![]() |
New format working fine so far.
Notice that when you go to the next 50 they are labeled 51 - 100 etc instead of always 1 - 50? Also when you go to the previous 50 it actually goes there. Before if you went to 51 - 100 and then 101 - 150, if you went to the previous 50 it would take you to where you came from not necessarily the prior 50. It also seems much faster today.<BR>Good job Fodors.<BR>Art
|
So far the search funtion is not working well at all. It will only match one word and either give you lots of irrelevant posts or nothing at all.<BR>Hopefully this will improve as they work on it.<BR><BR>Gerry
|
I did a search and got some hits, but when I clicked on them they did not just open up, instead I got one of those messages like "do you want to save this file or open it to a disk?" And that was for every message within a thread-- clearly not doable in any practical sense.<BR><BR>Liz
|
Yes, Art, I agree, some of the best features are back, and working like greased lightnin'! Not sure about more "complex" searches - - but simple ones are primo! Thanks again, Fodors!<BR><BR>It took me about two minutes to work my way back to my first post:<BR><BR>http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads.cfm?fid=2&searchtext=rex&start=284 1<BR><BR>on November 4, 1999 - - 2,840 posts ago.<BR><BR>not counting the anonymous ones...<BR><BR>Best wishes,<BR><BR>Rex<BR><BR>P.S. Of course, as soon as I post this it will be two-thousand, eight-hundred and forty ONE posts ago.<BR>
|
I've been off meeting some of you on the West Coast for the last couple of days. Do I assume from this that they're going to try to introduce the new stuff step by step?
|
I hope so Shiela. Having been in the IT industry for many years, I've seen my share of good implementations and total disasters. Making small changes at a time rather than wholesale is often the way to go.<BR>Cheers<BR>
|
The search function is working better now. In fact better than it ever has for me before. Thanks Fodors! And, here I thought they had abandoned us on this site. Apparently someone is still working over there.<BR><BR>Gerry
|
I have noticed that I get script errors when I post a reply. The reply posts anyway, but it is a bit of a bother.<BR>Regards<BR>Art<BR>
|
I got the script error transiently too, Art -- but now disappeared - - and two word searches seem to be working (unlike earlier today) - - for "Venice restaurants" - - for example.<BR><BR>
|
I had forgotten about this little blip on the radar screen this summer - - can't even remember how long it lasted. Wouldn't it be nice to have this number 51 etc back and working again? <BR>
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 AM. |