bascilla, and the Doge's Palace (same area/same day). Glassblowing (Murano?) If so why not do the Accademia in the AM and go to the island for lunch and the glassblowing (haven't been there). Florence: I'd skip the Renaissance walk (to save time), and see these sights in bits and pieces while walking between sites the next 4 days. Don't let the maps deceive you all the major sites are within 800m of the Duomo (Pitti P. ~1500m). With reservations I'd give the Uffizi 1/2 day and with reservations the Accademia an hr and just see Michelangelo's "David" and "The four Slaves/Prisoners". I would combine the Science Museum and Pitti Palace walking via the Ponte Vecchio. Rome: Depending on the queues/crowds I would combine Colosseum, Roman Forum, Palatine, Pantheon, and end your long day at Piazza Navona. The Capuccin Crypt is easy to visit it's within 100m of the Barberini metro stop. Naples: It makes for a long day but you can visit both Herculaneum and Pompeii in 1 day. In closing I must add that my visits to Italy where off-season (feb) so bear in mind I wasn't dealing with long queues and crowds but I still think you can combine some of the sights. HTH Regards, Walter p.s. More time in Paris:) <BR>

lisa May 21st, 1999 12:56 PM

Amanda -- Yes, you do have a lot on your itinerary -- but at least you've gone to the trouble of figuring out the 3 or 4 things in each place that you want to see. If you're going to spend so little time in each place, that's the way to do it: you have to prioritize. I haven't been to all the places listed but I've been to some so I will share what I can: <BR>1. Paris. Yes, you need 5 days to see Paris. If you only have 2.5 days, you may even want to skip the Louvre because there is just WAY too much there -- or at least limit yourself to one of the museum's short tours (around 2 hours I think) that will give you an introduction to their collection without overwhelming you too much. As someone else pointed out, just getting there can take a while and then you still have to stand in line, etc. It takes longer than you'd think. Whatever you do, don't do that thing people do where they run in, scramble to find the Mona Lisa, squint at it from across the room because they can't get anywhere near it because there are too many people in the room, and then leave -- argh. Of the things on your list, the Musee d'Orsay was my favorite. Versailles is spectacular; at least you set aside a whole day for it. My favorite museum in Paris is the Picasso museum in the Marais. The Arc de Triomphe is no great shakes in my opinion; go see Sacre Coeur/Montmartre instead! But please, please, please, think about eliminating a couple of your other destinations and adding 2-3 days on to your time in Paris. <BR>2. Amsterdam. I think what you have planned sounds about perfect for the amount of time you're there. My favorites were the Anne Frank House and the Van Gogh museum, which was fantastic. Frankly, the Rijksmuseum is overwhelming in the same way the Louvre is (only less so) -- there's just too much there and unless you have a ton of time I'm not sure I'd even bother; your time might be better spent sitting at a cafe and soaking up the atmosphere of the city and peoplewatching. <BR>3. Rhine cruise -- this will be great -- make sure you have lots of film. <BR>4. Venice, Florence, & Rome -- Considering the amount of time you have to spend overall, I think you've allotted just enough time here (or almost, anyway) and have a pretty good plan. <BR>5. In general: I really think it's better to spend at LEAST 2 nights/3 days in each place you plan to stop (3 nights is better). Otherwise you can't even appreciate what you're seeing. I would recommend that you eliminate at least 2 or 3 destinations and add that time to some of the others (especially Paris). I know this is hard to imagine, but it's actually not even fun to go to one of the nicest cities in the world for only 1 day, especially after you've already been travelling for weeks on end. By the end of the six weeks, it starts to feel more like an obligation than anything that you actually want to do. Better to add those one-day segments on somewhere else (Paris!). <BR>Good luck and have a great trip.

Amanda May 23rd, 1999 02:47 PM

Hi everyone <BR> <BR>Thank you thank you thank you soo much. <BR> <BR>One thing which came up was that more time is needed in Paris. I had a chat with my boyfriend last night, and we both sat down and had a talked about what we really watned to do in Paris. <BR> <BR>Paris was the last place we added on the list because my boyfriend insisted that he wants to go to the Louvre. I didn't think it was worth it going all the way there just for a day in the Louve, so we added another day and the day we land in PAris. (2.5 days, we land around 6am). We will definitely go back to Paris. On this trip we haven't added France and Spain as such. We will go back to do these.. so we've finally figured out taht while in PAris, we will not rush to see all the sights, but to firstly concentrate on the Louvre and Versailles. The rest of the stuff, we'll fit in around it. <BR> <BR>Does that sound reasonable? I know we're not going to experience Paris - but we will be returning and at least we will know then to set aside a week or so for it. <BR> <BR>For the rest of the trip, we've decided that we'll go through our list again, and prioritize what we want to see. And if we don't make the rest, we will return one day. <BR> <BR>Please don't get me (us) wrong. We have no intentions of rushing through at headlong speed (though the itenerary might give a different impression). It's our first time and we have no idea how long things take and how big the various places are. Advice obtain from this posts ahve been invaluable. <BR> <BR>We have taken into consideration the closing times for the various museums and have checked the trains. I will go through my maps to figure out wher Heidelberg is. One plus I felt about Bacharac is that the youth hostel used ot be a castle.. I'd love to spend a night in a castle and I can't really afford the other ones. <BR> <BR>From the above posts, it seems that time allocated for most other things is about right(?) and it's just Paris that was rushed?? <BR> <BR>I do thank you all for your help. And as we reshape our itenerary, will keep referring to posts.

Paulo May 24th, 1999 10:21 AM

Regarding your plan to visit Italy, though it's quite well balanced, I think you'll regret not having an extra day in Rome. If you're able to cut a day (or a city) from your itinerary before getting to Venice, I would add it to the Rome stay. This would enable you to visit the Museo Borghese and Tivoli, if you wish. I agree with Walter on whgat regards changes on your city visiting plans. I'll save my comments for later, when you've established the number of days in each. Right now I want to comment only on Naples. Here I don't agree with Walter 100%. Although a visit to both, Pompei and Ercolano may be fit in a single day, I think this is a mistake ... IMO, nobody should visit both and miss the Archaelogical Museum in Naples. I would visit the Museum first and then go about visiting Pompei, returning in the evening. You won't have time fitting all three in a single day. Also to consider, in Naples, is the Capodimonte Museu ... Most probably, considering you'll have visited quite a number of museums before you get there, it's ok giving priority to a boat trip in the bay. <BR>Paulo <BR> <BR>

Amanda May 25th, 1999 02:45 PM

I keep reading and re-reading posts and though it puts things in a jumble, I'm so glad to have several experienced opinions. <BR> <BR>A few more questions have have been raised.. <BR> <BR>Is it worth stopping in Montreaux for Chateau Chillon? <BR> <BR>Someone's just told me that you'll only spend 2 hours there.. if that's the case we probably might either skip it or get off the train so ahve a look at it and resume our journey on that day itself, instead of spending the night in Montreaux. <BR> <BR>Another question we found ourselves asking is.. would it be worth it to spend the night in Bruges? We're hoping to do most of our travelling at night or late evening, so taht's why we figured, we'd take the train to Amsterdam and spend the night there. We would also get one less travel day on euro. But what goes on in Bruges after dark? If it's a small town, won't it go to sleep? <BR> <BR>Please comment. <BR> <BR>Thanks.

Mary May 25th, 1999 02:54 PM

Montreaux is a beautiful city to visit and the Chateau does only take about two hours to visit. I would see Heidleberg, instead.

Amanda May 25th, 1999 03:08 PM

I must admit that Heidelberg is quite out of the way for us. <BR> <BR>We end our rhine cruise in bacharac and the next day, we're taking the train from bacharac to Berlin. <BR> <BR>I doubt we can add anymore travel time. I'm sure we'll return though and will put heidelberg as one of our must-see list for the 2nd round. <BR> <BR>It helps so much when you start thinking that you will return. :)

Bob Brown May 25th, 1999 04:16 PM

After reading the initial schedule, I was struck by the similarity of that trip plan and the ones my father used to make. His modus operandi was something like this: <BR>Ok, an hour is enough for the Grand Canyon, you can look at the pictures when we get home. We have to get to Yosemite before dark. The problem was that he did not have a camera. <BR> <BR>If you are in real good shape, and can run to all of the places along the way, <BR>or take taxis, and see no more than two attactions in the Louvre I think you might be able to get in Moscow on this trip, too. <BR> <BR>Seriously, do you measure the success of your trips in miles traveled per day and the number of attractions seen out of a car window?? If so, hang in there. You might not remember what you saw, but you will have seen it!! <BR>

Mary Ann May 25th, 1999 04:22 PM

Amanda: It sounds like you travel like us with 2 and 3 night stays. We were last there in 1997 and our daughter stayed at the Hostel in Bacharach and loved it. It is a hike up the hill and it fills up fast, but they got the last room which was like a double and the view was fantastic. We also use Rick Steves for alot of our walking tours and reservations. Yes, as mentioned above some of his recommendations may be in noisy areas, but he usually lets you know this and it is your choice if you want to pick a quieter recommendation, which we are doing for our trip this fall. If you spend the night in Brugge, consider one of the Beer pubs, it was amazing that they had all the different glasses for the different beers. In Amsterdam, if you want a diversion, try the Heineken brewery tour, within walking distance of the Riks museum. You can buy tickets ahead of time (it was like $2 a person (US)). It sounds like a fantastic trip, fast paced but you seem to have cafes, etc. built in. In Amsterdam a canal cruise is also nice, it covers a lot of ground and you learn about the Architecture and the lay out of the city. We did Ricks suggestion and had breakfast at the Schilthorn and it was truly a memorable day. Have a great trip.

Deb May 25th, 1999 04:28 PM

Amanda, <BR> <BR>I have travelled to Europe many times. However, on my first trip at 18, I did a trip such as yours, commonly called, "If It's Tuesday, It Must be Belgium." I don't regret it a bit! I saw a lot of things; those I did and didn't like. <BR> <BR>Now on subsequent trips I make the point to concentrate on one particular area or country. I personally feel an "overview" trip is great for the first time. <BR> <BR>Enjoy--you've picked some wonderful places. Personally since you are going to Schloss Schonbrunn, I would skip Versailles. Schonbrunn is full of period furniture and every bit as nice as Versailles which has relatively no furniture. <BR> <BR>Also make sure you get your tickets online for Uffizi before you go--then you don't have to wait in line for 2 hours before you get in (believe me, I'm telling you from personal experience). <BR> <BR>Deb

April May 25th, 1999 09:31 PM

Re: Amsterdam. There's a lot to read here so I'm assuming that nobody has mentioned this: I would take the Rijksmuseum and the Van Gogh in on the same day since they're close to one another. If the Rijksmuseum is overwhelming I think it's due to the number of same-style paintings. Most aren't my cup of tea, but they might be yours. You might as well see the famous Night Watch while you're there. Some surprises can be found though, like a lovely little painting by the gift shop called Morning Ride on the Beach by Anton Mauve. The building itself is rather grand (unlike the Van Gogh museum). I hope the Van Goghs are back by the time you go, although there are other great works by other artists. Out of the two museums I would spend most of my time there. Afterwards if you want a break from being inside, take a wander through Vondelpark. <BR>

martha May 26th, 1999 04:23 AM

Re Brugge at night: The Belgians (or at least the ines in Brugge) are real nightowls. We usually started dinner at 9 or so. By the time we finished, it was often after midnight. We aren't nightclubbers, so I don't know if anything was happening after that, but by then I was ready for bed. <BR>

Amanda May 26th, 1999 04:49 PM

Hi everyone, <BR> <BR>April, thanks for your posts for Amsterdam. It does seem like one whole day for the Rijks Museum is sufficient for a first visit. Would I need to pre-book tickets there? <BR> <BR>By prebooking tickets, do you pick them up at the door of the museum or does the museum send the tickets to you? <BR> <BR>Would I need to book for the Accademia as well? <BR> <BR>Oh, another question - has anyone stayed at Hotel Leveque? On the map it looks really close to the Eifel tower and notre dame. <BR> <BR>

Donna May 26th, 1999 05:49 PM

I think you are absolutely SMART to lay out the itinerary and get the feedback you are getting. I was tired after I got past your Paris itinerary in 2.5 days. I'm gonna be one of those who say: try a week in Paris and just stroll around a little bit every day. <BR> <BR>Just a couple of major questions: How many bags will you be schlepping? Better be some ONE THING on wheels and a backpack. If either one of you takes any more than that, you will be separating about two weeks into the trip. <BR> <BR>Second question: Have you taken JET LAG into consideration? How long is your flight? Mine is from Chicago. When we get to Paris, we immediately take a 3 hour nap, then get up and roam around, have an evening meal, some night life, then to bed at a reasonable hour. <BR> <BR>Do one major thing each day, then stroll, stop at sidewalk cafes, etc. Perhaps in the Louvre you can just go to the most famous sights, but when you go back next time, you'll have to take at least a half day for exploring. I found my most favorite paintings by just exploring. Take a day trip to Giverny or go to Chartres if you can. <BR> <BR>I'll also comment that your day in Brugges will be a fine one. You can walk into the town from the train and see everything you want, but still take the time to stroll around.Do not miss the two major plazas there: Market Square and then the other square just next to it. There is a Michelangelo in the cathedral, but there are only CERTAIN hours you can go in to see it. We've missed it both times, darn it, just keep forgetting about the times. Then go across the park to the Michelangelo restaurant for cappucino and chocolate. The Belgians know how to serve chocolate! <BR> <BR>Venice? not nearly enough time on your schedule. From the train to St. Mark's Square, where I hope you'll be staying in a 4 star hotel, you can see a lot of the canal on your water taxi ride. <BR>Spring for the cost, skip the vaporetto. You'll save time and you won't be jostled by the crowds. <BR> <BR>Go VERY EARLY to the Basilica and DO NOT MISS going up the very steep steps to the second story, see the original horses that are inside, then go outside where the fake horses are and walk around and see Venice from above . . . you will want a panoramic camera. <BR>You will want to be strolling around after that to shop, and you'll want to go walking over the Rialto, all around that area. <BR> <BR>You want to go to the Doges the next day, then walk around Venice some more. It is magical. There is nothing else in the world like it. And you will return. <BR> <BR>I've found in my travelling that I need some time to rest about every four days of hard traveling/sightseeing. It's like I need a weekend or some time off. If you can build into the itinerary that down time that some of the other contributors mentioned, you'll be able to recharge. <BR> <BR>Only one other comment: Bavaria and the castles are worth much more time than you have on the list. Neuschwanstein will be at least a half day. Then you'll want to see Linderhof, then up to Weis church. You need a couple of days there. <BR> <BR>Just one final query: could you add Rothenburg to your list in Germany. It is a beautiful medieval untouched walled city. You need an overnight there. <BR> <BR>Okay! Don't go crazy over this. <BR> <BR>

Amanda May 26th, 1999 06:12 PM

Donna - we're spending one whole day going to nachweinstein and the two other castles. Is taht still not sufficient? <BR> <BR>With regards to Paris, it's actually the last destination we added on our itenerary - cause my boyfriend had to see the Louvre. We've allocated a whole day there and the next whole day - which is a Sunday, will be at Versailles. There rest of the sites will have to wait when we return. <BR> <BR>We're spending all day on the cruise from Koblenz to Bacharac and will be spending 2 hours at the rheinfels castle in St. Goar. I guess that's not really enough time is it? I absolutely love castles... but I am a little concern that I will be dragging my boyfriend along, if we do add anymore. This is the first time either of us is going to Europe and the first time travelling together. :) <BR> <BR>Oh, as to luggage, we'll both be having our very own backpacks/travelpacks. :) So we'll be travelling light. <BR> <BR>:)

Dayle May 26th, 1999 06:47 PM

Amanda, my experience is limited to a 2 week trip to Italy and another 2 weeks in France. I would just make a couple comments: personally, I would cut the number of destinations and give myself a good mix of cities and countryside/small villages. Also, If you stick to your ambitious itinerary, stay flexible. Allow time for the unexpected, both good and bad. A strike or really bad weather might mean going on to the next city or sight. You may pass by a place that looks interesting and regret it later if you feel you HAVE to get somewhere else. Lucky you to have 6 weeks. Have a great time!

April May 26th, 1999 07:00 PM

Re: Rijksmuseum. 2 or 3 hours there was enough for me. I don't know if they have pre-booked tickets - we just showed up. If there's a crowd at the front entrance, there may also be a door at the back. I would go to the art museums as early in the day as possible, and the same for the Ann Frank house. A canal cruise is a quick way to orient yourself to the city. <BR>

Donna May 27th, 1999 07:43 AM

Amanda, about the Bavarian castles. A full day seeing the castles would work if you have no lines and no tour buses and no masses of foreign tourists pouring out just in line in front of you. What about just spending the night in Fussen and breaking it up a bit . . . <BR> <BR>I love the castles, too. I always enter with the belief that I could move in and live there. Servants and all. I never get enough looking-around time there. The only exception was Leap Castle, the most haunted castle in Ireland. <BR> <BR>Did you say you've never traveled with this boyfriend before? At the risk of getting slaughtered, may I just ask if you are students? career-minded lucky people to get 6 weeks off? and would there be an endless supply of money? (don't kill me, I'm a financial planner, asking these questions to help my clients reach their goals is just a part of it) <BR> <BR>Have a great time, anyway! Roll with it, good luck! Donna

Andrew May 27th, 1999 09:05 AM

Amanda, I too think your itinery is very challenging. You need to answer the question "why am I going to Europe". If its for the 'classical' architecture and art, then you've got the right sights; if its to see how people live (vastly different from Aust/NZ/UK/USA), then you have the wrong itinery. <BR> <BR>You have to seriously appreciate classical art to get value from the Louvre, Rijksmuseum, Accademia, etc - these are all great; but in my opinion you definitely need to view them in the context of a relaxed view of local life. If you rush rush rush you are not doing adequate service to the art. <BR> <BR>I've been to Paris 6-7 times; I've probably spent 40-50 days there; and it is a fabulous fabulous major city. Fantastic cafes which you must visit; great markets (as in all of France); but its the lifestyle of the Parisians that make it great; the sights, though awesome, are secondary. I'd forget the Louvre (unless you're a serious classicist); but the D'orsay, Picasso, Rodin are all great. <BR> <BR>I was vaguely disappointed with Versaille; spend that day in Paris; or what about Chartre? Very famous and interesting cathedral in a nice old town. <BR> <BR>I would go for Heidelburg; the old section is one of the few major cities not flattened suring the war. Also the largest beer-barrel in the world! <BR> <BR>Too little time in Berlin, but once again I'd just hang out and watch people live. Excellent clubs etc after dark. I need to go back because I haven't been since before the wall came down. <BR> <BR>You can't go wrong in Italy; but I guarantee you won't get your itinery done. I'd stay longer in Rome and forget Naples (though it IS worth seeing); but Rome is just a lot better. <BR> <BR>Amanda; I've done everything you've done, but it took me six months (multiple journeys); and I still feel like I worked too hard at it. But I do feel like I know how the Europeans live; and that is more important to me. <BR> <BR>Can't you move to UK on a Working Holiday (under 26) thing? <BR> <BR>Good luck.

Amanda May 27th, 1999 02:31 PM

Wow... great comments people. Thank you sooo much. <BR> <BR>That's a good question - why am I going to Europe? Hmmm... to see some great art, historical stuff - includes historical science. Experience the food. I know we won't have time for the culture - unfortunately, not this trip. I fully agree, that we would need to relax and absorb the atmosphere and its people to do that. <BR> <BR>After reading various posts, I reallize taht we have fallen into the first-time-europe trap, which is to see as much as possible. <BR> <BR>But we are flexible. If we find we're not absorbing as much as we want to, then we'll slow down and start cutting destinations out towards the later of the trip. But this trip is meant to give us a general appreciation of what's there in Europe, what we'd like to see again and whatever was lacking int this trip, to make up for it the next time. <BR> <BR>Nothing like learning through your mistakes I suppose. <BR> <BR>I do thank everyone for their wonderful comments. We haven't yet had the time to sit down and start stream-lining. <BR> <BR>Andrew - I'd love to work in Europe. Maybe one day - need to job hunt first. <BR> <BR>Donna, we're first year out of uni, working people. So we do ahve a little bit more money to do jungfrau but not enough to sleep in 4 star hotels. :) <BR> <BR>Hope that has answered most queries. <BR> <BR>*sigh* Don't know if anyone has ever felt this way.. but sometimes you think that your itenerary is fine, and other times, you feel that it's too rushed. It's a very confusing yoyo effect. :)

April May 27th, 1999 07:53 PM

Hi Amanda, <BR>I think you should just do what you want to do. On the plus side, you'll find out where you want to return to for a longer visit. The downside is that you might find yourself, near the end of the trip, too tired to care about what you're seeing. Any kind of trip is a good trip as far as I'm concerned.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:47 AM.